Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:10:30.865Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Communitarian Utility Function and its Social and Economic Implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Basant K. Kapur
Basant K. Kapur
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The term ‘communitarianism’ is often identified with ‘altruism’: an individual is taken to be communitarian-minded if he or she is concerned with the well-being of others, and not only with his or her own well-being. While communitarianism may embrace altruism, it is most appositely viewed as having a broader connotation. Consider, for example, the puzzle of voting behaviour, discussed by Amitai Etzioni (1988) and many others (including, very recently, Aldrich (1997)). Casting one's vote entails a cost, albeit usually a small one: however, if there are large numbers voting, then one's own vote has a negligible effect on the outcome. An altruist might therefore rationally refrain from voting (just as an entirely self-interested individual would), since he incurs a cost, and neither he nor anybody else receives a benefit. And yet, millions of people the world over regularly vote in elections. Other examples could also be given.

‘Group-oriented’ behaviour has been the focus of a number of recent studies. C. Clague (1993), for example, examines the roles of guilt and shame in discouraging tax evasion, and informally discusses how social influences may affect the strength of these sentiments. R. Naylor and M. Cripps (1993) examine the influence of social custom on individuals' propensity to join trade unions, while P. Nelson (1994) argues that in choosing which party to vote for people assign some weight to the preferences of persons they associate with.

Type
Essays
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , April 1999 , pp. 43 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, John H. 1997. ‘When Is It Rational to Vote?’ In Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook, pp. 373–90. Mueller, Dennis C. (ed.). Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Barker, Ernest (Sir). 1959. The Political Thought of Plato and Aristotle. Dover Publications Inc.Google Scholar
Barol, B. 1988. ‘The eighties are over’. Newsweek, 01 4, pp. 40–8Google Scholar
Baumol, William J., with Turvey, Ralph. 1970. Economic Dynamics: An Introduction. MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Bernheim, B. Douglas and Stark, Oded. 1988. ‘Altruism within the family reconsidered: do nice guys finish last?’ American Economic Review, 78:1034–45Google Scholar
Boswell, T. 1989. ‘Curse of modern sports: me-itis’. Washington Post, 12 6, Section c1Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M. 1978. ‘Markets, states, and the extent of morals’. American Economic Review, 68:364–8Google Scholar
Clague, Christopher. 1993. ‘Rule obedience, organizational loyalty, and economic development’. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 149:393–414Google Scholar
Collard, David A. 1981. Altruism and Economy: A Study in Non-Selfish Economics. Martin RobertsonGoogle Scholar
Collier, James L. 1991. The Rise of Selfishness in America. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Conway, Mary Margaret. 1985. Political Participation in the United States. Congressional Quarterly PressGoogle Scholar
Davies, Philip J. 1992. Elections USA. Manchester University PressGoogle Scholar
Dennis, J. 1970. ‘Support for the institution of elections by the public’. American Political Science Review, 64:819–35Google Scholar
Donohue, William A. 1990. The New Freedom: Individualism and Collectivism in the Social Lives of Americans. Transaction PublishersGoogle Scholar
Dore, Ronald P. 1987. Taking Japan Seriously: A Confucian Perspective on Leading Economic Issues. The Athlone PressGoogle Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai. 1988. The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics. Free PressGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno S. 1997. ‘A constitution for knaves crowds out civic virtues’. Economic Journal, 107:1043–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holländer, Heinz. 1990. ‘A social exchange approach to voluntary cooperation’. American Economic Review, 80:1157–67Google Scholar
Kandel, Eugene and Lazear, Edward P.. 1992. ‘Peer pressure and partnerships’. Journal of Political Economy, 100:801–17Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1930. Lectures on Ethics. MacmurrayGoogle Scholar
Knack, Stephen. 1992. ‘Civic norms, social sanctions, and voter turnout’. Rationality and Society, 4:133–56Google Scholar
Lasch, Christopher. 1978. The Culture of Narcissism. NortonGoogle Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 1980. ‘A calculus of group membership’. American Journal of Political Science, 24:593–632Google Scholar
Naylor, Robin and Cripps, Martin. 1993. ‘An economic theory of the open shop trade union’. European Economic Review, 37:1599–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Philip. 1994. ‘Voting and imitative behaviour’. Economic Inquiry, XXXII:92–102Google Scholar
Newsweek. 1994. Feature Article on ‘In search of the sacred’. 11 28Google Scholar
Offerman, Theo, Sonnemans, Joep and Schram, Arthur. 1996. ‘Value orientations, expectations and voluntary contributions in public goods’. Economic Journal, 106:817–45Google Scholar
Okimoto, Daniel I. 1988. ‘Japan, the Societal State’. In Inside the Japanese System: Readings on Contemporary Society and Political Economy, pp. 211–5. Okimoto, Daniel I. and Rohlen, Thomas P. (eds.). Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Okimoto, Daniel I. 1989. Between MITI and the Market: Japanese Industrial Policy for High Technology. Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Palfrey, Thomas R. and Prisbrey, Jeffrey E.. 1997. ‘Anomalous behavior in public goods experiments: how much and why?’ American Economic Review, 87:829–46Google Scholar
Schram, Arthur and , Joep, Sonnemans. 1996. ‘Why people vote: experimental evidence’. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17:417–42.Google Scholar
Stark, Oded. 1989. ‘Altruism and the quality of life’. American Economic Review, 79:86–90Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1992. ‘Atomism’. In Communitarianism and Individualism, pp. 29–50. Avineri, Shlomo and de-Shalit, Avner (eds.). Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Uslaner, E. 1991. ‘The decline of comity in Congress’. ManuscriptGoogle Scholar
Woshinsky, Oliver H. 1995. Culture and Politics. Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
Young, Douglas J. 1989. ‘A “fair share” model of public good provision’. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 11:137–47Google Scholar