Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:34:50.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Eisenhower versus the Spin-off Story: Did the Rise of the Military–Industrial Complex Hurt or Help America's Commercial Aircraft Industry?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Eugene Gholz
Eugene Gholz*
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin, P.O. Box Y, Austin, TX 78713-8925. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In his Farewell Address, President Eisenhower warned that the military-industrial complex (MIC) threatened to dominate American research, crowding out commercial innovation. Ironically, a number of analysts point to spin-off benefits of the 1950s' military effort as a crucial source of American high-tech competitiveness, often citing the key example of the relationship between military jet aircraft and the Boeing's 707. But the huge military investment in jet aviation had both benefits and costs for the commercial industry. This article compares the development of the Boeing 707 and its relationship to military projects like the KC-135 tanker to the contemporary development of commercial jet aircraft by other companies that were also integral parts of the military-industrial complex (MIC), including Douglas Aircraft and its commercial DC-8 and Convair and its commercial 880 and 990. Using evidence from archives, interviews with retired company executives, contemporary trade press, and academic studies, the article concludes that membership in the MIC did not offer firms a leg up in commercial markets. President Eisenhower was generally right about the costs of the military effort, but military spending remained low enough to allow commercial industry to thrive in parallel to the defense industry.

Type
Introduction
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 46 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2011. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Aircraft Industries Association. Aircraft Year Book, 1957–1958. Washington, DC: American Aviation Publications, 1958.Google Scholar
Alic, John A. Trillions for Military Technology: How the Pentagon Innovates and Why It Costs So Much. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2007.Google Scholar
Alic, J.A., Branscomb, L.M., Carter, A.B. and Epstein, G.L.. Beyond Spinoff: Military and Commercial Technologies in a Changing World. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Boger, Dan, Greer, W.R. and Liao, S.S.. Competitive Weapon Systems Acquisition: Myths and Facts. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School, 1989.Google Scholar
Brealey, Richard A., and Myers, Stewart C.. Principles of Corporate Finance, international edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1996.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael. Flying Blind: The Politics of the Strategic Bomber Program. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc. Trade Warriors: States, Firms, and Strategic Trade Policy in High Technology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Cook, William H. The Road to the 707. Bellevue, WA: TYC Publishing, 1991.Google Scholar
Cooper, Neil. The Business of Death: Britain’s Arms Trade at Home and Abroad. London: Tauris Academic Publishers, 1997.Google Scholar
Council on Competitiveness. “U.S. R & D Policy for Competitiveness Sector Study: Aircraft.” In Endless Frontier, Limited Resources (April, 1996), 8.Google Scholar
Davies, R.E.G. A History of the World’s Airlines. New York: Oxford University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Drezner, Jeffrey A., Giles K., Smith, Lucille E., Horgan, Curt, Rogers, and Schmidt, Rachel. Maintaining Future Military Aircraft Design Capability. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1992.Google Scholar
Eddy, Paul, Elaine, Potter, and Bruce, Page. Destination Disaster: From the TriMotor to the DC-10: The Risk of Flying. New York: Quadrangle, the New York Times Book Company, 1976.Google Scholar
Ellison, A.P., and Stafford, E.M.. The Dynamics of the Civil Aviation Industry. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1974.Google Scholar
Flamm, Kenneth. Creating the Computer: Government, Industry, and High Technology. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1988.Google Scholar
Francillon, RenéJ. McDonnell Douglas Aircraft since 1920, vol. 1, 2nd ed. London: Putnam, 1988.Google Scholar
Franklin, Roger. The Defender. New York: Harper & Row, 1987.Google Scholar
Gansler, Jacques S. Affording Defense. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Gansler, Jacques S. Defense Conversion: Transforming the Arsenal of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Gandt, Robert. Skygods: The Fall of Pan Am. New York: William Morrow and Company, 1995.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jacob. Brotherhood of Arms: General Dynamics and the Business of Defending America. New York: Times Books, 1985.Google Scholar
Gunston, Bill. World Encyclopedia of Aircraft Manufacturers. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Hastings, Stephen. The Murder of the TSR-2. London: MacDonald, 1966.Google Scholar
Hayward, Keith. Government and British Civil Aerospace: A Case Study in Post-War Technology Policy. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Hayward, Keith. International Collaboration in Civil Aerospace. London: Frances Pinter Publishers, 1986.Google Scholar
