Hostname: page-component-669899f699-8p65j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T03:46:31.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Re St Peter and St Paul, Pettistree

St Edmundsbury and Ipswich Consistory Court: Gau Ch, 12 December 2023[2023] ECC SEI 1Implementation – restoration order – removal of wall paint

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2024

David Willink
David Willink*
Affiliation:
Barrister, Lamb Chambers, London, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Pursuant to a 2013 faculty, the interior of this mediaeval church was painted in 2014. Instead of the specified limewash paint, the architect selected an alternative paint, which proved to be inappropriate: it was impermeable, damaging the wall fabric and causing the paint to flake off. Following a consistory court hearing in 2017 (reported at [2017] ECC SEI 6), the PCC was ordered to remove the paint, and repaint using the originally specified limewash, the cost to be borne by the architect.

Type
Case Note
Information
Ecclesiastical Law Journal , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , September 2024 , pp. 345 - 346
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable