Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:36:19.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Lindbert and McCool: 'A critique of environmental carrying capacity as a means of managing the effects of tourism development'

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1998

KATRINA BROWN ,
KERRY TURNER ,
HALA HAMEED  and
IAN BATEMAN
KATRINA BROWN
Affiliation:
School of Development Studies, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK. Email: [email protected] Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia and University College London, UK
KERRY TURNER
Affiliation:
Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia and University College London, UK
HALA HAMEED
Affiliation:
Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia and University College London, UK
IAN BATEMAN
Affiliation:
Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia and University College London, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Comment by Lindberg and McCool (1998) makes a useful contribution to the debate on carrying capacity and reaffirms the observations and conclusions of our original paper, which include the fact that carrying capacity may be conceptually controversial, is problematic in its application and is of limited use in devising policy guidelines (Brown et al. 1997).

Type
Comment
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , December 1998 , pp. 293 - 294
Copyright
© 1998 Foundation for Environmental Conservation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)