Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:32:59.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Should the trade of hazardous waste be uniformly regulated? An empirical analysis of export demand for ‘waste and scrap’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2013

Daisuke Ichinose ,
Keisaku Higashida ,
Takayoshi Shinkuma  and
Michikazu Kojima
Daisuke Ichinose
Affiliation:
College of Economics, Department of Economic Policy Studies, Rikkyo University, Japan. E-mail: [email protected]
Keisaku Higashida
Affiliation:
School of Economics, Kwansei Gakuin University, Japan. E-mail: [email protected]
Takayoshi Shinkuma
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics, Kansai University, 3-3-35 Yamate-cho, Suita, Osaka 564 8680, Japan. E-mail: [email protected]
Michikazu Kojima
Affiliation:
Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization, Japan. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine the substitutability of waste and scrap exported from different countries by estimating the export demand functions of China. In particular, we focus on the export of other ferrous waste and scrap (HS code 720449) and other waste, parings and scrap of plastics (HS code 391590). It is shown that the substitutability of these wastes and scraps is weak among the exporting countries. Our empirical results imply that a uniform ban on trading hazardous waste, represented by the Basel Ban, could be an inefficient environmental policy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 18 , Issue 6 , December 2013 , pp. 773 - 793
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arize, A. (1990), ‘An econometric investigation of export behavior in seven Asian developing countries’, Applied Economics 22: 891–904.Google Scholar
Armah, B.K. and Epperson, J.E. (1997), ‘Export demand for US orange juice: impacts of US export promotion programs’, Agribusiness 13: 1–10.Google Scholar
Baggs, J. (2009), ‘International trade in hazardous waste’, Review of International Economics 17: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basel Action Network and Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition (2002), ‘Exporting harm: The high-tech trashing of Asia’, [Available at] http://www.ban.org/E-waste/technotrashfinalcomp.pdf.Google Scholar
Berglund, C. and Söderholm, P. (2003a), ‘Complementing empirical evidence on global recycling and trade of waste paper’, World Development 31: 743–754.Google Scholar
Berglund, C. and Söderholm, P. (2003b), ‘An econometric analysis of global waste paper recovery and utilization’, Environmental and Resource Economics 26: 429–456.Google Scholar
Blomberg, J. and Söderholm, P. (2009), ‘The economics of secondary aluminum supply: an econometric analysis based on European data’, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 53: 455–463.Google Scholar
Grossman, G.M. (1982), ‘Import competition from developed and developing countries’, Review of Economics and Statistics 64: 271–281.Google Scholar
Hicks, C., Dietmar, R., and Eugster, M. (2005), ‘The recycling and disposal of electrical and electronic waste in China – legislative and market responses’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25: 459–471.Google Scholar
Houthakker, H.S. and Magee, S.P. (1969), ‘Income and price elasticities in world trade’, Review of Economics and Statistics 51: 111–125.Google Scholar
Kellenberg, D. (2012), ‘Trading wastes’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 64: 68–87.Google Scholar
Khan, M.S. (1974), ‘Import and export demand in developing countries’, International Monetary Fund Staff Papers 21: 678–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, J., Haug, A., and Michelis, L. (1996), ‘Numerical distribution functions of likelihood ratio tests for cointegration’, Journal of Applied Econometrics 14: 563–577.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mio, K. (2010), ‘On the GDP of China, Report on Economy and Finance’, NLI Research Institute, [Available at] http://www.nli-research.co.jp/report/flash/2009/flash09_135.pdf [in Japanese].Google Scholar
Murray, T. and Ginman, P.J. (1976), ‘An empirical examination of the traditional aggregate import demand model’, Review of Economics and Statistics 58: 75–80.Google Scholar
Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., and Smith, R.J. (2001), ‘Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships’, Journal of Applied Econometrics 16: 289–326.Google Scholar
Ray, A. (2008), ‘Waste management in developing Asia: can trade and cooperation help?’, Journal of Environment and Development 17: 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzer, S., De Bono, A., Peduzzi, P., Giuliani, G., and Kluser, S. (2005), ‘E-waste, the hidden side of IT equipment's manufacturing and use’, Environment Alert Bulletin 5.Google Scholar
Shinkuma, T. and Huong, N.T.M. (2009), ‘The flow of e-waste material in the Asian region and a reconsideration of international trade policies on e-waste’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 29: 25–31.Google Scholar
Tegene, A. (1989), ‘On the effects of relative prices and effective exchange rates on trade flows of LDCs’, Applied Economics 21: 1447–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Beukering, P.J.H. (2001), Recycling, International Trade and the Environment: An Empirical Analysis, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Van Beukering, P.J.H. and Bouman, M.N. (2001), ‘Empirical evidence on recycling and trade of paper and lead in developed and developing countries’, World Development 29: 1717–1737.Google Scholar
Widmer, R., Oswald-Krapf, H., Sinha-Khetriwal, D., Schnellmann, M., and Boni, H. (2005), ‘Global perspectives on e-waste’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25: 436–458.Google Scholar
Wong, M.H., Wu, S.C., Deng, W.J., Yu, X.Z., Luo, Q., Leung, A.O.W., Wong, C.S.C., Luksemburg, W.J., and Wong, A.S. (2007), ‘Export of toxic chemicals – a review of the case of uncontrolled electronic-waste recycling’, Environmental Pollution 149: 131–140.Google Scholar