Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:00:51.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Visual Movement Imagery in Kinaesthetic Sensitivity and Motor Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2015

D.J. Livesey  and
M. Kangas
D.J. Livesey*
Affiliation:
The University of Sydney
M. Kangas
Affiliation:
The University of Sydney
*
Department of Psychology, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The relationship between vividness of visual movement imagery and performance on tests of kinaesthetic sensitivity was examined in high school students by comparing performance on three tests of kinaesthesis by high and low imagery students, selected using the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire. High imagers performed significantly better than low imagers when relying on kinaesthetic information. Level of movement imagery predicted performance on a motor task (a manual placement task) when the task was performed in the absence of visual cues (blindfolded). These results reflect the reliance on visual information when performing motor tasks and indicate that, in the absence of visual cues, such information is created from kinaesthetic input via visual imagery. This has important implications for our understanding of the development of kinaesthesis and motor control and may contribute to the development of remedial programmes for children with poor motor ability.

Keywords

AdolescentsImageryKinaestheticsMovementRemediationVisual Information
Type
Research Article
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , May 1997 , pp. 2 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chicoine, A.J., Lassonde, M., & Proteau, L. (1992). Developmental aspects of sensorimotor integration. Developmental Neuropsychology, 8, 381–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doheny, M.O. (1993). Effects of mental practice on performance of a psychomotor siali. Journal of Mental Imagery, 17,111–118.Google Scholar
Goss, S., Hall, C, Buckholtz, E., & Fishburne, G. (1986). Imagery ability and the acquisition and retention of movements. Memory and Cognition, 14,469–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, C., & Goss, S. (1985). Imagery research in motor learning. In Goodman, D., Wilberg, R.B., & Franks, I.M. (Eds.), Differing perspectives in motor learning, memory, and control (pp. 139–154). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harshman, R.A. (1991). “Paradoxical” sex differences in self-reported imagery. In Pavio, A. (Ed.), Images in mind: The evolution of a theory (pp. 298–316). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Henderson, S.E. (1993). Motor development and minor handicap. In Kalverboer, A.F., Hopkin, B., & Geuze, R. (Eds.), Motor development in early and later childhood: Longitudinal approaches (pp. 286–307). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, A., Marks, D.F, & Russell, D.G. (1986). An instrument for assessing imagery of movement: The vividness of movement imagery questionnaire (VMIQ). Journal of Mental Imagery, 70, 23–30.Google Scholar
Juurma, J., & Lehtinen-Railo, S. (1988). Cross-modal transfer of forms between vision and touch. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 29, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, R.M., & Posner, M.I. (1974). Attention to visual and kinaesthetic components of skills. Brain Research, 71,401–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laszlo, J.I., & Bairstow, P.J. (1985). Perceptual-motor behaviour: Developmental assessment and therapy. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Lautrey, J., & Chartier, D. (1991). A developmental approach to mental imagery. In Cornoldi, C. & McDaniel, M.A. (Eds.), Imagery and cognition (pp. 247–282). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livesey, D.J., & Intili, D. (1996). A gender difference in visual-spatial ability in four year old children: Effects on performance of a kinaesthetic acuity task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 436–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livesey, D.J., & Parkes, N. (1995). Testing kinaesthetic acuity in preschool children. The Australian Journal of Psychology, 47, 3, 160–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manyam, V.J., & Laszlo, J.I. (1989). Visual-kinaesthetic intermodal relations. In Vickers, D. & Smith, P.L. (Eds.), Human information processing: Measures, mechanisms, and models, (pp. 43–45). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Marks, D.F. (1983). Mental imagery and consciousness: A theoretical review. In Sheikh, A.A. (Ed.), Imagery: Current theory, research, and application. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Millar, S. (1990). Imagery and blindness. In Hampson, P.J., Marks, D.F., & Richardson, J.T.E. (Eds.), Imagery: Current developments (pp. 129–149). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Murphy, S.M., & Jowdy, D.P. (1992). Imagery and mental practice. In Horn, T.S. (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology (pp. 221–250). Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Pick, H.L. (1974). Visual encoding of non-visual spatial information. In Macleod, R.B. & Pick, H.L. (Eds.), Perception: Essays in honour of J. Gibson (pp. 153–165). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, M.I., & Konick, A.F. (1966). Short term retention of visual and kinaesthetic information. Organisational Behaviour and Human Performance, 1, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proteau, L. (1992). On the specificity of learning and the role of visual information for movement control. In Proteau, L. & Elliott, D. (Eds), Vision and motor control (pp. 67–103). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Reeve, T.G., Mackey, L.J., & Fober, G.W. (1986). Visual dominance in the cross-modal kinaesthetic plus visual feedback condition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62,243–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samuel, J.M.F. (1981). Individual differences in the interaction of vision and proprioception. In Walk, R.D. & Pick, H.L. Jr. (Eds.), Intersensory perception and sensory integration (pp. 375–397). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tloczynski, J. (1993). Attention and visual dominance in motor learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 655–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von Hofsten, C, & Rosblad, B. (1988). The integration of sensory information in the development of precise manual pointing. Neuropsychologia, 6, 805–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar