Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:34:43.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chandler in a Larger Frame: Markets, Transaction Costs, and Organizational Form in History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Richard N. Langlois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1977, when Alfred D. Chandler's pathbreaking book The Visible Hand appeared, the large, vertically integrated, “Chandlerian” corporation had dominated the organizational landscape for nearly a century. In some interpretations, possibly including Chandler's own, The Visible Hand and subsequent works constitute a triumphalist account of the rise of that organizational form: the large, vertically integrated firm arose and prospered because of its inherent superiority, in all times and places, to more decentralized, market-oriented production arrangements. A quarter century later, however, the Chandlerian firm no longer dominates the landscape. It is under siege from a panoply of decentralized and market-like forms that often resemble some of the “inferior” nineteenth-century structures that the managerial enterprise had replaced.

Type
Symposium: Framing Business History
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 355 - 375
Copyright
Enterprise & Society, Vol. 5 No. 3, © the Business History Conference 2004; all rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Carlton, Dennis W., and Perloff, Jeffrey M.. Modern Industrial Organization. 3d ed. 1994; Reading, Mass., 1999.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., Inventing the Electronic Century: The Epic Story of the Consumer Electronics and Computer Industries. New York, 2001.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, Mass., 1977.Google Scholar
Cronon, William. Nature’s Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West. New York, 1991.Google Scholar
Cyert, Richard M., and March, James G.. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1963.Google Scholar
Galbraith, Jay. Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, Mass., 1973.Google Scholar
Helpman, Elhanan, ed. General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. Cambridge, Mass., 1998.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul. Geography and Trade. Cambridge, Mass., 1991.Google Scholar
Langlois, Richard N., and Robertson, Paul L.. Firms, Markets, and Economic Change: A Dynamic Theory of Business Institutions. London, 1995.Google Scholar
Lazonick, William. Business Organization and the Myth of the Market Economy. Cambridge, U.K., 1991.Google Scholar
Milgrom, Paul J., and Roberts, John D.. Economics, Organization, and Management. New York, 1992.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard R., and Winter, Sidney G.. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass., 1982.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York, 1981.Google Scholar
Penrose, Edith T. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford, U.K., 1959.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael. Personal Knowledge. Chicago, 1958.Google Scholar
Thompson, James D. Organizations in Action. New York, 1967.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York, 1985.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York, 1975.Google Scholar

Articles and Essays

Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., “Organizational Capabilities and the Economic History of the Industrial Enterprise.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 6 (Summer 1992): 79–100.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica, n.s., 4 (Nov. 1937): 386–405.Google Scholar
David, Paul A. “Why Are Institutions the ‘Carriers of History’? Path Dependence and the Evolution of Conventions, Organizations, and Institutions.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 5 (Dec. 1994): 205-20.Google Scholar
Demsetz, Harold. “The Theory of the Firm Revisited.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 4 (Spring 1988): 141-61.Google Scholar
Feenstra, Robert C. “Integration of Trade and Disintegration of Production in the Global Economy.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (Fall 1998): 31–50.Google Scholar
Hitt, Lorin M. “Information Technology and Firm Boundaries: Evidence from Panel Data.” Information Systems Research 10 (June 1999): 134-49.Google Scholar
Jack, Andrew B. “The Channels of Distribution for an Innovation: The Sewing Machine Industry in America, 1860-1865.” Explorations in Entrepreneurial History 9 (Feb. 1957): 133-41.Google Scholar
Kim, Sukkoo. “Markets and Multiunit Firms from an American Historical Perspective,” Advances in Strategic Management 18 (June 2001): 305-26.Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi R., Raff, Daniel M. G., and Temin, Peter. “Beyond Markets and Hierarchies: Toward a New Synthesis of American Business History.” American Historical Review 108 (April 2003): 404-33.Google Scholar
Langlois, Richard N. “Digital Technology and Economic Growth: The History of Semiconductors and Computers.” In Technological Innovation and Economic Performance, ed. Steil, Benn, Victor, David, and Nelson, Richard R.. Princeton, N.J., 2002, pp. 265-84.Google Scholar
Langlois, Richard N. “External Economies and Economic Progress: The Case of the Microcomputer Industry.” Business History Review 66 (Spring 1992): 1–50.Google Scholar
Langlois, Richard N. “Rationality, Institutions, and Explanation.” In Economics as a Process: Essays in the New Institutional Economics, ed. Langlois, Richard N.. New York, 1986, pp. 225-55.Google Scholar
Langlois, Richard N. “Scale, Scope, and the Reuse of Knowledge.” In Economic Organization and Economic Knowledge: Essays in Honour of Brian J. Loasby, ed.Dow, Sheila C. and Earl, Peter E.. Cheltenham, U.K., 1999, pp. 239-54.Google Scholar
Langlois, Richard N. “Transaction-cost Economics in Real Time.” Industrial and Corporate Change 1 (1992): 99–127.Google Scholar
Langlois, Richard N. “The Vanishing Hand: The Changing Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism.” Industrial and Corporate Change 12 (April 2003): 351-85.Google Scholar
Langlois, Richard N., and Everett, Michael J.. “What Is Evolutionary Economics?” In Evolutionary and Neo-Schumpeterian Approaches to Economics, ed. Magnusson, Lars. Dordrecht, Neth., 1994, pp. 11–47.Google Scholar
Langlois, Richard N., and Foss, Nicolai J.. “Capabilities and Governance: The Rebirth of Production in the Theory of Economic Organization.” Kyklos 52 (1999): 201-18.Google Scholar
Langlois, Richard N., and Robertson, Paul L.. “Explaining Vertical Integration: Lessons from the American Automobile Industry.” Journal of Economic History 49 (June 1989): 361-75.Google Scholar
Langlois, Richard N., and Robertson, Paul L.. “Networks and Innovation in a Modular System: Lessons from the Microcomputer and Stereo Component Industries.” Research Policy 21 (Aug. 1992): 297–313.Google Scholar
Langlois, Richard N., and Edward Steinmueller, W.. “The Evolution of Competitive Advantage in the Worldwide Semiconductor Industry, 1947-1996.” In The Sources of Industrial Leadership, ed. Mowery, David C. and Nelson, Richard R.. New York, 1999, pp. 19–78.Google Scholar
Loasby, Brian J. “Firms, Markets, and the Principle of Continuity.” In Centenary Essays on Alfred Marshall, ed. Whitaker, J. K. Cambridge, U.K., 1990, pp. 108-26.Google Scholar
Malone, Thomas W., Yates, Joanne, and Benjamin, Robert I.. “Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies.” Communications of the ACM 30 (June 1987): 484-97.Google Scholar
Richardson, G. B. “The Organization of Industry.” Economic Journal 82 (Sept. 1972): 883-96.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Zeitlin, Jonathan. “Historical Alternatives to Mass Production: Politics, Markets, and Technology in Nineteenth-Century Industrialization.” Past and Present 108 (Aug. 1985): 133-76.Google Scholar
Müfit, Sabooglu, and Langlois, Richard N.. “Knowledge and Meliorism in the Evolutionary Theory of F. A. Hayek” In Evolutionary Economics: Program and Scope, ed. Dopfer, Kurt. Dordrecht, Neth., 2001, pp. 231-51.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. “The Corporation: Will It Be Managed by Machines?” In Management and the Corporations, 1985, ed. Anshen, M. L. and Bach, G. L. New York, 1960, pp. 17–55.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. “The Division of Labor Is Limited by the Extent of the Market.” Journal of Political Economy 59 (June 1951): 185-93.Google Scholar
Sturgeon, Timothy J. “Modular Production Networks. A New American Model of Industrial Organization.” Industrial and Corporate Change 11 (June 2002): 451-96.Google Scholar
Tushman, Michael L., and Anderson, Philip. “Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments.” Administrative Science Quarterly 31 (Sept. 1986): 439-65.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. “The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes.” Journal of Economic Literature 19 (Dec. 1981): 1537-68.Google Scholar
Zenger, Todd R., and Hesterly, William S.. “The Disaggregation of Corporations: Selective Intervention, High-Powered Incentives, and Molecular Units.” Organization Science 8 (May-June 1997): 209-22.Google Scholar

Unpublished Works

Baldwin, John R., Beckstead, Desmond, and Caves, Richard E.. “Changes in the Diversification of Canadian Manufacturing Firms (1973-1997): A Move to Specialization.” Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch, Research Paper no. 179. 2002.Google Scholar
Jacobides, Michael G. “Why Do Markets Emerge? Organizational Unbundling and Vertical Dis-Integration in Mortgage Banking.” London Business School, Centre for the Network Economy Working Paper. 2003.Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi R., Raff, Daniel M. G., and Temin, Peter. “Beyond Markets and Hierarchies: Toward a New Synthesis of American Business History.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper no. 9029. July 2002.Google Scholar