Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:43:56.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Infectious disease, development, and climate change: a scenario analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2007

RICHARD S.J. TOL ,
KRISTIE L. EBI  and
GARY W. YOHE
RICHARD S.J. TOL
Affiliation:
Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, Ireland Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
KRISTIE L. EBI
Affiliation:
ESS LLC, Alexandria, VA, USA
GARY W. YOHE
Affiliation:
Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study the effects of development and climate change on infectious diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa. Infant mortality and infectious disease are closely related, but there are better data for the former. In an international cross-section, per capita income, literacy, and absolute poverty significantly affect infant mortality. We use scenarios of these three determinants and of climate change to project the future incidence of malaria, assuming it to change proportionally to infant mortality. Malaria deaths will first increase, because of population growth and climate change, but then fall, because of development. This pattern is robust to the choice of scenario, parameters, and starting conditions; and it holds for diarrhoea, schistosomiasis, and dengue fever as well. However, the timing and level of the mortality peak is very sensitive to assumptions. Climate change is important in the medium term, but dominated in the long term by development. As climate can only be changed with a substantial delay, development is the preferred strategy to reduce infectious diseases even if they are exacerbated by climate change. Development can, in particular, support the needed strengthening of disease control programs in the short run and thereby increase the capacity to cope with projected increases in infectious diseases over the medium to long term. This conclusion must, however, be viewed with caution, because development, even of the sort envisioned in the underlying socio-economic scenarios, is by no means certain.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 12 , Issue 5: SPECIAL ISSUE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES , October 2007 , pp. 687 - 706
Copyright
2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Three anonymous referees had very helpful comments. This paper would not have been possible without the series of Climate Change Impacts and Integrated Assessment meetings at Snowmass, masterly organized by Susan Sweeney and John Weyant of the Energy Modelling Forum. Financial support by the European Commission DG Research (ENSEMBLES), the Hamburg University Innovation Fund, and the Princeton Environmental Institute is gratefully acknowledged. All errors and opinions are ours.