Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:45:57.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regulatory compliance in Lake Victoria fisheries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2009

HÅKAN EGGERT  and
RAZACK B. LOKINA
HÅKAN EGGERT
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg, Box 640, SE-405 30, Göteborg, Sweden. Email: [email protected]
RAZACK B. LOKINA
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Dar es Salaam, Box 35045, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper analyzes the causes for regulatory compliance, using traditional deterrence variables and potential moral and social variables. We use self-reported data from 459 Tanzanian artisanal fishers in Lake Victoria. The results indicate that the decision to be either a non-violator or a violator, as well as the violation rate – if the latter – are influenced by changes in deterrence variables like the probability of detection and punishment and also by legitimacy and social variables. We also identify a small group of fishers who react neither to normative aspects nor to traditional deterrence variables but persistently violate the regulation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , April 2010 , pp. 197 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akpalu, W., Eggert, H., and Vondolia, G.K. (2009), ‘Enforcement of exogenous environmental regulation, social disapproval and bribery’, Journal of Socio-Economics 38 (6): 940–45.Google Scholar
Anderson, L.G. and Lee, D.R. (1986), ‘Optimal governing instruments in natural resources regulation: the case of the fishery’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68 (4): 679–690.Google Scholar
Becker, G.S. (1968), ‘Crime and punishment: an economic approach’, Journal of Political economy 76 (2): 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brundy, A. and Pitcher, T. (1995), ‘An analysis of species changes in Lake Victoria: did the Nile perch act alone?’ in Pitcher, T.J. and Hart, P.J.B. (eds), The Impact of Species Changes in African Lakes, Fish and Fisheries Series, no. 18, London: Chapman and Hall, p. 136.Google Scholar
Clark, C.W. (1990), Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources, 2nd ed., Pure and Applied Mathematics series, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Eggert, H. and Ellergård, A. (2003), ‘Fishery control and regulation compliance: a case for co-management in Swedish commercial fisheries’, Marine Policy 27: 525–533.Google Scholar
Eggert, H. and Lokina, R. (2007), ‘Small-scale fishers and risk preferences’, Marine Resource Economics 22 (1): 49–67.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, I. (1996), ‘Crime, punishment, and the market for offenses’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (1): 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhauer, J.G. (2004), ‘Economic models of sin and remorse: some simple analytics’, Review of Social Economy 62: 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, A., Fischbacher, U., and Fehr, E. (2002), ‘Appropriating the commons: a theoretical explanation’, in Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, P., Stonich, S., and Weber, E. (eds), The Drama of the Commons, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 157–191.Google Scholar
Fehr, E. and Gächter, S. (2000a), ‘Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments’, American Economic Review 90 (4): 980–994.Google Scholar
Fehr, E. and Gächter, S. (2000b), ‘Fairness and retaliation: the economics of reciprocity’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (3): 159–181.Google Scholar
Feldman, P. (1993), The Psychology of Crime, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., and Fehr, E. (2001), ‘Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment’, Economics Letters 71: 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furlong, W.J. (1991), ‘The deterrence effect of regulatory enforcement in the fishery’, Land Economics 67: 116–129.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. (2000), Econometric Analysis, 4th ed., London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. (2002), LIMDEP Version 8.0 Reference Guide, New York: Econometric Software.Google Scholar
Hatcher, A. and Gordon, D.V. (2005), ‘Further investigations into the factors affecting compliance with UK fishing quotas’, Land Economics 81 (1): 71–86.Google Scholar
Hatcher, A., Jaffry, S., Thébaud, O., and Bennett, E. (2000), ‘Normative and social influences affecting compliance with fishery regulations’, Land Economics 76 (3): 448–461.Google Scholar
Heckman, J.J. (1979), ‘Sample selection bias as a specification error’, Econometrica 47 (1): 153–162.Google Scholar
Ikiara, M.M. (1999), ‘Sustainability, livelihoods, production and effort supply in a declining fishery: the case of Kenya's Lake Victoria fisheries’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979), ‘Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk’, Econometrica 47: 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudhongania, A.W. and Chitamwebwa, D.B.R. (1995), ‘Impact of environmental change, species introductions and ecological interactions on the fish stocks of Lake Victoria’, in Pitcher, T.J. and Hart, P.J.B. (eds), The Impact of Species Changes in African Lakes, London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 111–135.Google Scholar
Kuperan, K. and Sutinen, J.G. (1998), ‘Blue water crime: legitimacy, deterrence and compliance in fisheries’, Law and Society Review 32: 309–338.Google Scholar
Liao, T.F. (1994), ‘Interpreting Probability Models: Logit, Probit and Other Generalized Linear Models, Quantitative Application in Social Science, 07-101, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lokina, R.B. (2009), ‘Technical efficiency and skipper skill in artisanal Lake Victoria fisheries’, Environment and Development Economics 14 (4): 497–519.Google Scholar
LVFO (1999), The LVFO Strategic Vision (1999–2015) [online] http://www.lvfo.org/index.php?option=com_downloads&Itemid=62&func=download&filecatid=18.Google Scholar
LVFO (2004), ‘A Status Report on Frame Surveys’, Unpublished manuscript, LVFO Secretariat, Jinja, Uganda.Google Scholar
LVFO (2005), ‘LVFO Regional plan of action to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing on Lake Viktoria and its basin’, Unpublished manuscript, LVFO Secretariat, Jinja, Uganda.Google Scholar
Manski, C. (1978), ‘Prospect for inference on deterrence through empirical analysis of individual behavior’, in Heineke, J.M. (ed.), Economic Models of Criminal Behavior, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 83–122.Google Scholar
Milliman, S.R. (1986), ‘Optimal fishery management in the presence of illegal activity’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 13 (4): 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2000), ‘Collective action and the evolution of social norms’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 14: 137–158.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Walker, J., and Gardner, R. (1992), ‘Covenants with and without a sword: self-governance is possible’, American Political Science Review 86 (2): 404–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauly, D. (1996), ‘ITQ: the assumptions behind a meme’, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 6: 109–112.Google Scholar
Persson, M. and Siven, C.-H. (2007), ‘The Becker Paradox and Type I versus Type II errors in the economics of crime’, International Economic Review 48 (1): 211–233.Google Scholar
Robinson, P.H. and Darley, J.M. (1997), ‘The utility of desert’, Northwestern University Law Review 91: 453–499.Google Scholar
Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2002) ‘Farm strategy, self-selection and productivity: can small farming groups offer production benefits to farmers in post-socialist Romania?’ World Development 30 (10): 1737–1753.Google Scholar
Ssentongo, G.W. and Jlhuliya, J. (2000), ‘Report on the Tanzania Fisheries sector review’, Unpublished manuscript, Food and Agriculture Organization subregional office for Southern and Eastern Africa, Harare, Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
Stigler, G.J. (1970), ‘The optimum enforcement of laws’, Journal of Political Economy 78 (3): 526–536.Google Scholar
Sutinen, J. and Andersen, P. (1985), ‘The economics of fisheries law enforcement’, Land Economics 61 (12): 387–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutinen, J.G. and Gauvin, J.R. (1989), ‘An econometrics study of regulatory enforcement and compliance in the commercial inshore lobster fishery of Massachusetts’, in Neher, P., Arnason, R., and Mollet, N. (eds), Rights Based Fishing, NATO ASI Series E: Applied Sciences 169, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 415–428.Google Scholar
Sutinen, J.G. and Kuperan, K. (1999), ‘A socio-economic theory of regulatory compliance’, International journal of Social Economics 26 (1/2/3): 174–193.Google Scholar
Sutinen, J.G. and Hennessey, T.M. (1986), ‘Enforcement: the neglected element in fishery management’, in Miles, E., Pealy, R., and Stokes, R. (eds), Natural Resources Economics and Policy Applications: Essays in Honor of James A. Crutchfield, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Svensson, J. (2003), ‘Who must pay bribes and how much? Evidence from a cross section of firms’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (1): 207–230.Google Scholar
Townsend, R.E. (1986), ‘A critique of models of the American lobster fishery’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 13 (3): 277–291.Google Scholar
Transparency International (2004), ‘Corruption Perceptions Index 2004’, [online] http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2004, accessed February 5, 2008’.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1992), ‘Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5: 297–323.Google Scholar
Tyler, T.R. (1990), Why People Obey the Law, London and New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tyran, J.R. and Feld, L. (2006), ‘Achieving compliance when legal sanctions are non-deterrent’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 108 (1): 135–156.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme (2002)–2006, State of the Environment and Policy Retrospective: 1972–2002 in Global Environment Outlook 3, chap 2, [online] http://www.unep.org/GEO/geo3/english/081.htm, accessed February 5, 2008.Google Scholar
Walker, J., Gardner, R., and Ostrom, E. (1990), ‘Rent dissipation in a limited-access common-pool resource: experimental evidence’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 19: 203–211.Google Scholar
Wilson, D.C. (1993), ‘Fisheries management on Lake Victoria, Tanzania’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the African Studies Association, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, December 4–7.Google Scholar
World Bank (2002), Linking Poverty Reduction and Environmental Management: Policy Challenges and Opportunities, Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar