Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:19:14.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Energy-flow Relationships Between Agro- and Forest Ecosystems in Central Himalaya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Uma Pandey  and
J.S. Singh
Uma Pandey
Affiliation:
Senior Research Associate, ISRO Remote Sensing Project, Department of Botany, Kumaun University, Naini Tal 263002, India
J.S. Singh
Affiliation:
Principal Investigator of the DST Ecology Project & Reader in Botany, Department of Botany, Kumaun University, Naini Tal 263002, India.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The primary occupation of 90% of the rural population of the hilly regions of the Central Himalaya is agriculture. The cultivated land is the nucleus of village settlements and also a factor which leads to increases in the human and livestock populations in a positive feedback manner, taking over land from forests at an ever-increasing rate. These village anthropobiomes are centres of massive energy-consumption.

A detailed study was conducted on three villages, Khurpatal, Bhalutia, and Mehragaon, with a view to investigate (a) the energy efficiency of agriculture, (b) the viability of their agro-ecosystems, and (c) the viability of forest ecosystems at the current level of agricultural activity. The cropping systems are divisible into vegetable and wheat-based systems. Among different crop-combinations, wheat-soybean is characterized by the minimum energy input and potato-cabbage-potato by the maximum energy input in Khurpatal. Thus from an energetic point of view, wheat-soybean is the most efficient (output: input ratio = 12.03) cropping pattern. Among alternatives practised in the remaining two villages, the wheat—paddy combination of Bhalutia is the most efficient, having an output: input ratio of 1.35, and the wheat-maize and fallow-pulses systems of Mehragaon are the most inefficient, with an output: input ratio of, respectively, 0.55 and 0.18.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , Spring 1984 , pp. 45 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Airy, K.S. & Shastri, C. (1982). Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of human population. Pages 144–63 in J.S. Singh (Principal Investigator) An Integrated Ecological Study of Eastern Kumaun Himalaya, with Emphasis on Natural Resources. Second Annual Report (HCS/DST/187/76), Kumaun University, Naini Tal, Uttar Pradesh, India: iv + 193 pp.Google Scholar
Anon. (1982 a). Sankhikiya Patrica. Office of the Statistics Officer, Economic and Statistics Department, State Planning Institute, Naini Tal, Uttar Pradesh, India: 102 pp.Google Scholar
Anon. (1982 b). Sankhikiya Patrica. Office of the Statistics Officer, Economic and Statistics Department, State Planning Institute, Almora, Uttar Pradesh, India: 131 pp.Google Scholar
Anon. (1982 c). Sankhikiya Patrica. Office of the Statistics Officer, Economic and Statistics Department, State Planning Institute, Pithoragarh, Uttar Pradesh, India: 145 pp.Google Scholar
Ashish, M. (1983). Agricultural economy of Kumaun Hills: threat of ecological disaster. Pp. 184–204 in The Himalaya: Nature, Man and Culture (Ed. Singh, O.P.). Rajesh Publications, New Delhi, India: xx + 379 pp.Google Scholar
Bahuguna, S.L. (1981). Science and rural development in hill regions. Pp. 9–15 in Science and Rural Development in Mountains (Ed. Singh, J.S., Singh, S.P. & Shastri, C.). Gyanodaya Prakashan, Naini Tal, Uttar Pradesh, India: xv + 468 pp.Google Scholar
Das, S.K. (1981). Plan for Afforestation in Civil-soyam Panchayat and Pasture Land and Solving the Problem of Fuel, Wood-material for Agricultural Appliances, and Fodder for Livestock, by Managing the Grazing Lands of Almora Districts. District Magistrate, Almora, Uttar Pradesh, India: 9 pp.Google Scholar
Gopalan, C., Ramasastri, B.V. & Balasubramaniam, S.C. (1978). Nutritive Value of Indian Foods. National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, India: 204 pp.Google Scholar
Gupta, P.N. (1981). Problems and their solution in the Himalayan and Shiwalik regions of Uttar Pradesh: an overview. Pp. 260–6 in Science and Rural Development in Mountains (Ed. Singh, J.S., Singh, S.P. & Shastri, C.). Gyanodaya Prakashan, Naini Tal, Uttar Pradesh, India: xv + 468 pp.Google Scholar
Mehra, M.S. (1982). Litter fall and nutrient return. Pp. 23–34 in J.S. Singh (Principal Investigator) An Integrated Ecological Study of Eastern Kumaun Himalaya, with Emphasis on Natural Resources. Second Annual Report (HCS/DST/187/76), Kumaun University, Naini Tal, Uttar Pradesh, India: 193 pp.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. (1979). The Analysis of Indian Agro-ecosystems. Interprint, New Delhi, India: 180 pp.Google Scholar
Pandey, U., Saxena, A.K., Pandey, H.K. & Singh, J.S. (1982). Problems of forests and forestry in Kumaun Himalaya. Pp. 68–99 in The Vegetational Wealth of Himalayas (Ed. Paliwal, G.S.). Puja Publishers, New Delhi, India: ix + 566 pp.Google Scholar
Pandey, U. & Singh, J.S. (in press). Energetics of hill agroecosystems: a case-study from Central Himalaya. Agricultural Systems.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D., Hurd, L.E., Bellotti, A.C., Forster, M.L., Oka, I.D., Sholes, O.D. & Whitman, R.J. (1973). Food production and energy crisis. Science, 182, pp. 443–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ralhan, P.K., Saxena, A.K. & Singh, J.S. (1982). Analysis of forest vegetation at and around Naini Tal in Kumaun Himalaya. Proc. Indian Natl Sci. Acad. B, 48 (1), pp. 121–37.Google Scholar
Rawat, A.S. & Shastri, C. (1983). Demographic profile of Kumaun Garhwal Hills in Retrospect: 1865–1931. Pp. 149–57 in The Himalaya: Nature, Man and Culture (Ed. Singh, O.P.). Rajesh Publications, New Delhi, India: 379 pp.Google Scholar
Rieger, H.C. (1981). Man versus mountain: The destruction of the Himalayan ecosystem. Pp. 351–76 in The Himalaya: Aspects of Change (Ed. Lall, J.S. & Moddie, A.D.). Oxford University Press, New Delhi, India: xx + 481 pp.Google Scholar
Saxena, A.K. & Singh, J.S. (1980). Analysis of forest grazingland vegetation in parts of Kumaun Himalaya. Indian J. Range Management, 1(1), pp. 13–32.Google Scholar
Saxena, A.K. & Singh, J.S. (1982). A phytosociological analysis of woody species in forest communities of a part of Kumaun Himalayas. Vegetatio, 50, pp. 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, S.L. (1981). The dynamics of changing agriculture in a micro-watershed in the Kumaun Hills of Uttar Pradesh. Pp. 434–46 in The Himalaya: Aspects of Change (Ed. Lall, J.S. & Moddie, A.D.). Oxford University Press, New Delhi, India: xx + 481 pp.Google Scholar
Shah, S.L. (1982). Ecological degradation and future of agriculture in the Himalayas. Indian J. Agr. Econ., 37(1), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Singh, J.S., Pandey, A.N. & Pathak, P.C. (1983). A hypothesis to account for the major pathway of soil loss from Himalaya. Environmental Conservation, 10(4), pp. 343–5, 3 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiwari, A.K., Tewari, J.C. & Singh, J.S. (in press). Application of aerial photoanalysis for assessment of vegetation in Kumaun Himalaya, II: Kathgodam to Okhalkanda. Proc. Indian Natl Sci. Acad. B, 94.Google Scholar
Worthington, E.B. (1982). World campaign for The Biosphere. Environmental Conservation, 9(2), pp. 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar