Hostname: page-component-69cd664f8f-wvgvr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-12T14:22:48.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Verification in Economics and History: A Sequel to Scientifization, O. F. Hamouda and B. B. Price. London: Routledge, 1991, x + 182 pages.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2009

Harold Kincaid
Harold Kincaid
Affiliation:
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , October 1993 , pp. 322 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Broadberry, S. 1992. Review of Hamouda and Price (1991), in Economic History Revieiv XLV (4):840–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floud, Roderick, Kenneth, Wachter, and Annabel, Gregory. 1990. Height, Health and History. Nutritional Status in the United Kingdom, 1750–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartwell, R. M. and Engerman, S.. 1974. “Models of Immiseration: The Theoretical Basis of Pessimism.” In The Standard of Living in Britain in the Industrial Revolution, edited by Taylor, Arthur J., pp. 189–213. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J. 1957. “The British Standard of Living, 1790–1850.” Reprinted in Taylor (1975, pp. 58–92).Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J.. 1974. “The Standard of Living Debate.” In Taylor (1975, pp. 179–88).Google Scholar
Taylor, Arthur J. 1975. The Standard of Living in Britain in the Industrial Revolution. London: Methuen.Google Scholar