Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:52:54.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Training Package for Emergency Medical Teams Deployed to Disaster Stricken Areas: Has ‘TEAMS’ Achieved its Goals?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2021

Moran Bodas
Affiliation:
Israel National Center for Trauma & Emergency Medicine Research, The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel The Department of Emergency Management & Disaster Medicine, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Kobi Peleg
Affiliation:
Israel National Center for Trauma & Emergency Medicine Research, The Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel The Department of Emergency Management & Disaster Medicine, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Bruria Adini
Affiliation:
The Department of Emergency Management & Disaster Medicine, School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Tel-Aviv, Israel
Luca Ragazzoni*
Affiliation:
CRIMEDIM - Research Center in Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
*
Corresponding author: Luca Ragazzoni, MD, PhD E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

In spite of their good intentions, Emergency Medical Teams (EMTs) were relatively disorganized for many years. To enhance the efficient provision of EMT’s field team work, the Training for Emergency Medical Teams and European Medical Corps (TEAMS) project was established. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness and quality of the TEAMS training package in 2 pilot training programs in Germany and Turkey. A total of 19 German and 29 Turkish participants completed the TEAMS training package. Participants were asked to complete a set of questionnaires designed to assess self-efficacy, team work, and quality of training. The results suggest an improvement for both teams’ self-efficacy and team work. The self-efficacy scale improved from 3.912 (± 0.655 SD) prior to training to 4.580 (± 0.369 SD) after training (out of 5). Team work improved from 3.085 (± 0.591 SD) to 3.556 (± 0.339 SD) (out of 4). The overall mean score of the quality of the training scale was 4.443 (± 0.671 SD) (out of 5). In conclusion, The TEAMS Training Package for Emergency Medical Teams has been demonstrated to be effective in promoting EMT team work capacities, and it is considered by its users to be a useful and appropriate tool for addressing their perceived needs.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© 2021 Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters and Emergencies (CRED) and United Nation’s Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR). (2018). Economic Losses, Poverty and Disasters 1998-2017. https://www.cred.be/sites/default/files/CRED_Economic_Losses_10oct.pdf Accessed December 26, 2018.Google Scholar
Brolin, K, Hawajri, O, von Schreeb, J. Foreign Medical Teams in the Philippines after Typhoon Haiyan 2013 - Who Were They, When Did They Arrive and What Did They Do? PLoS Curr. 2015;7:ecurrents.dis.0cadd59590724486bffe9a0340b3e718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Emergency Medical Teams Initiative. https://extranet.who.int/emt/ Accessed December 26, 2018.Google Scholar
European Commission (EC). European Medical Corps. http://ec.europa.eu/echo/what-we-do/civil-protection/european-medical-corps_en. Accessed December 26, 2018.Google Scholar
Djalali, A, Ingrassia, PL, Della Corte, F, et al. Identifying Deficiencies in National and Foreign Medical Team Responses through Expert Opinion Surveys: Implications for Education and Training. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(4):364-368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amat Camacho, N, Hughes, A, Burkle, FM Jr., et al. Education and Training of Emergency Medical Teams: Recommendations for a Global Operational Learning Framework. PLoS Curr. 2016;8:ecurrents.dis.292033689209611ad5e4a7a3e61520d0.Google ScholarPubMed
Wenji, Z, Turale, S, Stone, TE, Petrini, MA. Chinese Nurses’ Relief Experiences following Two Earthquakes: Implications for Disaster Education and Policy Development. Nurse Educ Pract. 2015;15(1):75-81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veenema, TG, Griffin, A, Gable, AR, et al. Nurses as Leaders in Disaster Preparedness and Response - A Call to Action. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2016;48(2):187-200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tzeng, WC, Feng, HP, Cheng, WT, et al. Readiness of Hospital Nurses for Disaster Responses in Taiwan: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;47:37-42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, G, Gully, SM, Eden, D. Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale. ORM. 2001:4(1):62-83.Google Scholar
Cooper, S, Cant, R, Porter, J, et al. Rating Medical Emergency Team Performance: Development of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM). Resuscitation. 2010;81(4):446-452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walmsley, M, Blum, P. Disaster Management in a Low-Resource Setting: The Role of Anaesthetists in International Emergency Medical Teams. BJA CEPD Reviews. 2016;17(1):22-27.Google Scholar
Albina, A, Archer, L, Boivin, M, et al. International Emergency Medical Teams Training Workshop Special Report. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018; 33(3):335-338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lam, HY, Gundran, CPD, Lopez, JCF, Santamaria, EB, Tuazon, ACA, Enabling Factors, Tayao L., Hindrances, and Self-Perceived Level of Preparedness of Typhoon Haiyan Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Responders. Acta Medica Philippina. 2018;52(2):160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watters, C, Reedy, G, Ross, A, Morgan, NJ, Handslip, R, Jaye, P. Does Interprofessional Simulation Increase Self-Efficacy: A Comparative Study. BMJ Open; 2015;5(1):e005472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiocchio, F, Rabbat, F, Lebel, P. Multi-level Efficacy Evidence of a Combined Interprofessional Collaboration and Project Management Training Program for Healthcare Project Teams. Proj Manag J. 2015;46(4):20-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahmati-Najarkolaei, F, Moeeni, A, Ebadi, A, Heidaranlu, E. Assessment of a Military Hospital’s Disaster Preparedness Using a Health Incident Command System. Trauma Mon. 2017;22(2) e31448.Google Scholar
Zagelbaum, NK, Heslin, KC, Stein, JA, et al. Factors Influencing Readiness to Deploy in Disaster Response: Findings From a Cross-Sectional Survey of the Department of Veterans Affairs Disaster Emergency Medical Personnel System. BMC Emerg Med. 2014;14(1):16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosander, M, Jonson, CO. Professional Confidence in the Roles as Ambulance and Medical Incident Commander. JCCM. 2017;25(4):289-300.Google Scholar
Ross, EM, Redman, TT, Mapp, JG, et al. Stop The Bleed: The Effect Of Hemorrhage Control Education on Laypersons’ Willingness to Respond During a Traumatic Medical Emergency. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(2):127-132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Bodas et al. supplementary material

Bodas et al. supplementary material

Download Bodas et al. supplementary material(File)
File 254.6 KB