Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:22:12.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XIV.—The Igneous and Metamorphic History of Cromar, Deeside, Aberdeenshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

H. H. Read
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Middle and Lower Deeside lie within the belt of injection and high-temperature metamorphism made famous by the pioneer researches of Mr George Barrow. In this paper are recorded the results obtained from a study of Cromar, an area small enough to admit of detailed petrographical treatment and yet large enough to exhibit a considerable variety of igneous and metamorphic phenomena. Of the three great phases of igneous activity there displayed, one is older than the epoch of maximum crustal movements, the second is closely connected with these, and the third is later; the rocks of each period have their own quite definite chemical, petrographical, and geological characteristics. Whilst here most attention will be directed towards the second group, that associated with the movements, an account of the other two groups will be given adequate for a discussion of the full igneous history of the area.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , 1927 , pp. 317 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Asklund, B., “Om en kisförekomst bunden till grönsten från Krokeks socken i Östergötland,” Geol. Fören. Stockh. Förh, xliii, 1921, p. 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2) Bailey, E. B., “The Metamorphism of the South-west Highlands,” Geol. Mag., lx, 1923, p. 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3) Barrow, G., “On certain Gneisses with Round-grained Oligoclase and their Relation to Pegmatites,” Geol. Mag., 1892, p. 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4) Barrow, G., “On an Intrusion of Muscovite-biotite Gneiss in the South-eastern Highlands of Scotland, etc.,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., xlix, 1893, p. 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5) Barrow, G., in Annual Report of the Geological Survey for 1895 (1896).Google Scholar
(6) Barrow, G., in “Summary of Progress for 1897,” Mem. Geol. Survey, 1898.Google Scholar
(7) Barrow, G., in “The Geology of Blair Atholl, etc.” (Explanation of Sheet 55), Mem. Geol. Survey, Scot., 1905.Google Scholar
(8) Barrow, G., in “The Geology of Braemar, etc.” (Explanation of Sheet 65), Mem. Geol. Survey, Scot., 1912.Google Scholar
(9) Barrow, G., “On the Geology of Lower Deeside, etc.” Proc. Geol. Assoc., xxiii, 1912.Google Scholar
(10) Becke, F., “Zur Physiographie der Gemengteile der Krystallinen Schiefer,” Denkschr. Akad. Wissensch. Wien, lxxv, 1913, p. 97.Google Scholar
(11) Broch, O. A., “Ein suprakrustaler Gneiskomplex auf der Halbinsel Nesodden bei Oslö,” Norsk. Geol. Tidsskr., ix, 2, 1926.Google Scholar
(12) Clough, C. T., in “The Geology of Cowal,” Mem. Geol. Survey, Scot., 1897.Google Scholar
(13) Cole, G. A. J., “On Composite Gneisses in Boylagh, West Donegal,” Proc. Roy. Irish Acad., xxiv, 1902, p. 203.Google Scholar
(14) Cole, G. A. J., “A Composite Gneiss near Barna (County Galway),” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxi, 1915, p. 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15) Craig, E. H. C., “Metamorphism in the Loch-Lomond District,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lx, 1904, p. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16) Erdmannsdorfer, O. H., “Über Einschlusse und Resorptionsvorgänge in Eruptivgesteinen,” Fortsch. Min. Kryst. Pet., v, 1916, p. 173.Google Scholar
(17) Eskola, P., “On the Petrology of the Orijärvi Region in South-western Finland,” Bull. Comm. Géol. Finlande, No. 40, 1914.Google Scholar
(18) Fehr, W., “Injektions- und Intrusionserscheinungen im zentralen Teil der südlichen Gneise des Aarmassivs,” Schweiz. Min. Pet. Mitt., ii, 1923, p. 331.Google Scholar
(19) Fenner, C. N., “The Mode of Formation of Certain Gneisses in the Highlands of New Jersey,” Journ. Geol., xxii, 1914, p. 594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(20) Flett, J. S., in “The Geology of the Seaboard of Mid Argyll “(Explanation of Sheet 36), Mem. Geol. Survey, Scot., 1909.Google Scholar
(21) Flett, J. S., in “The Geology of Knapdale, Jura, and North Kintyre “(Explanation of Sheet 28), Mem. Geol. Survey, Scot., 1911.Google Scholar
(22) Gäbert, C., “Die Gneise des Erzgebirges und ihre Kontaktwirkungen,” Zeitsch. Deutsch. Geol. Gesell, lix, 1907, p. 308.Google Scholar
(23) Gavelin, A., “Till Frågen om de Kristallina seveskifrernas ursprung och metamorfos,” Geol. Fören. Stockh. Förh, xli, 1919, p. 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(24) Goldschmidt, V. M., “Die Injektionsmetamorphose im Stavanger-gebiet,” Vidensk.-Selsk. Skrift. Kristiania, No. 10, 1920.Google Scholar
(25) Goldschmidt, V. M., “Die Kalksilikatgneise und Kalksilikatglimmerschiefer des Trondhjem-gebiets,” Vidensk.-Selsk. Skrift. Kristiania, No. 10, 1915.Google Scholar
(26) Goldschmidt, V. M., “Übersicht der Eruptivgesteine im Kaledonischen Gebirge zwischen Stavanger und Trondhjem,” Vidensk.-Selsk. Skrift. Kristiania, No. 2, 1916.Google Scholar
(27) Grubenmann, U., and Niggli, P., Die Gesteinsmetamorphose, 1924.Google Scholar
(28) Harker, A., “Some Aspects of Igneous Action in Britain,” Pres. Address, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxiii, 1918, p. lxvii.Google Scholar
(29) Hinxman, L. W., in “Central Aberdeenshire” (Explanation of Sheet 76), Mem. Geol. Survey, Scot., 1890.Google Scholar
(30) Högbom, A. G., “The Igneous Rocks of Ragunda, Alnö, Rödö, and Nordingrä,” Geol. Fören. Stockh. Förh., xxxi, 1909, p. 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(31) Holmquist, P. J., “Studien über die Granite von Schweden,” Bull. Geol. Inst. Univ. Upsala, vii, 1904–1905, p. 77.Google Scholar
(32) Klemm, G., “Ueber einige typische Fälle von granitischen Injektionen in Schiefergesteinen,” Notizbl. Ver. Erdk. Darmstadt., iv, 25, 1904, p. 10.Google Scholar
(33) Lacroix, A., “Le Granite des Pyrénées et ses Phénomènes de Contact, I,” Bull. Serv. Carte Géol. France, No. 64, x, 1898–1899; and II, ibid., xi, 1900.Google Scholar
(34) Leclère, A., “Etude Chimique du Granite de Flamanville,” Bull. Serv. Carte Géol. France, No. 113, xvii, 1905–1907.Google Scholar
(35) Linck, G., “Über den Chemismus der tonigen Sedimente,” Geol. Rund., iv, 1913, p. 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(36) Memoirs Geol. Survey, Scot. Sheet: 85 (1902), pp. 29–30, 44–6; 55 (1905), pp. 73–87; 37 (1905), pp. 62–71; 45 (1908), pp. 41–5; 36 (1909), pp. 43–56; 65 (1912), pp. 57–66; 64 (1913), pp. 48–51; 54 (1923), pp. 59–61; 86 and 96 (1923), pp. 79–101.Google Scholar
(37) Niggli, P., Die Leichtflüchtigen Bestandteile im Magma, 1920.Google Scholar
(38) Philipp, H., “Vorläufige Mitteilungen über Resorption- und Injektions-erscheinungen im südlichen Schwarzwald,” Neues Jahrb., C–Bl, 1907, p. 76.Google Scholar
(39) Philipp, H., “Studien aus dem Gebiete der Granite und umgewandelten Gabbro des mittleren Wiesentales,” Mitt. Bad. Geol. Landesanst., vi, 1910, p. 327.Google Scholar
(40) Quensel, P., “De kristalline Sevebergarternas geologiska och petrografiska ställning inom Kebnakaiseområdet,” Geol. Fören. Stockh. Förh., xli, 1919, p. 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(41) Read, H. H., in “The Geology of Banff, Huntly, and Turriff” (Explanation of Sheets 86 and 96), Mem. Geol. Survey, Scot., 1923.Google Scholar
(42) Read, H. H., “The Petrology of the Arnage District (Aberdeenshire),” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxix, 1923, p. 446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(43) Read, H. H., in “The Geology of Strath Oykell” (Explanation of Sheet 102), Mem. Geol. Survey, Scot., 1926.Google Scholar
(44) Read, H. H., in “The Geology of the Country around Golspie, Sutherlandshire” (Explanation of Sheet 103), Mem. Geol. Survey, Scot., 1925.Google Scholar
(45) Read, H. H., in “The Geology of Corrour and the Moor of Rannoch” (Explanation of Sheet 54), Mem. Geol. Survey, Scot., 1923.Google Scholar
(46) Reinhold, F., “Pegmatit- und Aplit-Adern aus dem Liegendschiefern des Gföhler Zentralgneises im niederösterreichischen Waldviertel,” Tscherm. Min. Pet. Mitt., xxix, 1910, p. 43.Google Scholar
(47) Schwenkel, H., “Die Eruptivgneise des Schwarzwaldes und ihr Verhältnis zum Granit,” Tscherm. Min. Pet. Mitt., xxxi, 1912, p. 139.Google Scholar
(48) Sederholm, J. J., “On Migmatites and Associated Pre-Cambrian Rocks of Southwestern Finland, Part 1, the Pellinge Region,” Bull. Comm. Géol. Finlande, No. 58, 1923.Google Scholar
(49) Sederholm, J. J., “On Synantectic Minerals,” Bull. Comm. Géol. Finlande, No. 48, 1916.Google Scholar
(50) Tilley, C. E., “The Granite-Gneisses of Southern Eyre Peninsula (South Australia) and their Associated Amphibolites,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxvii, 1921, p. 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(51) Washington, H. S., “Chemical Analyses of Igneous Rocks,” Unit. States Geol. Survey, Prof. Paper, No. 99, 1917.Google Scholar