Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T19:28:15.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

V.—The Marine Mollusca of the Scottish National Antarctic Expedition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

James Cosmo Melvill  and
Robert Standen
Robert Standen
Affiliation:
Assistant Keeper, Manchester Museum
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The marine Mollusca obtained during the Scottish National Antarctic Expedition of s.s. Scotia are particularly interesting, not merely on account of certain benthal forms having been for the first time brought to light from unusual depths, but also as demonstrating an extended geographical range for certain meridional species already known; while the occurrence of sundry British and North European individuals in the Falkland Islands—perhaps brought there adventitiously—is, to some extent, a new feature in the fauna. Regarding the deep-sea species just alluded to, the dredging of a second example of the hitherto unique Guivillea alabastrina, Watson, from a station not far from the original Challenger locality, is very noteworthy; while we may at the same time signalise a Columbarium, Cuspidaria, Chrysodomus, and Dentalium, from 1775, 2645, 1775, and 1410 fathoms respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , 1908 , pp. 119 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1908

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1877. Smith, Edgar A., “Mollusca,” in Zoology of the Transit of Venus Expedition, London, 1877, 4to, 26 pp., pl. ix. [Kerguelen Island. Thirty-five species of marine Mollusca enumerated, and many described.]Google Scholar
1879. Smith, Edgar A., Kerguelen Island: the known Mollusca, 13 marine Bivalves, 26 Gastropoda, and 1 Cephalopod enumerated, and their typographical and bathymetrical distribution pointed out: Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., clxviii., pp. 157–192.Google Scholar
1879. Studer, T., Arch. f. Nat., xlv., pp. 127–129.Google Scholar
1885. Smith, Edgar A., “Report on the Lamellibranchiata collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76,” in Reports on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger: Zoology, xiii., pt. xxxv., pp. 341, pl. xxv.Google Scholar
1885. Smith, Edgar A., “Notes on the Lamellibranchiata,” in Challenger Narrative, i., pp. 624–626, figs. 210–213.Google Scholar
1886. Watson, R. Boog, “Report on the Scaphopoda and Gastropoda collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76,” Zoology, xv., pt. xlii., pp. 756, pls. 1. [From the Messier Channel, 6 species reported; Straits of Magellan, 2; Falkland Isles, 13; Prince Edward Isles, 24; Kerguelen Island, 65; Heard Island, 16.]Google Scholar
1886. Haddon, Alfred Cort, “Report on the Polyplacophora collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76,” Zoology, xv., pt. xliii., pp. 50, pls. iii. [Lepidopleurus dalli, sp. n., Messier Channel; L. dorsuosus, sp. n., Prince Edward Isles; Leptochiton kerguelensis, sp. n., Kerguelen Island.]Google Scholar
1887. Von Martens, E., and Pfeffer, G., “Die Mollusken von Süd-Georgien nach der Ausbeute der deutschen Station, 1882–83,” Jahrbuch der hamburgischen wissensch. Anstalt, iii., pp. 63–135, 4 plates. [Many new species described by Dr Pfeffer.]Google Scholar
1887. Pfeffer, G., “Photinula ringei, nov. sp., von der Lemaire-Strasse,” Verh. Ver. Hamburg, vi., pp. 98, 99.Google Scholar
1888. Smith, Edgar A., “Diagnoses of New Species of Pleurotomidæ in the British Museum,” Ann. and Mag. N. Hist. (6), ii., pp. 300–317. [Description of Pl. (Surcula) fuegiensis from the Straits of Magellan.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1889. Rochebrune, A. T. De, “Polyplacophora,” Mission scientifique du Cap Horn, 1882–1883: vi. Zoologie, pp. 131–143, pl. ix. [Twenty new Chitonidæ described.]Google Scholar
1889. Rochebrune, A. T. De, and Mabile, J., “Cephalopoda, Gastropoda, Lamellibranchiata,” Mission scientifique du Cap Horn, t. c., pp. 1–129, pls. i.–viii. [Eighty species described, and several new genera.]Google Scholar
1891. Smith, Edgar A., “Descriptions of New Species of Shells from the Challenger Expedition,” P.Z.S. Land., 1891, pp. 436–445, 2 plates. [Capulus compressus, sp. n., South Patagonia; Turritella incolor, sp. n., Kerguelen Island.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1893. Hidalgo, J. G., Obras Malacológicas, pt. iii.: “Descripsión de los Molluscos recogidos por la Comisión cientifica eviada por el Gobierno Español á la América Meridional,” Mem. Ac. Madrid, xvi., pp. 33–432. [Catalogues given of the Mollusca of the southern portion of South America.]Google Scholar
1895. Dautzenberg, Ph., “Liste de Mollusques du Chili,” Act. Soc. Chili, vi., pp. 64–67.Google Scholar
1897. Chun, C., Die Beziehungen zwischen dem arktischen und antarktischen Plankton, Stuttgart, 8vo, 64 pp., 1 map. [References to certain Antarctic pelagic Mollusca.]Google Scholar
1898. Melvill, J. C., and Standen, R., “Notes on a Collection of Marine Shells from Lively Island, Falklands, with List of Species,” J. Conch., ix., pp. 97–105, pl. i. (inparte). [Lachesis euthrioides, Cyamium falklandicum, Thracia antarctica, spp. n.]Google Scholar
1899. Thompson, D'Arcy W., “On a Supposed Resemblance between the Marine Faunas of the Arctic and Antarctic Regions,” P. R. Soc. Edin., xxii., pp. 311–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1899. Lönnberg, E., “On the Cephalopods collected by the Swedish Expedition to Tierra del Fuego, 1895–96,” Scenska Exped. Magellansländern, ii., pp. 49–64, pls. iv., v. [Gonatus antarcticus, Octopus patagonicus, spp. n.]Google Scholar
1899. Stempell, W., “Die Muscheln der Sammlung Plate,” Zool. Jahrb. Suppl., iv., pp. 217–250, pl. xii. [Avicula (Meleagrina) magellanica, Teredo (Xylotrya) martensi, spp. n.]Google Scholar
1899. Plate, L., “Die Anatomie und Phylogenie des Chitonen,” Zool. Jahrb. Suppl., iv. (Fauna Chilensis), pp. 15–216. [Lepidopleurus medinæ, Str. of Magellan, sp. n.]Google Scholar
1900. Pilsbry, Henry A., “Species of Chlorostoma of Southern and Eastern Patagonia,” Nautilus, xiii., pp. 110–112. [Chlorostoma hidalgoi, C. orbignyanum, spp. n.]Google Scholar
1901. Pelseneer, P., “Les Néoméniens de l'Expédition Antarctique beige, et la distribution géographique des Aplacophora,” Bull. Ac. Belgique, 1901, pp. 279–92, et Congr. Zool., 1901, pp. 775 sqq.Google Scholar
1901. Dall, W. Healey, “Synopsis of the Lucinacea and of the American Species,” P.U.S. Mus., xxiii., pp. 779–833, pls. xxxix.–xlii. [Thyasira magellanica, sp. n.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1901. Preston, Hugh B., “Description of Cymbiola mangeri, a supposed New Species from the Falkland Islands,” P. Malac. Soc. Land., iv., p. 237, fig.Google Scholar
1901. Melvill, J. C., and Standen, R., “Mollusca collected by Mr Rupert Vallentin at Stanley Harbour, Falkland Isles, 1897–99,” Journ. of Conch., x., pp. 43–47.Google Scholar
1902. Smith, Edgar A., “On the Supposed Similarity between the Mollusca of the Arctic and the Antarctic Regions,” P. Malac. Soc. Lond., v., pp. 162–166.Google Scholar
1902. Smith, Edgar A., Report on the Collections of Natural History made in the Antarctic Regions during the Voyage of the “Southern Cross”: Mollusca, pp. 201–213, pls. xxiv., xxv., London, 1902. [New species of Clione, Eatoniella, Lamellaria, Natica, Newnesia, gen. nov., Paludestrina, Pecten, Philine, and Rissoa.]Google Scholar
1902. Jhering, H. Von, “Die Photinula-Avtea des Magellan-Strasse,” Nachrichtsbl. deutsch. malak. Ges., 1902, pp. 97–104. [Photinula lahillei, sp. n., Patagonia.]Google Scholar
1902. Dall, W. Healey, “Illustrations and Descriptions of New, Unfigured, or Imperfectly Known Shells, chiefly American, in the U.S. National Museum,” P. U.S. Mus., xxiv., pp. 499–566, pls. xxvii.–xl. [Toledonia perplexa, Str. of Magellan; Antistreptus magellanicus, Str. of Magellan, gen. and spp. n.; Trophon perelectus, Patagonia, sp. n.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1902. Dall, W. Healey, “Notes on the Giant Limas,” Nautilus, xvi., pp. 15–17. [Lima patagonica, sp. n.]Google Scholar
1902. Martens, E. Von, “Einige neue Arten von Meer-Conchylien aus den Sammlungcn der deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition,” Sitzungsb. Ges. Natur. Berlin, 1902, pp. 237–244. [Puncturella analoga, sp. n., Kerguelen I.]Google Scholar
1903. Bartsch, P., “A New Scissurella from Patagonia,” Nautilus, xvii., pp. 90, 91. [Scissurella dalli, sp. n.]Google Scholar
1903. Martens, E. Von, “Die beschalten Gastropoden der deutschen Tiefsee - Expedition, 1898–99: A. Systematisch-geographischer Teil,” Wiss. Ergebn. deutschen Tiefsee-Exped…. Carl Chun, vol. vii., pp. 1–146, pls. i.–v. [Lachesis australis, Odostomiopsis typica and circumrosa, spp. n., Kerguelen I.; Scalaria instricta, Solariella periomphalia, spp. n., Neu Amsterdam.]Google Scholar
1903. Pelseneer, P., Résultats du Voyage du S.T. “Belgica”; Zoologie, “Mollusques (Amphineures, Gastropodes, et Lamellibranches),” Anvers, 1903, 85 pp., 9 pls. [Nov. sp. of Adacnarca (n. gen.), Bathyarca, Callocardia, Capulus, Cyamium, Cyclostrema, Dacrydium, Lævilitorina, Leda, Leptochiton, Limopsis, Margarita, Pecten, Philobrya, Rissoa, Scissurella, Sipho, Tergipes, Tharsis.]Google Scholar
1903. Joubin, L., Résultats du Voyage du S.Y. “Belgica”: Zoologie, “Mollusques (Céphalopodes),” Anvers, 1903, 4 pp.Google Scholar
1904. Vallentin, R., “Notes on the Falkland Islands,” Mem. Manchester Soc., xlviii., No. 23. 50 pp.Google Scholar
1904–1906. Strebel, Hermann, “Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Mollusken-Fauna der Magalhaen Provinz”:—Google Scholar
[An exhaustive treatise on the Molluscan fauna of the Falkland Islands, with many new species described of Trophon, Photinula, Margarita, Calliostoma, Euthria, Savatira, Thesbia, Bela, Drillia, Anoacme (gen. nov.), Admete, Actæon, Utriculus, Columbella, Bittium, and Euthria. Likewise Voluta martinsi, Natica anderssoni, Lamellaria fuegiensis, ampla, elata, magellanica, spp. nov. N.B.—This monograph is not yet complete.]Google Scholar
1905. Eliot, Sir C. N. E., “The Nudibranchiata of the Scottish National Antarctic Expedition,” Trans. Royal Soc. Edin., xli., pp. 519–532, figs. [Notæolidea gigas, purpurea, spp. n., South Orkneys; Tritonia appendiculata, sp. n., South Orkneys; Tritoniopsis brucei, sp. n., Gough Island.]Google Scholar
1905. Smith, Edgar A., “On a Small Collection of Mollusca from Tierra del Fuego,” P. Malac. Soc. Lond., vi., pp. 333–339, figs. [Chione fuegiensis, Mactra fuegiensis, Photinula crawshayi, roseolineata, spp. n.]Google Scholar
1905. Joubin, L., “Description de deux Elédones provenant de l'Expédition du Dr Charcot dans l'Antarctique,” Mem. Soc. Zool. France, xviii., pp. 22–31, pl. iii. [Eledone charcoti, turqueti, spp. n.]Google Scholar
1906. Lamy, E., “Gastropodes Prosobranches recueillis par l'Expédition Antarctique Française du Dr Charcot,” Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat. (1905), Paris, pp. 475–483, figs. [Cerithium charcoti, Lacuna wandelensis, Rissoia turqueti, Turbonilla madrinensix, Margarita antarctica, spp. n.]Google Scholar
1906. Lamy, E., “Lamellibranches recueillis par l'Expédition Antarctique Française du Dr Charcot,” Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat. (1905), Paris, pp. 44–52. [Mactra laminifera, Montaguia charcoti, turqueti, Philobrya wandelensis, sublævis, spp. n.]Google Scholar
1906. Lamy, E., Expédition Antarctique Française (1903–1905) commandée par le Dr Jean Charcot: Mollusques, “Gastropodes et Pelecypodes,” pp. 19, pl. i., Paris (1906). [The species mentioned above redescribed and figured, with, in addition, Pecten racovitzai, Pelseneer, sp. n.]Google Scholar
1906. Vayssière, A., Expédition Antarctique Française (1903–1905) commandée par le Dr Jean Charcot: Mollusques: “Nudibranches et Marséniades,” pp. 1–51, pl. iv. [Guyvalvoria françaisi, Charcotia granulosa, Rhodoplana wandeli, Archidoris tuberculata, Lamellariopsis turqueti, Marseniopsis antarctica, spp. n.]Google Scholar
1906. Thiele, J., Expédition Antarctique Française (1903–1905) commandée par le Dr Jean Charcot: Mollusques: “Amphineures,” pp. 3.Google Scholar
1906. Thiele, J., Archæomenia prisca, n. gen. n sp., mit 1 Tafel.Google Scholar
1906. Thiele, J., Ueber die Chitonen der deutsche Tiefsee-Expedition, mit 1 Tafel.Google Scholar
1906. Thiele, J., Abdruck aus Wissensch. Ergebn. der deutuch. Tieftee-Exped. “Valdivia,” 1893–1899 (Carl Chun), Jena, 1906, pp. 317–336, Tafel xxix.Google Scholar
1906. Lamy, E., “Sur quelques Mollusques des Orcades du Sud,” Bulletin du Muséum d'Histoire Nat. Paris (1906), pp. 121–126, figs. [Kellyia anstralis, Yoldia inæquisculpta, Vallettei, spp. n.]Google Scholar
1907. Smith, Edgar A., National Antarctic Expedition, “Discovery,” Nat. Hist., vol. ii., “Mollusca and Brachiopoda,” pls. iii., pp. 1–12. [Neobuccinum tenerum, Troschelia, sp., Trophon longstaffi, coulmanensis, Thesbia? innocens, Admete delicatula, Amauropsis? rossiana, Neoconcha (n. gen.) vestita, Trichoconcha (n. gen.) mirabilis, Eulima convexa, Scala antarctica, Rissoia fraudulenta, gelida, deserta, glacialis, Lovenella antarctica, Valvatella dulcis, crebrilirudata, refulgens, minutissima, Lepeta antarctica, Bullinella gelida, Chætopleura miranda, Cuspidaria tenella, Cardita antarctica, Kellia simulans, Tellimya antarctica, Cyamium denticulatum, Diplodonta incerta, Philobrya limoides, Limopsis grandis, hodgsoni, spp. n.]Google Scholar