Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-21T00:16:39.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Questions about educational effectiveness and developmental processes in prosocial education arising from a seven-year study of water conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2015

Raymond K. Watson
Raymond K. Watson*
Affiliation:
University of Ballarat
*
School of Behavioural and Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Ballarat, PO Box 663, Ballarat Victoria 3353, Ph: (03) 5327 9612, Fax: (03) 5334 1104, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The results of research into patterns of change and stability in water conservation are used to draw attention to some potentially important questions for prosocial teaching in schools. The patterns emerged from a main study measuring three rounds of responses from 2,600 urban, primary and secondary students and their parents and teachers in cross-sectional and longitudinal samples over seven years and from a similar, four-year, comparative study of 600 participants in a regional area. The results tracked water conservation knowledge, attitudes, intentions, and behaviour as well as sources of information and persuasion that participants considered to have been influential in bringing them to their current level of water conservation. Similar patterns of change and stability prevailed across all data sets in both studies. Changes in student behaviour were minimally related to knowledge. Changes were best explained in two ways: stable, age-related, developmental patterns and differences across time in general community influences rather than in school-specific effects on change. For prosocial education in general, these findings raise various questions about effective delivery and about the potential role of development. It is argued that these questions, by virtue of their significance in public policy decisions, need further investigation.

Keywords

Changing behaviourchildren’s attitudes and intentionsdevelopmental profilesprosocial educationpublic policyteachable moments
Type
Research Article
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , November 1999 , pp. 72 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenbach, T. (1991). Manual for Child Behavior Checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, Vermont: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Havighurst, R. (1972). Developmental tasks and education (3rd ed.). New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
Murphy, M., Watson, R., & Moore, S. (1991). Encouraging water saving: The role of knowledge, attitudes, and intention. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 7, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, S., Murphy, M., & Watson, R. (1994). A longitudinal study of domestic water conservation behavior. Population and Environment, 16, 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Our great unfillable does the unthinkable. (1992, October, 16). The Age, p.3.Google Scholar
Prokhorov, A., Perry, C., Kelder, S., & Klepp, K.-I. (1993). Lifestyle values of adolescents: Results from Minnesota Heart Health Youth Program. Adolescence, 28, 637–647.Google ScholarPubMed
Syme, G., Beven, C, &Sumner, N. (1993). Motivation for reported involvement in local wetland preservation: The roles of knowledge, disposition, problem assessment, and arousal. Environment and Behavior, 25(5), 586–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, R., Murphy, M., Kilfoyle, F., & Moore, S. (1999). An opportunistic field experiment in community water conservation. Population and Environment, 20, 545–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar