Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:15:12.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ELISAs and the serological analysis of salmonella infections in poultry: a review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

P. A. Barrow
P. A. Barrow*
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Health, Houghton Laboratory, Houghton, Huntingdon, Cambs PE17 2DA, England
*
*Institute for Animal Health, Compton, near Newbury, Berkshire RG16 ONN.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Large increases in the number of cases of human food-poisoning caused by salmonella have occurred in several countries in recent years. In England and Wales the annual number of bacteriologically confirmed cases rose from 10665 in 1981 to 30112 in 1990 and it is generally accepted that these figures are underestimates. The reasons for the unprecedented increase are largely unknown but may include increases in the consumption of convenience foods, poultry, and poultry products, together with a dramatic increase in Salmonella enteritidis infections in poultry. S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium are now the predominant serotypes both in human disease and in poultry.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 109 , Issue 3 , December 1992 , pp. 361 - 369
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

References

REFERENCES

1. Statutory Instruments. The Poultry Breeding Flocks and Hatcheries (Registration and Testing) Order No. 1963. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1989.Google Scholar
2. Statutory Instruments. The Poultry Laying Flocks (Testing and Registration etc.). Order No. 1964. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1989.Google Scholar
3.Williams, JE, Whittemore, AD. Comparison of six methods of detecting Salmonella typhimurium infection in chickens. Avian Dis 1976; 20: 728–34.Google Scholar
4.Snoeyenbos, GH. Pullorum disease. In: Calnek, BW, Barnes, HJ, Beard, CW, Reid, WM, Yoder, HW, eds. Diseases of poultry. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1991: 73–86.Google Scholar
5.Pomeroy, BS, Nagaraja, KV. Fowl typhoid. In: Calnek, BW, Barnes, HJ, Beard, CW, Reid, WM, Yoder, HW, eds. Diseases of poultry. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1991: 87–99.Google Scholar
6.Nagaraja, KV, Pomeroy, BS, Williams, JE. Paratyphoid infections. In: Calnek, BW, Barnes, HJ, Beard, CW, Reid, WM, Yoder, HW, eds. Diseases of poultry. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1991: 99–130.Google Scholar
7.Mockett, APA, Darbyshire, JH. Comparative studies with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. (ELISA) for antibodies to avian infectious bronchitis virus. Avian Pathol 1981; 10: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Baxter-Jones, C, Grant, M, Jones, RC, Wilding, GPA. A comparison of three methods for detecting antibodies to turkey rhinotracheitis virus. Avian Pathol 1989; 18: 91–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Briggs, DJ, Skeeles, JK. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detecting antibodies to Pasteurella multocida in chickens. Avian Dis 1983; 28: 208–15.Google Scholar
10.Hatfield, RM, Morris, BA, Henry, RR. Development of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of humoral antibody to Pasteurella anatipestifer. Avian Pathol 1987; 16: 123–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Carlsson, HE, Lindberg, AA, Hammarstrom, S. Titration of antibodies to salmonella O antigens by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Infect Immun 1972; 6: 703–8.Google Scholar
12.Lentsch, RH, Batema, RP, Wagner, JE. Detection of salmonella infections by polyvalent enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Microbiol 1981; 14: 281–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Engleberg, NC, Barrett, TJ, Fisher, H, Porter, B, Hurtado, E, Hyghes, JM. Identification of a carrier by using Vi enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay serology in an outbreak of typhoid fever on an Indian reservation. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 18: 1320–2.Google Scholar
14.Nagaraja, KV, Emery, DA, Sherlock, LF, Newman, JS, Pomeroy, BS. Detection of Salmonella arizonae in turkey flocks by ELISA. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, 1984: 185–204.Google Scholar
15.Nagaraja, KV, Ausherman, LT, Emery, DA, Pomeroy, BS. Update on enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for its field application in the detection of Salmonella arizonae infection in breeder flocks of turkeys. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, 1986: 347–56.Google Scholar
16. Report. Unpublished report of the World Health Organization Working Party on salmonella immunization in animals. Jena, Germany, 17–2105 1991. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1991.Google Scholar
17.Hassan, JO, Barrow, PA, Mockett, APA, McLeod, S. Antibody response to experimental Salmonella typhimurium infection in chickens measured by ELISA. Vet Rec 1990; 126: 519–22.Google ScholarPubMed
18.Chart, H, Rowe, B, Baskerville, A, Humphrey, TJ. Serological response of chickens to Salmonella enteritidis infection. Epidemiol Infect 1990; 104: 63–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Humphrey, TJ, Baskerville, A, Chart, H, Rowe, B. Infection of egg-laying hens with Salmonella enteritidis PT4 by oral inoculation. Vet Rec 1989; 125: 531–2.Google Scholar
20.Nicholas, RAJ, Cullen, GA. Development and application of an ELISA for detecting antibodies to Salmonella enteritidis in chicken flocks. Vet Rec 1991; 128: 74–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Humphrey, TJ, Baskerville, A, Chart, H, Rowe, B, Whitehead, A. Salmonella enteritidis PT4 infection in specific pathogen free hens: influence of infecting dose. Vet Rec 1991; 129: 482–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Humphrey, TJ, Chart, H, Baskerville, A, Rowe, B. The influence of age on the response of SPF hens to infection with Salmonella enteritidis PT4. Epidemiol Infect 1991; 106: 33–43.Google Scholar
23.Kim, CJ, Nagaraja, KV, Pomeroy, BS. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of Salmonella enteritidis infection in chickens. Amer J Vet Res 1991; 52: 1069–74.Google Scholar
24.Dadrast, H. Hesketh, R, Taylor, DJ. Egg yolk antibody detection in identification of salmonella infected poultry. Vet Rec 1990; 126: 219.Google ScholarPubMed
25.Hassan, JO, Mockett, APA, Catty, D, Barrow, PA. Infection and reinfection of chicken with Salmonella typhimurium: bacteriology and immune responses. Infect Immun 1991; 35: 809–19.Google ScholarPubMed
26.Barrow, PA, Lovell, MA. Experimental infection of egg-laying hens with Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4. Avian Pathol 1991; 20: 335–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Barrow, PA, Berchieri, A, Al-Haddad, O. The serological response of chickens to infection with Salmonella gallinarum-pullorum detected by ELISA. Avian Dis 1992; 36: 227–36.Google Scholar
28.Barrow, PA. Further observations on the serological response to experimental Salmonella typhimurium infection in chickens measured by ELISA. Epidemiol Infect 1992; 108: 231–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Rose, ME, Orlans, E. Immunoglobulins in the egg, embryo and young chick. Development Compar Immunol 1981; 5: 15–20.Google Scholar
30.Kaspers, B, Schranner, I, Lösch, U. Distribution of Immunoglobulins during embryogenesis in the chicken. J Vet Med 1991; A38: 73–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Piela, TH, Gulka, GM, Yates, VJ, Chang, PW. Use of egg yolk in serological tests (ELISA and HI) to detect antibody to Newcastle disease, infectious bronchitis and Mycoplasma gallispeticum. Avian Dis 1984; 28: 877–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Mohammed, HO, Yamamoto, R, Carpenter, TE, Ortmayer, HB. A statistical model to optimize enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay parameters for detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum and M. synoviae antibodies in egg yolk. Avian Dis 1986; 30: 389–97.Google Scholar
33.Nicholas, RAJ, Cullen, GA, Duff, P. Detection of salmonella. Vet Rec 1990; 126: 147.Google Scholar
34.Nicholas, RAJ, Andrews, SJ. Detection of antibody to Salmonella enteritidis and S. typhimurium in the yolk of hens' eggs. Vet Rec 1991; 128: 98–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Cooper, GL, Nicholas, RA, Bracewell, CD. Serological and bacteriological investigations of chickens from flocks naturally infected with Salmonella enteritidis. Vet Rec 1989; 125: 567–72.Google Scholar
36.Timoney, JF, Sikora, N, Shivaprasad, HL, Opitz, M. Detection of antibody to Salmonella enteritidis by a gm flagellin-based ELISA. Vet Rec 1990; 127: 168–9.Google Scholar
37.Bumstead, N, Barrow, PA. Genetics of resistance to Salmonella typhimurium in newly hatched chicks. Brit Poult Sci 1988; 29: 521–9.Google Scholar
38.Minga, U, Wray, C. Serological tests for Salmonella enteritidis in chickens. Vet Rec 1990; 126: 20–1.Google Scholar
39.Chart, H, Rowe, B, Baskerville, A, Humphrey, TJ. Serological analysis of chicken flocks for antibodies to Salmonella enteritidis. Vet Rec 1990; 127: 501–2.Google Scholar
40.McLeod, S, Barrow, PA. Lipopolysaccharide-specific IgG in egg yolk from two chicken flocks infected with Salmonella enteritidis. Lett Appl Microbiol 1991; 13: 294–7.Google Scholar
41.Barrow, PA, Hassan, JO, Mockett, APA, McLeod, S. Detection of salmonella infection by ELISA. Vet Rec 1989; 125: 586.Google ScholarPubMed
42.Chart, H, Rowe, B, Baskerville, A, Humphrey, TJ. Serological tests for Salmonella enteritidis in chickens. Vet Rec 1990; 126: 20.Google ScholarPubMed
43.Chart, H, Rowe, B, Baskerville, A, Humphrey, TJ. Serological tests for Salmonella enteritidis in chicken. Vet Rec 1990; 126: 92.Google Scholar
44.Barrow, PA. Serological analysis for antibodies to S. enteritidis. Vet Rec 1991; 128: 43–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45.Chart, H. Rowe, B, Baskerville, A, Humphrey, TJ. Serological analysis for antibodies to S. enteritidis. Vet Rec 1991; 218: 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46.Cullen, GA, Nicholas, RAJ. Serological analysis for antibodies to S. enteritidis. Vet Rec 1991; 128: 387–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed