Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:36:30.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A capital scarcity theory of the environmental Kuznets curve

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2009

ARIASTER B. CHIMELI  and
JOHN B. BRADEN
ARIASTER B. CHIMELI
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Bentley Hall Annex, Athens, OH 45701. Email: [email protected]
JOHN B. BRADEN
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper offers a theory of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) based on the scarcity of capital relative to environmental quality. In a unified treatment of both market and transition economies of the former Soviet Bloc, we characterize a dynamic economy subject to two sources of market failure: a pollution externality and a pure public good ‘environmental quality’. We derive a policy rule to implement the social optimum in market and transition economies and show how, in general, a pollution tax or tradable permits can only implement the social optimum if accompanied by other taxes on consumption or profits.

Type
Research Article
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 14 , Issue 5 , October 2009 , pp. 541 - 564
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andreoni, J. and Levinson, A. (2001), ‘The simple analytics of the Environmental Kuznets Curve’, Journal of Public Economics 80 (2): 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R.J. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995), Economic Growth, McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Bohn, H. and Deacon, R.T. (2000), ‘Ownership risk, investment, and the use of natural resources’, American Economic Review 90 (3): 526–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovenberg, A. Lans and Smulders, S. (1996), ‘Transitional impacts of environmental policy in an endogenous growth model’, International Economic Review 37 (4): 861–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, W.A. and Taylor, M.S. (2003), ‘The kindergarten rule of sustainable growth’, NBER Working Paper No. W9597.Google Scholar
Brock, W.A. and Taylor, M.S. (2005), ‘Economic growth and the environment: a review of theory and empirics’, in Durlauf, S. and Aghion, P. (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Chichilnisky, G. (1994), ‘North-south trade and the global environment'’, American Economic Review 84 (4): 851–894.Google Scholar
Chimeli, A.B. (2003), ‘Optimal dynamics of environmental quality in economies in transition’, The Economics of Transition 11 (1): 123–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denison, E.F. (1985), ‘Trends in American economic growth, 1929–1982’, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Ferrero, M. (1999), ‘Heavy investment and high pollution as rational choices under socialism’, European Journal of Political Economy 15 (2): 257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, B.A. (1973)a, ‘Optimal capital accumulation in a polluted environment’, Southern Economic Journal 39 (4): 544–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, B.A. (1973)b, ‘Optimal consumption planning in a polluted environment’, The Economic Record 49 (128): 534–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G.M. and Krueger, A.B. (1995), ‘Economic growth and the environment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (2): 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbaugh, W.T, Levinson, A., and Wilson, D.M. (2002), ‘Reexamining the empirical evidence for an Environmental Kuznets Curve’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84 (3): 541–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, A. and Pecchenino, R. (1994), ‘An overlapping generations model of growth and the environment’, The Economic Journal 104 (427): 1393–1410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W. and Wilcoxen, P.J. (1990), ‘Environmental regulation and US economic growth’, The RAND Journal of Economics 21 (2): 314–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khanna, M. and Zilberman, D. (1999), ‘Freer markets and the abatement of carbon emissions: the electricity-generating sector in India’, Resources and Energy Economics 21 (2): 125–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieb, C.M. (2002), ‘The Environmental Kuznets Curve and satiation: a simple static model’, Environment and Development Economics 7 (3): 429–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, J.A. and Kunce, M. (2000), ‘Environmental protection and economic growth: what do the residuals tell us?’, Land Economics 76 (2): 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, R. (1994), ‘The environment as a factor of production: the effects of economic growth and trade liberalization’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27 (2): 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millimet, D.L., List, J.A., and Stengos, T. (2003), ‘The Environmental Kuznets Curve: real progress or misspecified models?’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (4): 1038–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfaff, A., Chaudhuri, S., and Nye, H.L.M. (2004)a, ‘Endowments, preferences, technologies and abatement: growth–environment microfoundations’, International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 4 (4): 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfaff, A., Chaudhuri, S., and Nye, H.L.M. (2004)b, ‘Household production and Environmental Kuznets Curves: examining the desirability and feasibility of substitution’, Environmental and Resource Economics 27 (2): 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portney, P.E. (ed.) (1990), Public Policies for Environmental Protection, Washington, DC: Resources For the Future.Google Scholar
Repetto, R., Rotham, D., Faeth, P., and Austin, D. (1996), ‘Has environmental protection really reduced productivity growth?’, Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reppelin-Hill, V. (1999), ‘Trade and the environment: an empirical analysis of the technology effect in the steel industry’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38 (3): 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargent, T.J. (1993), Bounded Rationality in Macroeconomics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selden, T.M. and Song, D. (1995), ‘Neoclassical growth, the J curve for abatement, and the inverted U curve for pollution’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29 (2): 162–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, D.I. and Common, M.S. (2001), ‘Is there an Environmental Kuznets Curve for sulfur?’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41 (2): 162–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokey, N.L. (1998), ‘Are there limits to growth?’, International Economic Review 39 (1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Bureau of the Census (1996), ‘Current industrial reports: pollution abatement cost and expenditures, 1994’, MA200(94)-1, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987), Our Common Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Resources Institute (1996), ‘World Resources 1996–97 database’, World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Zylicz, T. (1998), ‘Environmental policy in economies in transition’, in Tietenberg, T. and Folmer, H. (eds.), The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, 1998/1999: A Survey of Current Issues, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar