Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:53:25.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fishing for a solution: can collaborative resource management reduce poverty and support conservation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

JENNIFER SOLOMON ,
SUSAN K. JACOBSON  and
IVY LIU
JENNIFER SOLOMON*
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, PO Box 110430, Gainesville, FL 32611–0430, USA
SUSAN K. JACOBSON
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, PO Box 110430, Gainesville, FL 32611–0430, USA
IVY LIU
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Statistics, and Operations Research, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
*
*Correspondence: Dr Jennifer Solomon current address: 49 Wye Street, Island Bay, Wellington 6023, New Zealand Tel: +64 4 383 6333 e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Protected area management in developing countries faces the challenges of building support for conservation among neighbouring residents and monitoring the social and ecological impacts of conservation programming. This study examined a collaborative resource management (CRM) programme at Kibale National Park (Uganda) that permits residents to fish inside the Park. Like other integrated conservation and development programmes, the goals are to help alleviate poverty and encourage support for conservation and conservation-related behaviours. The programme's impact was empirically analysed using an 81 item personal survey, with 94 CRM fishers and 91 comparison group respondents, and additional data from semi-structured interviews and document review. Fishers’ annual income was significantly greater (median = US$ 376.02 yr−1) than that of the comparison group (median = US$ 196.19 yr−1; p < 0.001), and their tribal affiliation influenced earnings. Fishers indicated greater support for conservation (p < 0.01) than the comparison group. Although some CRM fishers deterred illegal activity, some may extract resources illegally. This study demonstrates that CRM is a viable tool for promoting support for conservation and increasing income, although monitoring of programme participants is needed to deter illegal behaviours and sustain the resource base.

Keywords

attitudesdevelopmentKibaleprotected areassurveyUganda
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 51 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, W. & Hulme, D. (2001) Conservation and community: changing narratives, policies and practices in African conservation. In: African Wildlife and Livelihoods: The Promise and Performance of Community Conservation, ed. Hulme, D. & Murphree, M., pp. 10–23. Oxford, UK: James Currey.Google Scholar
Adams, A.M., Evans, T.G., Mohammed, R. & Farnsworth, J. (1997) Socioeconomic stratification by wealth ranking. World Development 25: 1165–1172.Google Scholar
Agresti, A. (2002) Categorical Data Analysis. Second edition. NJ, USA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Alpert, P. (1996) Integrated conservation and development projects: examples from Africa. BioScience 46: 845–856.Google Scholar
Arjunan, M., Holmes, C., Puyravaud, J.P. & Davidar, P. (2006) Do developmental initiatives influence local attitudes toward conservation? A case study from the Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, India. Journal of Environmental Management 79: 188–197.Google Scholar
Bauer, H. (2003) Local perceptions of Waza National Park, northern Cameroon. Environmental Conservation 30: 175–181.Google Scholar
Behling, O. & Law, K.S. (2000) Translating Questionnaires and Other Research Instruments: Problems and Solutions. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Bernard, H.R. (2002) Research Methods in Anthropology. Walnut Creek, CA, USA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Borrini-Feyerabend, G. (1996) Collaborative Management of Protected Areas: Tailoring the Approach to the Context. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN (World Conservation Union).Google Scholar
Brechin, S., Wilshusen, P., Fortwangler, C. & West, P. (2002) Beyond the square wheel: toward a more comprehensive understanding of biodiversity conservation as a social and political process. Society and Natural Resources 15: 41–64.Google Scholar
Browne-Nuñez, C. & Jonker, S.A. (2008) Attitudes toward wildlife and conservation across Africa: a review of survey research. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 13: 49–72.Google Scholar
Chapman, C.A. & Lambert, J.E. (2000) Habitat alteration and the conservation of african primates: case study of Kibale National Park, Uganda. American Journal of Primatology 50: 169–185.Google Scholar
Chege, F., Onyango, G., Drazu, C. & Mwandha, S. (2002) Kibale and Semuliki Conservation and Development Project End of Phase III / End of Project Evaluation Report, Vol. 2006. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Chhetri, P., Mugisha, A. & White, S. (2003) Community resource use in Kibale and Mt Elgon National Parks, Uganda. Parks 13: 28–38.Google Scholar
Conley, A. & Moote, M.A. (2003) Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 16: 371–386.Google Scholar
Coomes, O.T., Barham, B.L. & Takasaki, Y. (2004) Targeting conservation-development initiatives in tropical forests: insights from analyses of rain forest use and economic reliance among Amazonian peasants. Ecological Economics 51: 47–64.Google Scholar
Cordeiro, N.J., Burgess, N.D., Dovie, D.B.K., Kaplin, B.A., Plumptre, A.J. & Marrs, R. (2007) Conservation in areas of high population density in sub-Saharan Africa. Biological Conservation 134: 155–163.Google Scholar
Emerton, L. (2001) The nature of benefits and the benefits of nature, In: African Wildlife and Livelihoods: The Promise and Performance of Community Conservation, ed. Hulme, D. & Murphree, M., pp. 208–226. Oxford, UK: James Currey.Google Scholar
Ferraro, P.J. (2001) Global habitat protection: limitations of development interventions and a role for conservation performance payments. Conservation Biology 15: 990–1000.Google Scholar
Ferraro, P.J. & Pattanayak, S.K. (2006) Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments. PLoS Biology 4 (4): 0482–0488.Google Scholar
Fiallo, E. & Jacobson, S.K. (1995) Local communities and protected areas: attitudes of rural residents toward conservation and Machalilla National Park, Ecuador. Environmental Conservation 22 (3): 241–249.Google Scholar
Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975) Beliefs, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Gartlan, S. (2004) Land tenure and state property: a comparison of the Korup and Kilum ICDPs in Cameroon. In: Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work, ed. McShane, T.O. & Wells, M.P., pp. 208–231. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gillingham, S. & Lee, P.C. (1999) The impact of wildlife-related benefits on the conservation attitudes of local people around the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania. Environmental Conservation 26: 218–228.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A., Cunningham, A., Byarugaba, D. & Kayanja, F. (2000) Conservation in a region of political instability: Bwindi Impenetrable Forest, Uganda. Conservation Biology 14: 1722–1725.Google Scholar
Hartter, J. (2009) Attitudes of rural communities toward wetlands and forest fragments around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 14: 433–447.Google Scholar
Hill, C.M. (1998) Conflicting attitudes towards elephants around the Budongo Forest Reserve, Uganda. Environmental Conservation 25: 244–250.Google Scholar
Hulme, D. (1998) Community conservation in practice: a case study of Lake Mburo National Park, Report No. Paper No. 3. In: Working Papers: Community Conservation Research in Africa. Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
Infield, M. & Namara, A. (2001) Community attitudes and behaviour towards conservation: an assessment of a community conservation programme around Lake Mburo National Park. Oryx 35: 48–60.Google Scholar
International Institute for Sustainable Development (2003) A guide for field projects on adaptive strategies [www document]. URL http://www.iisd.org/casl/CASLGuide/WealthRanking.htmGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, S.K. (2009) Communication Skills for Conservation Professionals. Second edition. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, S.K., McDuff, M. & Monroe, M. (2006) Conservation Education and Outreach Techniques. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kellert, S. R., Mehta, J.N., Ebbin, S.A. & Lichtenfeld, L.L. (2000) Community natural resource management: promise, rhetoric, and reality. Society and Natural Resources 13: 705–715.Google Scholar
Kiss, A. (2004) Making biodiversity conservation a land-use priority. In: Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work, ed. McShane, T.O. & Wells, M.P., pp. 98–123. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lepp, A. & Holland, S. (2006) Comparison of attitudes toward state-led conservation and community-based conservation in the village of Bigodi, Uganda. Society and Natural Resources 19: 609–623.Google Scholar
Lewis, D., Kaweche, G.B. & Mwenya, A. (1990) Wildlife conservation: an experiment in Zambia. Conservation Biology 4: 171–180.Google Scholar
Lewis, D.M. & Phiri, A. (1998) Wildlife snaring: an indicator of community response to a community-based conservation project. Oryx 32: 111–121.Google Scholar
Marcus, R.R. (2006) Seeing the forest for the trees: integrated conservation and development projects and local conservation in Madagascar. Human Ecology: An Interdisciplinary Journal 29: 381–398.Google Scholar
Margoluis, R., Stem, C., Salafsky, N. & Brown, M. (2009) Design alternatives for evaluating the impact of conservation projects. In: Environmental Program and Policy Evaluation: Addressing Methodological Challenges, New Directions for Evaluation, Volume 122, ed. Birnbaum, M. & Mickwitz, P.L., pp. 85–96. Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company, and the American Evaluation Association.Google Scholar
McShane, T.O. & Newby, S.A. (2004) Expecting the unattainable: the assumptions behind ICDPs. In: Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work, ed. McShane, T.O. & Wells, M.P., pp. 49–74. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mehta, J.N. & Heinen, J.T. (2001) Does community-based conservation shape favorable attitudes among locals? An empirical study from Nepal. Environmental Management 28: 165–177.Google Scholar
Melnychuk, M.C. & Chapman, L.J. (2002) Hypoxia tolerance of two haplochromine cichlids: swamp leakage and potential for interlacustrine dispersal. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 65: 99–110.Google Scholar
Milner-Gulland, E.J. & Leader-Williams, N. (1992) A model of incentives for the illegal exploitation of black rhinos and elephants: poaching pays in Luangwa Valley, Zambia. Journal of Applied Ecology 29: 388–401.Google Scholar
Monroe, M.C. (2003) Two avenues for encouraging conservation behaviors. Research in Human Ecology 10: 113–125.Google Scholar
Morgan-Brown, T., Jacobson, S.K., Wald, K. & Childs, B. (2010) Quantitative assessment of a Tanzanian integrated conservation and development project involving butterfly farming. Conservation Biology 24: 563–572.Google Scholar
Mugisha, A. (2002) Evaluation of community-based conservation approaches: management of protected areas in Uganda. PhD thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
Mugisha, A.R. & Jacobson, S.K. (2004) Threat reduction assessment of conventional and community-based conservation approaches to managing protected areas in Uganda. Environmental Conservation 31: 233–241.Google Scholar
Naughton-Treves, L. (1996) Uneasy neighbors: wildlife and farmers around Kibale National Park, Uganda. PhD thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
Naughton-Treves, L., Kammen, D.M. & Chapman, C. (2007) Burning biodiversity: woody biomass use by commercial and subsistence groups in western Uganda's forests. Biological Conservation 134: 232–241.Google Scholar
Newmark, W.D., Leonard, N.L., Sariko, H.I. & Gamassa, D.G.M. (1993) Conservation attitudes of local people living adjacent to five protected areas in Tanzania. Biological Conservation 63: 177–183.Google Scholar
Ogwal, J.J. (2003) Fish Resource Harvesting in Lake Kabaleke (Kayanja Landing Site) 2000–2002. Kampala, Uganda: Uganda Wildlife Authority, Kibale Conservation Area.Google Scholar
Ramsar Convention Secretariat (2008) The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands [www document]. URL http://www.ramsar.orgGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J.G. & Redford, K.H. (2004) Jack of all trades, master of none: inherent contradictions among ICD approaches. In: Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work, ed. McShane, T.O. & Wells, M.P., pp. 10–34. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, P. (1998) From Conflict to Collaboration: People and Forests at Mount Elgon, Uganda. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN.Google Scholar
Selin, S. & Chavez, D. (1995) Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management. Environmental Management 19 (2): 189–195.Google Scholar
Shields, D. & Slocum, R. (1995) Wealth ranking. In: Power, Process and Participation - Tools for Change, ed. Slocum, R., Wichhart, L., Rocheleau, D., & Thomas-Slayter, B., pp. 214–218. London, UK: Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Solomon, J., Jacobson, S.K., Wald, K. & Gavin, M. (2007) Estimating illegal resource use at a Ugandan park with the randomized response technique. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 12: 75–88.Google Scholar
Songorwa, A.N. (1999) Community-based wildlife management (CWM) in Tanzania: are the communities interested? World Development 27: 2061–2079.Google Scholar
Struhsaker, T.T. (1981) Forest and primate conservation in East Africa. African Journal of Ecology 19: 99–144.Google Scholar
Struhsaker, T.T., Struhsaker, P.J. & Siex, K.S. (2005) Conserving Africa's rain forests: problems in protected areas and possible solutions. Biological Conservation 123: 45–54.Google Scholar
Sunderlin, W.D., Angelsen, A., Belcher, B., Burgers, P., Nasi, R., Santoso, L. & Wunder, S. (2005) Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: an overview. World Development 33: 1383–1402.Google Scholar
Treves, A., Wallace, R.B., Naughton-Treves, L. & Morales, A. (2006) Co-managing human-wildlife conflicts: a review. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 11 (6): 1–14.Google Scholar
UWA (2000) Uganda Wildlife Authority Collaborative Management Strategy. Kampala, Uganda: UWA.Google Scholar
Walters, C.J. & Holling, C.S. (1990) Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71: 2060–2068.Google Scholar
Wells, M.P., McShane, T.O., Dublin, H.T., O'Connor, S. & Redford, K. (2004) The future of integrated conservation and development projects: building on what works. In: Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work, ed. McShane, T.O. & Wells, M.P., pp. 397–401. New York. NY, USA: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wilshusen, P., Brechin, S., Fortwangler, C. & West, P. (2002) Reinventing a square wheel: critique of a resurgent ‘protection paradigm’ in international biodiversity conservation. Society and Natural Resources 15: 17–40.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Solomon online only appendix

Solomon online only appendix

Download Solomon online only appendix(File)
File 77.8 KB