Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T22:36:58.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jaw musculature and jaw mechanics of Sebecus icaeorhinus Simpson, 1937 (Mesoeucrocodylia, Sebecosuchia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2013

Ralph E. Molnar
Ralph E. Molnar*
Affiliation:
Museum of Northern Arizona, 3101 North Fort Valley Road, Flagstaff, AZ 86001-8348, USA University of California Museum of Paleontology, 1100 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, CA 94720-4780, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sebecus icaeorhinus possessed a narrow, elevated snout and laterally compressed, serrate teeth, unlike modern crocodilians, but superficially similar to those of theropod dinosaurs. Lever arms of the mandibular adductors were generally relatively greater than those of Crocodylus niloticus. Some of the adductors and the depressor mandibulae were relatively larger than in Alligator mississippiensis. Thus Sebecus may have had a stronger bite than the modern forms examined. The form of the teeth suggests use in cutting. Some theropod dinosaurs are similar to sebecosuchians in the possession of relatively deep, narrow snouts and laterally-compressed, serrate teeth. However, the adductor structure was substantially different from that of Sebecus. The presence of muscle and tendon attachments in Sebecus suggests the adductor structure of mesoeucrocodylians is conservative and was established before divergence of the sebecosuchian and neosuchian lineages. No results presented here contradict the interpretation of sebecosuchians as land-dwelling predators.

Keywords

ArgentinaCasamayoranSarmiento Formationziphodont
Type
Articles
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 103 , Issue 3-4: The Full Profession: A Celebration of the Life and Career of Wann Langston, Jr., Quintessential Vertebrate Palaeontologist , September 2012 , pp. 501 - 519
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

11. References

Abler, W. L. 1992. The serrated teeth of tyrannosaurid dinosaurs, and biting structures in other animals. Paleobiology 18 (2), 161–83.Google Scholar
Anderson, H. 1936. The jaw musculature of the phytosaur, Machaeroprosopus. Journal of Morphology 59 (3), 549–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barghusen, H. R. 1973. The adductor jaw musculature of Dimetrodon (Reptilia, Pelycosauria). Journal of Paleontology 47 (1), 823–34.Google Scholar
Berthold, A. A. 1846. Mittheilungen über das zoologische Museum zu Göttingen. I. Verzeichniss der aufgestellten Reptilien. Göttingen: Dieterichschen Buchhandlung. 28 pp.Google Scholar
Bona, P. & Desojo, J. B. 2011. Osteology and cranial musculature of Caiman latirostris (Crocodylia: Alligatoridae). Journal of Morphology 272 (7), 780–95Google Scholar
Bronzati, M., Montefeltro, F. C. & Langer, M. C. 2012. A species-level supertree of Crocodyliformes. Historical Biology 24(6), 598–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buffetaut, E. 1975. Sur l'articulation entre le quadratojugal et le surangulaire de certains Crocodiliens fossiles. Comptes Rendus de la Academie des Sciences de Paris D 280, 2741–43.Google Scholar
Busbey, A. B. III. 1989. Form and function of the feeding apparatus of Alligator mississippiensis. Journal of Morphology 202 (1), 99–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Busbey, A. B. III. 1995. The structural consequences of skull flattening in crocodilians. In Thomason, J. J., (ed.) Functional Morphology in Vertebrate Paleontology, 173–92. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cleuren, J. & De Vree, F. 2000. Feeding in crocodilians. In Schwenk, K. (ed.) Feeding: form, function, and evolution in tetrapod vertebrates. 337–58. San Diego, California: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Colbert, E. H. 1946. Sebecus, representative of a peculiar suborder of fossil Crocodilia from Patagonia. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 87, 217–70.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. J. L. C. F. D. 1825. Recherches sur les ossemens fossiles de quadrupèdes, où l'on rétablit les caractères du plusieurs espèces d'animaux que les révolutions du globe paroissent avoir détruites, vol. 5 (2nd edn). Paris: Dufour & d'Ocagne. 547 pp.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. J. L. F. D. 1829. Le Regne Animal Distribué, d'apres son Organisation, pur servir de base à l'Histoire naturelle des Animaux et d'introduction à l'Anatomie Comparé Vol. 2 (2nd edn). Les Reptiles. Paris: Déterville. 406 pp.Google Scholar
D'Amore, D. C. 2009. A functional explanation for denticulation in theropod dinosaur teeth. The Anatomical Record 292 (9), 1297–314.Google Scholar
Daudin, F. M. 1802. Histoire Naturelle, Générale et Particulière des Reptiles. Paris: F. Dufart. 432 pp.Google Scholar
Dereniyagala, P. E. P. 1939. The Tetrapod Reptiles of Ceylon, vol. 1, Testudinates and Crocodilians. Colombo, Ceylon: Colombo Museum. 412 pp.Google Scholar
Dilkes, D. W., Hutchinson, J. R., Holliday, C. M. & Witmer, L. M. 2012. Reconstructing the musculature of dinosaurs. In Brett-Surman, M. K., Holtz, T. R. Jr. & Farlow, J. O. (eds) The Complete Dinosaur, ed. 2, 151–90. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Duméril, A. M. C. & Duméril, A. H. A. 1851. Catalogue méthodique de la collection des reptiles du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris. Paris: Gide et Baudry/Roret. 224 pp.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. L. & Tanner, W. W. 1970. Osteological and mylogical [sic.] comparisons of the head and thorax regions of Cnemidophorus tigris septentrionalis Burger and Ameiva undulata parva Barbour & Noble (family Teiidae). Brigham Young University Science Bulletin 11, 1–41.Google Scholar
Fowles, G. R. 1962. Analytical Mechanics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 278 pp.Google Scholar
Gadow, H. 1901. Amphibia and reptiles. In Harmer, S. F. & Shipley, A. E. (eds) The Cambridge Natural History, vol. 8, Amphibia and Reptiles. 436–37. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Gans, C. & Bock, W. J. 1963. On the functional significance of pinnate muscles. Proceedings of the International Congress of Zoology 16, 168.Google Scholar
Gans, C. & Bock, W. J. 1965. The functional significance of muscle architecture – a theoretical analysis. Ergebnisse der Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte 39, 115–42.Google Scholar
Gasparini, Z. B. 1972. Los Sebecosuchia (Crocodilia) del territorio Argentino consideraciones sobre su “status” taxonomico. Ameghiniana 9, 23–34.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1865. Revision of the genera and species of Chamaeleonidae, with the description of some new species. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1864, 465–79.Google Scholar
Henderson, D. M. & Weishampel, D. B. 2002. Convergent evolution of the maxilla-dental-complex among carnivorous archosaurs. Senckenbergiana lethaea 82, 77–92.Google Scholar
Hendricks, A., Subramony, L. & van Blerk, C. 1999. Physics for Engineering. Kenwyn, Cape Town, South Africa: Juta & Co., Ltd. 429 pp.Google Scholar
Holliday, C. M. 2009. New insights into dinosaur jaw muscle anatomy. The Anatomical Record 292 (9), 1246–65.Google Scholar
Holliday, C. M. & Gardner, N. M. 2012. A new eusuchian crocodyliform with novel cranial integument and its significance for the origin and evolution of Crocodylia. Public Library of Science One 7 (1): 1–13, e30471.Google Scholar
Holliday, C. M. & Witmer, L. M. 2007. Archosaur adductor chamber evolution: integration of musculoskeletal and topological criteria in jaw muscle homology. Journal of Morphology 268 (6), 457–84.Google Scholar
Holliday, C. M. & Witmer, L. M. 2008. Cranial kinesis in dinosaurs: intracranial joints, protractor muscles, and their significance for cranial evolution and function in diapsids. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 28 (4), 1073–88.Google Scholar
Holliday, C. M. & Witmer, L. M. 2009. The epipterygoid of crocodyliforms and its significance for the evolution of the orbitotemporal region of eusuchians. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 29 (3), 715–33.Google Scholar
Howard, H. 1955. A new wading bird from the Eocene of Patagonia. American Museum Novitates 1710, 1–25.Google Scholar
Iordansky, N. N. 1964, The jaw muscles of the crocodiles and some relating structures of the crocodilian skull. Anatomischer Anzeiger 115, 256–80.Google Scholar
Iordansky, N. N. 2000. Jaw muscles of the crocodiles: structure, synonymy, and some implications on homology and functions. Russian Journal of Herpetology 7 (1), 41–50.Google Scholar
Iori, F. V. & Carvalho, I. S. 2011. Caipirasuchus paulistanus, a new sphagisaurid (Crocodylomorpha, Mesoeucrocodylia) from the Adamantina Formation (Upper Cretaceous, Turonian–Santonian), Bauru Basin, Brazil. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 31 (6), 1255–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, T. R. & Levinson, D. A. 2005. Dynamics, Theory and Applications. Ithaca: Internet-First University Press. 379 pp.Google Scholar
Lakjer, T. 1926. Studien über die Trigeminus-versorgte Kaumuskulatur der Sauropsiden. Copenhagen: C. A. Reitzel. 115 pp.Google Scholar
Langston, W. 1956. The Sebecosuchia: cosmopolitan crocodiles? American Journal of Science 254, 605–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langston, W. 1965. Fossil crocodiles from Colombia and the Cenozoic history of the Crocodilia in South America. University of California Publications in Geological Science 52, 1–157.Google Scholar
Larsson, H. C. E. & Sues, H.-D. 2007. Cranial osteology and phylogenetic relationships of Hamadasuchus rebouli (Crocodyliformes: Mesoeucrocodylia) from the Cretaceous of Morocco. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 149 (4), 533–67.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturæ per regna tria naturæ, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis Tomus I (10th edn). Stockholm: Laurentii Salvii. 824 pp.Google Scholar
Madden, R. H., Carlini, A. A., Vucetich, M. G. & Kay, R. F. (eds). 2010. The Paleontology of the Gran Barranca. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 458 pp.Google Scholar
McGowan, C. 1986. The wing musculature of the Weka (Gallirallus australis), a flightless rail endemic to New Zealand. Journal of Zoology A 210 (3), 305–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHenry, C. R., Clausen, P. D., Daniel, W. J. T., Meers, M. B. & Pendharkar, A. 2006. Biomechanics of the rostrum in crocodilians: a comparative analysis using finite-element modeling. The Anatomical Record A 288A, 827–49.Google Scholar
McIhenny, E. A. 1935. The Alligator's Life History. Boston, Massachusetts: Christopher Publishing House. 117 pp.Google Scholar
Mocquard, F. 1894. Diagnoses de quelques reptiles nouveaux de Madagascar. Comptes Rendus de la Société Philomathique de Paris 9, 3–5.Google Scholar
Molnar, R. E. 1991. The cranial morphology of Tyrannosaurus rex. Palaeontographica A 217, 137–76.Google Scholar
Molnar, R. E. 2008. Reconstruction of the jaw musculature of Tyrannosaurus rex. In Larson, P. & Carpenter, K. (eds) Tyrannosaurus rex, the Tyrant King. 254–81. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Molnar, R. E. 2010. A new reconstruction of the skull of Sebecus icaeorhinus (Crocodyliformes: Sebecosuchia) from the Eocene of Argentina. Brazilian Geographical Journal: Geosciences and Humanities Research Medium 1 (2), 314–30.Google Scholar
Molnar, R. E. 2013. A comparative analysis of reconstructed jaw musculature and mechanics of some large theropods. In Parrish, J. M., Molnar, R. E., Currie, P. J. & Koppelhus, E. B. (eds) Tyrannosaurid Paleobiology, 176–93. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 312 pp.Google Scholar
Oelrich, T. M. 1956. The anatomy of the head of Ctenosaura pectinata (Iguanidae). Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 94, 1–122.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. F. 1905. Tyrannosaurus and other Cretaceous carnivorous dinosaurs. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 21, 259–65.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. F. 1912. Crania of Tyrannosaurus and Allosaurus. Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural History 1, 1–30.Google Scholar
Ösi, A. & Weishampel, D. B. 2009. Jaw mechanism and dental function in the Late Cretaceous basal eusuchian Iharkutosuchus. Journal of Morphology 270 (8), 903–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostrom, J. H. 1961. Cranial morphology of the hadrosaurian dinosaurs of North America. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 122, 35–186.Google Scholar
Paolillo, A. & Linares, O. J. 2007. Nuevos cocodrilos Sebecosuchia del Cenozoico Suramericano (Mesosuchia: Crocodylia). Paleobiologia Neotropical 3, 1–25.Google Scholar
Poglayen-Neuwall, I. 1953. Untersuchungen der Kiefermuskatur und deren Innervation an Krokodilen. Anatomischer Anzeiger 99, 257–76.Google Scholar
Pol, D., Leardi, J. M., Lecuona, A. & Krause, M. 2012. Postcranial anatomy of Sebecus icaeorhinus (Crocodyliformes, Sebecidae) from the Eocene of Patagonia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 32 (2), 328–54.Google Scholar
Pol, D. & Powell, J. E. 2011. A new sebecid mesoeucrocodylian from the Rio Loro Formation (Palaeocene) of north-western Argentina. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 163 (S1), S7–S36.Google Scholar
Porro, L. B., Holliday, C. M., Anapol, F., Ontiveros, L. C., Ontiveros, L. T. & Ross, C. F. 2011. Free body analysis, beam mechanics, and finite element modeling of the mandible of Alligator mississippiensis. Journal of Morphology 272 (8), 910–37.Google Scholar
Rayfield, E. J. & Milner, A. C. 2008. Establishing a framework for archosaur cranial mechanics. Paleobiology 34 (4), 494–515.Google Scholar
Rayfield, E. J., Milner, A. C., Xuan, V. B. & Young, P. G. 2007. Functional morphology of spinosaur ‘crocodile-mimic’ dinosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 27 (4), 892–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayfield, E. J., Norman, D. B. & Upchurch, P. 2002. Reply to Frazetta, T. H. & Kardong, K. V. [Prey attack by a large theropod dinosaur. Nature 416, 387–88]. Nature 416, 388.Google Scholar
Riff, D. & Kellner, A. W. A. 2011. Baurusuchid crocodyliforms as theropod mimics: clues from the skull and appendicular morphology of Stratiotosuchus maxhechti (Upper Cretaceous of Brazil). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 163 (S1), S37–S56.Google Scholar
Schneider, J. G. 1801. Historiae Amphibiorum naturalis et literariae. Fasciculus secundus continens Crocodilos, Scincos, Chamaesauras, Boas, Pseudoboas, Elapes, Angues, Amphisbaenas et Caecilias. Jena: Frommani. 374 pp.Google Scholar
Schumacher, G.-H. 1973. The head muscles and hyolaryngeal skeleton of turtles and crocodilians. In Gans, C. & Parsons, T. S. (eds) Biology of the Reptilia, vol. 4, Morphology D. 101–99. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, M. H. 2011. Soft tissue preservation in terrestrial Mesozoic vertebrates. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 39, 187–216.Google Scholar
Shaw, G. 1802. General Zoology, or Systematic Natural History, 3 (2), 313–615. London: G. Kearsley, Thomas Davison.Google Scholar
Shimada, K., Sato, I. & Ezure, H. 1993. Morphological analysis of tendinous structure in the American Alligator jaw muscles. Journal of Morphology 217 (2), 171–81.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1937. New reptiles from the Eocene of South America. American Museum Novitates 927, 1–3.Google Scholar
Snively, E. & Russell, A. P. 2007. Functional morphology of neck musculature in the Tyrannosauridae (Dinosauria, Theropoda) as determined via a hierarchical inferential approach. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 151 (4), 759–808.Google Scholar
Tsai, H. P. & Holliday, C. M. 2011. Ontogeny of the Alligator cartilago transiliens and its significance for sauropsid jaw muscle evolution. PloS One 6 (9), e24935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024935.Google Scholar
Turner, A. H. & Calvo, J. O. 2005. A new sebecosuchian crocodyliform from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 25 (1), 87–98.Google Scholar
Van Drongelen, W., & Dullemeijer, P. 1982. The feeding apparatus of Caiman crocodilus; a functional-morphological study. Anatomischer Anzieger 151, 337–66.Google Scholar
Walker, A. D. 1968. Protosuchus, Proterochampsa, and the origin of phytosaurs and crocodiles. Geological Magazine 105, 1–14.Google Scholar
Westaway, M. C., Thompson, J. C., Wood, W. B. & Njau, J. 2011. Crocodile ecology and the taphonomy of early Australasian sites. Environmental Archaeology 16 (2), 124–36.Google Scholar
Wiegmann, A. F. A. 1834. Herpetologia Mexicana, seu descriptio amphibiorum novae hispaniae, quae itineribus comitis de Sack, Ferdinandi Deppe et Chr. Guil. Schiede im Museum Zoologicum Berolinense Pervenerunt. Pars prima, saurorum species. Berlin: Lüderitz. 54 pp.Google Scholar
Wroe, S., McHenry, C. & Thomason, J. 2005. Bite club: comparative bite force in big biting mammals and the prediction of predatory behaviour in fossil taxa. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London B 272 (1563), 619–25.Google Scholar