Hayward, Keith. The British Aircraft Industry. New York: Manchester University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Heppenheimer, Thomas A. Turbulent Skies: The History of Commercial Aviation. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1995.Google Scholar
Ingells, Douglas J. The McDonnell Douglas Story. Fallbrook, CA: Aero Publishers, 1979.Google Scholar
Irving, Clive. Wide-Body: The Triumph of the 747. New York: William Morrow & Company, 1993.Google Scholar
Jane’s All the World’s Aircraft, 1958–1959. London: The Trade Press Association, 1958.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. Peddling Prosperity: Economic Sense and Nonsense in the Age of Diminished Expectations. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1994.Google Scholar
Lecuyer, Christophe. Making Silicon Valley: Innovation and the Growth of High Tech, 1930–1970. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Leslie, Stuart W. The Cold War and American Science: The Military-Industrial-Academic Complex at MIT and Stanford. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Lynn, Matthew. Birds of Prey: Boeing vs. Airbus: A Battle for the Skies, revised edition. New York: Four Walls Eight Windows, 1997.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Harold. Billion Dollar Battle: The Story Behind the ‘Impossible’ 727 Project. New York: David McKay Company, 1965.Google Scholar
Marck, Bernard. Dassault, Douglas, Boeing, et les autres …: La Guerre des Monopoles. Paris, France: Editions Jean Picollec, 1980.Google Scholar
Markusen, Ann and Yudken, Joel. Dismantling the Cold War Economy. New York: Basic Books, 1992.Google Scholar
McGuire, Steven. Airbus Industrie: Conflict and Cooperation in US-EC Trade Relations. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1997.Google Scholar
McNaugher, Thomas L. New Weapons Old Politics: America’s Military Procurement Muddle. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1989.Google Scholar
Miller, Ronald and Sawers, David. The Technical Development of Modern Aviation. New York: Praeger, 1968.Google Scholar
Mowery, David C. Alliance Politics and Economics: Multinational Joint Ventures in Commercial Aircraft. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1987.Google Scholar
Mowery, David C. and Rosenberg, Nathan. Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Muller, Pierre. Airbus: L’Ambition Européenne. Paris, France: L’Harmattan, 1989.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard R. High-Technology Policies: A Five-Nation Comparison. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1984.Google Scholar
Newhouse, John. The Sporty Game. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1982.Google Scholar
Phillips, Almarin. Technology and Market Structure: A Study of the Aircraft Industry. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company, 1971.Google Scholar
Porter, Michael E. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Press, Daryl G. Calculating Credibility: How Leaders Assess Military Threats. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Proctor, Jon. Convair 880 & 990. Hong Kong: World Transport Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Eugene. Flying High: The Story of Boeing and the Rise of the Jetliner Industry. New York: The Atlantic Monthly Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Rosen, Stephen P. Winning the Next War: Innovation and the Modern Military. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Samuels, Richard J. “Rich Nation, Strong Army:” National Security and the Technological Transformation of Japan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Scherer, Frederic M. The Weapons Acquisition Process: Economic Incentives. Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1964.Google Scholar
Sharkey, William W. The Theory of Natural Monopoly. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Straszheim, Mahlon R. The International Airline Industry. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1969.Google Scholar
Thornton, David Weldon. Airbus Industrie: The Politics of an International Industrial Collaboration. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Tyson, Karen W., J. Richard Nelson, Neang I. Om and Palmer, Paul R.. Acquiring Major Systems: Cost and Schedule Trends and Acquisition Initiative Effectiveness. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analysis, 1989.Google Scholar
Tyson, Laura. Who’s Bashing Whom? Trade Conflict in High-Technology Industries. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 1992.Google Scholar
Vambery, Robert G. Capital Investment Control in the Air Transport Industry. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1976.Google Scholar
Van Evera, Stephen. Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Waddington, Terry. Douglas DC-8. Miami, FL: World Transport Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Wegg, John. General Dynamics Aircraft and their Predecessors. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Weingarten, Joe. The Impact of Military Aviation on Civilian Aircraft Development: Evolution of the Boeing 386 Dash 80, KC-135 and Boeing 707. Dayton, OH: Huffman-Wright Institute for Aerospace Research, 1994.Google Scholar

Articles and Essays

Borrus, Michael. “Investing on the Frontier: How the U.S. Can Reclaim HighTech Leadership.” The American Prospect 11 (1992): 79–87.Google Scholar
Branscomb, Lewis M., and Parker, George. “Funding Civilian and Dual-Use Industrial Technology.” In Empowering Technology: Implementing a U.S. Strategy, ed. Branscomb, Lewis M., 64–102. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Burnett, William B., and Scherer, Frederick M. “The Weapons Industry.” In The Structure of American Industry, ed. Adams, Walter, 289–317. New York, 1990.Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash K., and Grossman, Gene M. “Targeted Export Promotion with Several Oligopolistic Industries.” Journal of International Economics 21 (1986): 233–l49.Google Scholar
Fabrizio, Kira R., and Mowery, David C. “The Federal Role in Financing Major Innovations: Information Technology during the Postwar Period.” In Financing Innovation in the United States, 1870 to the Present, eds. Lamoreaux, Naomi R. and Sokoloff, Kenneth L. 283–316. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Golich, Vicki L. “From Competition to Collaboration: The Challenge of Commercial-Class Aircraft Manufacturing.” International Organization 46, no. 4 (1992):899–934.Google Scholar
Hartley, Keith and Corcoran, W. “The Time-Cost Trade-Off for Airliners.” Journal of Industrial Economics 26, no. 3 (1978): 209–22.Google Scholar
Heinrich, Thomas. “Cold War Armory: Military Contracting in Silicon Valley.” Enterprise and Society 3 (2002): 247–84.Google Scholar
Hooks, Gregory. “The Danger of an Autarkic Pentagon: Updating Eisenhower’s Warning of the Military-Industrial Complex.” In The Military-Industrial Complex: Eisenhower’s Warning Three Decades Later, eds. Walker, Gregg B. Bella, David A. and Sprecher, Steven J. 129–80. New York: Peter Lang, 1993.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Mary and Schméder, Geneviève. “New Issues.” In The European Rupture: The Defence Sector in Transition, eds. Kaldor, Mary and Schméder, Geneviève, 23–42. Lyme, NH: Edward Elgar Publishing, 1997.Google Scholar
March, Artemis. “The US Commercial Aircraft Industry and its Foreign Competitors.” MIT Commission on Industrial Productivity Working Paper, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Mayer, Kenneth R. “Combat Aircraft Production in the United States 19502000: Maintaining Industry Capability in an Era of Shrinking Budgets.” Defense Analysis 9, no. 2 (1993): 159–69.Google Scholar
Neu, Werner Karl-Heinz, Neumann, and Schnöring, Thomas. “Trade Patterns, Industry Structure and Industrial Policy in Telecommunications.” Telecommunications Policy 11, no. 1 (1987): 31–44.Google Scholar
Olienyk, John and Carbaugh, Robert. “Competition in the World Jetliner Industry.” Challenge 42, no. 4 (1999): 60–81.Google Scholar
Rogerson, William P. “Economic Incentives and the Defense Procurement Process.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, no. 4 (1994): 65–90.Google Scholar
Sapolsky, Harvey M. “Equipping the Armed Forces.” In National Security and the U.S. Constitution, eds. Edwards, George and Walker, W. Earl 121–35. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins, 1988.Google Scholar
Spradlin, Shane. “The Aircraft Subsidies Dispute in the GATT’s Uruguay Round.” Journal of Air Law and Commerce 60 (1995): 1191–1220.Google Scholar
Usselman, Steven W. “Learning the Hard Way: IBM and the Sources of Innovation in Early Computing.” In Financing Innovation in the United States, 1870 to the Present, eds. Lamoreaux, Naomi R. and Sokoloff, Kenneth L. 317–63. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Magazines and Newspapers

“… And It Is Still the Right Size.” Flight 81 (January 18, 1962), 82.Google Scholar
“Aviation: U.S. Lags on Jets.” Business Week (June 23, 1951), 87–8.Google Scholar
Balentine, Richard. “Turboprop Transport Battle Heightens.” Aviation Week (May 31, 1954), 67.Google Scholar
“Boeing Cancels Planned Production Rise.” Aviation Week (December 5, 1966), 37.Google Scholar
“Boeing Soars Ahead of Douglas in the Jet Race.” Business Week (February 11, 1961), 64.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, Robert. “Caravelle Makes Big Hit at Varig.” Airlift (June, 1960), 59.Google Scholar
“Capital Buy 880s.” Flight 73 (January 31, 1958), 157.Google Scholar
“Corporation Revelations.” Flight 81 (March 29, 1962), 465.Google Scholar
“Douglas: Two-Way Bet to Ride a Boom.” Business Week (July 16, 1955), 86.Google Scholar
“Eastern Air Lines Cuts Some Flights, Cites Delay in Jet Delivery.” Wall Street Journal (June 15, 1966), 17.Google Scholar
Hotz, Robert. “Boeing Gets Order for 88 Jet Tankers.” Aviation Week (August 23, 1954), 13–14.Google Scholar
Ingram, Donald A. “America’s Turbine Transport Progress.” Flight 74 (December 19, 1958), 949.Google Scholar
“Jet Prices Too High: Littlewood.” Aviation Week (December 22, 1952), 17.Google Scholar
“Jet Transport Race Enters the Stretch.” Aviation Week (June 13, 1955), 142.Google Scholar
Johnsen, Katherine. “Impact of Boeing Profit Ruling Weighed.” Aviation Week (January 22, 1962), 32.Google Scholar
“Pratt & Whitney feels the pangs of success.” Business Week (August 6, 1966), 139.Google Scholar
Ramsden, JM. “The Case for the Comet.“ Flight 74 (August 22, 1958), 256.Google Scholar
“Refueling Problem.” Aviation Week (October 12, 1953), 13.Google Scholar
“Jets for European Carriers Delayed by Viet War Needs.” Aviation Week (October 31, 1966), 37.Google Scholar
“Tanker Competition.” Aviation Week (August 9, 1954), 9.Google Scholar
“Trouble for Boeing.” Business Week (September 16, 1950), 25.Google Scholar

Government Documents

House of Commons, Trade and Industry Committee. Third Report, British Aerospace Industry, vol. 1. London: HMSO, July 1, 1993.Google Scholar
National Research Council. The Competitive Status of the U.S. Civil Aviation Manufacturing Industry: A Study of the Influences of Technology in Determining International Industrial Competitive Advantage. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Conflict and Cooperation in National Competition for High-Technology Industry. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Competing Economies: America, Europe, and the Pacific Rim. Washington, DC: GPO, October, 1991.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Assessing the Potential for Civil-Military Integration: Technologies, Processes, and Practices. Washington, DC: GPO, September, 1994.Google Scholar
“U.S. Government Response to the EC-Commissioned Report ‘U.S. Government Support of the U.S. Commercial Aircraft Industry’.” Reprinted in the Report of the Industry Sector and Functional Advisory Committees. The Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations. January, 1994.Google Scholar
U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Armed Services. “Investigation of the B-36 Bomber Program.” Hearings (August 12, 1949).Google Scholar
U.S. International Trade Commission. Global Competitiveness of U.S. Advanced-Technology Manufacturing Industries: Large Civil Aircraft. Investigation No. 332-332, Publication 2667. Washington, DC; GPO, August, 1993.Google Scholar

Unpublished Works

Arnold, and Porter, . U.S. Government Support of the U.S. Commercial Aircraft Industry. November. 1991.Google Scholar
Barton, J.W. “Factors Influencing Airplane Costs.” Paper presented at the SAE National Aeronautics Meeting, New York City, April 22, 1953.Google Scholar
Raymond, Arthur James. “Applicability of Toyota Production System to Commercial Airplane Manufacturing.” Master’s Thesis, MIT, May, 1992.Google Scholar

Online Sources

Eisenhower, Dwight D. “Farewell Radio and Television Address to the American People, January 17, 1961.” Dwight, D. Eisenhower Presidential Library and Museum.http://www.eisenhower.archives.gov/All_About_Ike/Speeches/FarewellAddress.pdf (accessed January 6, 2010).Google Scholar

Archival Sources

Boeing Archives, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
British National Archives, Kew Gardens.Google Scholar
Greene, Warren E. The Development of the B-52 Aircraft, 1945-1953. Originally Secret, May, 1956. Historical Branch, Office of Information Services, Wright Air Development Center, Dayton, Ohio.Google Scholar
History of the KC-135A Airplane, 1953–1958, Volume 1: text, Originally Secret, Historical Study No. 320, June, 1959, Microfilm Roll 23711, K201.95-K201.323, Air Force Archives, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama.Google Scholar