Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T20:48:19.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of the Aliso Canyon Gas Leak on Respiratory-Related Conditions Among US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Users

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2018

Lilia R. Lukowsky ,
Claudia Der-Martirosian ,
Alicia R. Gable  and
Aram Dobalian
Lilia R. Lukowsky*
Affiliation:
Veterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, North Hills, California
Claudia Der-Martirosian
Affiliation:
Veterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, North Hills, California
Alicia R. Gable
Affiliation:
Veterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, North Hills, California
Aram Dobalian
Affiliation:
Veterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, North Hills, California Division of Health Systems Management and Policy, University of Memphis School of Public Health, Memphis, Tennessee
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Lilia Lukowsky, Veterans Emergency Management Evaluation Center, 16111 Plummer Street MS-152, North Hills, CA 91343 (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

The largest gas leak in United States history occurred October 2015 through February 2016 near Porter Ranch (PR), California, and prompted the temporary relocation of nearby residents because of health concerns related to natural gas exposure.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) administrative and clinical data. On the basis of zip codes, we created two groups: PR (1920 patients) and San Fernando Valley (SFV) (15 260 patients) and examined the proportion of outpatient visits to VA providers with respiratory-related diagnoses between October 2014 and September 2017.

Results

We observed an increase in the proportion of visits in the PR group during the leak (7.0% vs 6.1%, P<0.005) and immediately after the leak (7.7% vs 5.3%, P<0.0001). For both groups, we observed a decrease in respiratory diagnoses one year after the leak (7.0% to 5.9%, P<0.05 PR; 6.1% to 5.7%, P<0.01 SFV).

Conclusion

Exposure to natural gas likely led to the observed increase in respiratory-related diagnoses during and after the PR gas leak. Early relocation following natural gas leaks may mitigate respiratory exacerbations. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2019;13:419-423)

Type
Brief Report
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , June 2019 , pp. 419 - 423
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Conley, S, Franco, G, Faloona, I, et al. Methane emissions from the 2015 Aliso Canyon blowout in Los Angeles, CA. Science. 2016;351(6279):1317-1320.Google Scholar
2. Adgate, JL, Goldstein, BD, McKenzie, LM. Potential public health hazards, exposures and health effects from unconventional natural gas development. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(15):8307–8320.Google Scholar
3. Steinzor, N, Subra, W, Sumi, L. Investigating links between shale gas development and health impacts through a community survey project in Pennsylvania. New Salut. 2013;23(1):55–83.Google Scholar
4. Rabinowitz, PM, Slizovskiy, IB, Lamers, V, et al. Proximity to natural gas wells and reported health status: results of a household survey in Washington County, Pennsylvania. Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123(1):21.Google Scholar
5. McKenzie, LM, Witter, RZ, Newman, LS, et al. Human health risk assessment of air emissions from development of unconventional natural gas resources. Sci Total Environ. 2012;424:79–87.Google Scholar
6. Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. Aliso Canyon Gas Leak Results of Air Monitoring and Assessments of Health. http://www.publichealth.lacounty.gov/media/docs/AlisoAir.pdf. Published February 5, 2016. Accessed September 19, 2017.Google Scholar
7. Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. Aliso Canyon Gas Leak Public Health Assessment. http://www.publichealth.lacounty.gov/media/docs/PublicHealthAssessment.pdf. Accessed Sep, 19, 2017.Google Scholar
8. Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. Aliso Canyon Gas Leak Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPER). http://publichealth.lacounty.gov/media/docs/CASPERFinalReport.pdf. Accessed November 2, 2017.Google Scholar
9. Rangan C. Public Health Implications of Findings From the Gas Storage Well Safety Review and Proposed Pressure Limits for the Aliso Canyon Storage Facility. http://publichealth.lacounty.gov/media/docs/AlisoCanyon.pdf. Accessed September 19, 2017.Google Scholar
10. Walton A. City attorney demands faster relocation of residents near Porter Ranch gas leak. Los Angles Times. http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-porter-ranch-relocation-20151222-story.html#. Published December 22, 2015. Accessed November 27, 2017.Google Scholar