Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:47:05.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating governance processes in the sharing of revenues from wildlife tourism and hunting in Ethiopia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2013

YITBAREK T. W. ,
DEGU TADIE ,
GIRMA TIMER  and
ANKE FISCHER
YITBAREK T. W.
Affiliation:
Frankfurt Zoological Society, PO Box 100003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
DEGU TADIE
Affiliation:
Frankfurt Zoological Society, PO Box 100003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
GIRMA TIMER
Affiliation:
Bureau of Culture and Tourism, Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples Regional State, PO Box 1078, Awassa, Ethiopia
ANKE FISCHER*
Affiliation:
Frankfurt Zoological Society, PO Box 100003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Social, Economic and Geographical Sciences Group, The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK
*
*Correspondence: Dr Anke Fischer Tel: +44 1224 395 299 e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Sharing of benefits from nature conservation is widely regarded as a way to enhance local residents’ support for protected areas. While in past years, the effectiveness of such approaches has been investigated in detail, governance processes underpinning benefit sharing have received less attention. This study examines the legislation and implementation practice of a revenue sharing scheme in southern Ethiopia, an area that is currently undergoing substantial social and environmental changes that threaten livelihoods and ecosystems. Based on qualitative data from interviews, group discussions and workshops, four main areas of shortcomings in the current legislation and implementation practice were identified: information provision; imbalanced roles and responsibilities; compromised accountability; and the lack of connection between revenue and wildlife tourism in the minds of the recipients. While some of these factors fostered misunderstandings and misuse of the monies, others meant that even where revenue was disbursed it was not connected with wildlife conservation, and thus did not have the intended effect. A comparison between these factors and those in the literature on the evaluation of comanagement arrangements revealed substantial overlap. Revenue sharing may be regarded as part of the comanagement of wildlife areas, but to be successful the management of these areas needs to be shared, and not just the financial benefits.

Keywords

adaptivebenefit sharingcomanagementEthiopiagovernanceprotected areaswildlife
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 253 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, W.M. & Hulme, D. (2001) Conservation and communities: changing narratives, policies and practices in African conservation. In: African Wildlife and Livelihoods: the Promise and Performance of Community Conservation, ed. Hulme, D. & Murphree, M., pp. 9–23. London, UK: James Currey.Google Scholar
Adams, W.M. & Infield, M. (2003) Who is on the gorilla's payroll? Claims on tourist revenue from a Ugandan national park. World Development 31: 177–190.Google Scholar
Admasu, T., Abule, E. & Tessema, Z. (2010) Livestock-rangeland management practices and community perceptions towards rangeland degradation in South Omo zone of Southern Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 22: 5.Google Scholar
Agrawal, A. & Ribot, J.C. (1999) Accountability in decentralization: a framework with South Asian and West African cases. The Journal of Developing Areas 33: 473–502.Google Scholar
Archabald, K. & Naughton-Treves, L. (2001) Tourism revenue sharing around national parks in western Uganda: early efforts to identify and reward local communities. Environmental Conservation 23: 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashenafi, Z.T. & Leader-Williams, N. (2005) Indigenous common property resource management in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Human Ecology 33: 539–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjaminsen, T.A. & Svarstad, H. (2010) The death of an elephant: conservation discourses versus practices in Africa. Forum for Development Studies 37: 385–408.Google Scholar
Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Farvar, M.T., Nguinguiri, J.C. & Ndangang, V.A. (2000) Co-management of Natural Resources: Organising, Negotiating and Learning-by-doing. GTZ and IUCN. Heidelberg, Germany: Kasparek Verlag.Google Scholar
Carlsson, L. & Berkes, F. (2005) Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management 75: 65–76.Google Scholar
CSA (2007) Population Size, Region by Sex and Place of Residence. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Central Statistical Authority.Google Scholar
Dickman, A.J., Macdonald, E.A. & Macdonald, D.W. (2011) A review of financial instruments to pay for predator conservation and encourage human–carnivore coexistence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108: 13937–13944.Google Scholar
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E. & Stern, P. (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302: 1907–1912.Google Scholar
Fiallo, E.A. & Jacobson, S.K. (1995) Local communities and protected areas: attitudes of rural residents towards conservation and Machalilla National Park, Ecuador. Environmental Conservation 22: 241–249.Google Scholar
Fisher, R.J., Maginnis, S., Jackson, W.J., Barrow, E. & Jeanrenaud, S. (2005) Poverty and Conservation: Landscapes, People and Power. Landscapes and Livelihoods Series No.2. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN [www document]. URL http://data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/FR-LL-002.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C.S. & Walker, B. (2002) Resilience for sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 31: 437–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, P.G.H. & Bond, , , I. (2008) The CAMPFIRE programme in Zimbabwe: payments for wildlife services. Ecological Economics 65: 776–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebre Michael, Y., Hadgu, K. & Ambaye, Z. (2005) Addressing pastoralist conflict in Ethiopia: the case of Kuraz and Hamer sub-districts of South Omo zone. Report of the 2005 Africa Peace Forum, Nairobi, Kenya [www document]. URL http://www.saferworld.org.uk/downloads/pubdocs/Addressing%20pastoralist%20conflict%20in%20Ethiopia.pdfGoogle Scholar
Getz, W.M., Fortmann, L., Cumming, D., du Toit, J., Hilty, J., Martin, R., Murphree, M., Owen-Smith, N., Starfield, A.M. & Westphal, M.I. (1999) Sustaining natural and human capital: villagers and scientists. Science 283: 1855–1856.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. & Marks, S. (1995) Transforming rural hunters into conservationists: an assessment of community-based wildlife management programs in Africa. World Development 23: 941–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillingham, S. & Lee, P.C. (1999) The impact of wildlife-related benefits on the conservation attitudes of local people around the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania. Environmental Conservation 26: 218–228.Google Scholar
Groom, R. & Harris, S. (2008) Conservation on community lands: the importance of equitable revenue sharing. Environmental Conservation 35: 242–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellin, J. & Schrader, K. (2003) The case against direct incentives and the search for alternative approaches to better land management in Central America. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 99: 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulme, D. & Murphree, M., eds (2001) African Wildlife and African Livelihoods: the Promise and Performance of Community Conservation. Oxford, UK: James Currey.Google Scholar
Infield, M. (1988) Attitudes of a rural community towards conservation and a local conservation area in Natal, South Africa. Biological Conservation 45: 21–46.Google Scholar
IUCN-WCPA (2008) Establishing Marine Protected Area Networks: Making It Happen. Washington, DC, USA: IUCN-WCPA, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and The Nature Conservancy. [www document]. URL https://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/mpanetworksmakingithappen_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Lowassa, A., Tadie, D. & Fischer, A. (2012) On the role of women in bushmeat hunting: insights from Tanzania and Ethiopia. Journal of Rural Studies 28: 622–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. & Alpert, P. (1997) Trophy hunting and wildlife conservation in Zambia. Conservation Biology 11: 59–68.Google Scholar
Mabugu, R. & Mugoya, P. (2001) Financing, revenue-sharing and taxation issues in wildlife management areas. Report prepared for Wildlife Division, Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism and USAID, Tanzania [www document]. URL http://www.irgltd.com/Resources/Publications/Africa/2001-10%20Financing,%20Revenue,%20Taxation%20in%20Wildlife%20Management-Tanzania.pdfGoogle Scholar
Manyindo, J. & Makumbi, I. (2005) A review of revenue sharing around the Queen Elizabeth Protected Area. Report of the Ugandan Wildlife Service, Wildlife Series no. 4, Uganda [www document]. URL http://www.uws.or.ug/wp-content/uploads/QEPA%20RS%20brief.pdfGoogle Scholar
Morgera, E. & Tsioumani, E. (2010) The evolution of benefit-sharing: linking biodiversity and community livelihoods. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 15: 150–173.Google Scholar
Nkhata, B.A., Mosimane, A., Downsborough, L., Breen, C. & Roux, D.J. (2012) A typology of benefit sharing arrangements for the governance of social-ecological systems in developing countries. Ecology and Society 17: 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, P., Folke, C. & Hahn, T. (2004) Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecology and Society 9: 2.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, K. (2005) Ethnographic Methods. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2000) Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14: 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plummer, R. & Armitage, D. (2007) A resilience-based framework for evaluating adaptive co-management: linking ecology, economics and society in a complex world. Ecological Economics 61: 62–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prager, K., Reed, M. & Scott, A. (2012) Encouraging collaboration for the provision of ecosystem services at a landscape scale. Rethinking agri-environmental payments. Land Use Policy 29: 244–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekhar, N.U. (2003) Local people's attitudes towards conservation and wildlife tourism around Sarsika Tiger Reserve, India. Journal of Environmental Management 69: 339–347.Google Scholar
Skonhoft, A. (1998) Resource utilization, property rights and welfare: wildlife and the local people. Ecological Economics 26: 67–80.Google Scholar
Skonhoft, A. & Solstad, J. (1998) The political economy of wildlife exploitation. Land Economics 74: 16–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smoke, P. (2003) Decentralisation in Africa: goals, dimensions, myths and challenges. Public Administration and Development 23: 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tadie, D. & Fischer, A. (2013) Hunting, social structure and human-nature relationships in lower Omo, Ethiopia: people and wildlife at a crossroads. Human Ecology (in press) doi: 10.1007/s10745-012-9561-9 [www document]. URL http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10745-012-9561-9/fulltext.htmlGoogle Scholar
Van Hal, M. (2006) Evaluation of co-management in national parks: the case of Retezat National Park, Romania. MSc dissertation, Wageningen University and Research Centre (WUR) and World Leisure International Centre of Excellence (WICE), Wageningen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Winkler, R. (2011) Why do ICDPs fail? The relationship between agriculture, hunting and ecotourism in wildlife conservation. Resource and Energy Economics 33: 55–78.Google Scholar
World Bank (2009) Local government discretion and accountability: application of a local governance framework. Social Development Department, Report No: 49059-GLB, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA [www document]. URL https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/7859/401530Local1Go1ountability01PUBLIC1.pdf?sequence=1Google Scholar