Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:58:20.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The persistence of drug resistant Escherichia coli in the intestinal flora of healthy broiler chicks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2010

M. Hinton ,
Z. A. M. Al-Chalaby ,
Vivien Allen  and
A. H. Linton
M. Hinton
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Avon BS18 7DU, U.K.
Z. A. M. Al-Chalaby
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Avon BS18 7DU, U.K.
Vivien Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bristol, Langford House, Langford, Avon BS18 7DU, U.K.
A. H. Linton
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, The Medical School, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TD, U.K.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Antibacterial drugs (oxytetracycline, streptomycin and sulphonamides) were included in the drinking water of healthy broiler chicks from the sixth to the twentieth day of life to select a resistant gut flora. On the twenty-first day the birds were divided into three groups and reared in separate rooms until 100 days of age. One group was housed in cages with wire floors while the others were reared on litter. Faeces from adult hens were added regularly to the litter of one of these groups to determine its effect on the gut flora of the chicks.

The ecology of Escherichia coli was studied using O-serotyping, biotyping and antibacterial drug resistogram typing. The proportion of E. coli in the dominant faecal flora resistant to two to four antibacterial drugs increased with time to reach a peak several days after the drugs were withdrawn. Thereafter, the level of drug resistance in the E. coli declined equally in all three groups. The majority of organisms with multiple resistance were derived from biotypes of O-serotypes initially resistant to only one drug and were identified before the drugs were administered. The decline in the level of resistance in the dominant faecal flora after the fourth week was due to the appearance of either new O-serotypes or new biotypes of O-serotypes previously shown to be multiply resistant, and which were either sensitive or resistant to only one drug. It is probable that these new strains were derived from the food since several O-serotypes appeared simultaneously in all three groups of birds.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 89 , Issue 2 , October 1982 , pp. 269 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

References

REFERENCES

Crichton, P. B. & Old, D. C. (1979). Biotyping of Escherichia coli. Journal of Medical Microbiology 12, 473–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartley, C. L., Howe, K., Linton, A. H., Linton, K. B. & Richmond, M. H. (1975). Distribution of R plasmids among the O-antigen types of Escherichia coli isolated from human and animal sources. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 8, 543–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinton, M., Allen, V. & Linton, A. H. (1982). The biotyping of Escherichia coli isolated from healthy farm animals. Journal of Hygiene 88, 121–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howe, K. & Linton, A. H. (1976). The distribution of O-antigen types of Escherichia coli in normal calves, compared with man, and their R plasmid carriage. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 40, 317–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linton, A. H., Howe, K., Bennett, P. M., Richmond, M. H. & Whiteside, E. J. (1977). The colonization of the human gut by antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli from chickens. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 43, 465–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linton, A. H., Howe, K. & Osborne, A. D. (1975). The effects of feeding tetracycline, nitrovin and quindoxin on the drug-resistance of coli-aerogenes bacteria from calves and pigs. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 38, 255–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linton, A. H., Howe, K., Richmond, M. H., Clements, H. M., Osborne, A. D. & Handley, B. (1978). Attempts to displace the indigenous antibiotic resistant gut flora of chickens by feeding sensitive strains of Escherichia coli prior to slaughter. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 45, 239–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, A. B., Cumming, R. B. & Kent, R. D. (1977). Prevention of Salmonella typhimurium infection in poultry by pretreatment of chicks and poults with intestinal extracts. Australian Veterinary Journal 53, 82–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rantala, M. & Nurmi, E. (1973). Prevention of the growth of Salmonella infantis in chicks by the flora of the alimentary tract of chickens. British Poultry Science 14, 627–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snoeyenbos, G. H., Weinack, O. M.& Smyser, C. F. (1977). Protecting chicks and poults from salmonellae by oral administration of ‘normal’ gut microflora. Avian Diseases 22, 273–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar