Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T05:03:14.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Tabletop Exercises on Participants’ Knowledge of and Confidence in Legal Authorities for Infectious Disease Emergencies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2013

Elena Savoia ,
Paul D. Biddinger ,
Priscilla Fox ,
Donna E. Levin ,
Lisa Stone  and
Michael A. Stoto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective: Legal preparedness is a critical component of comprehensive public health preparedness for public health emergencies. The scope of this study was to assess the usefulness of combining didactic sessions with a tabletop exercise as educational tools in legal preparedness, to assess the impact of the exercise on the participants’ level of confidence about the legal preparedness of a public health system, and to identify legal issue areas in need of further improvement.

Methods: The exercise scenario and the pre- and postexercise evaluation were designed to assess knowledge gained and level of confidence in declaration of emergencies, isolation and quarantine, restrictions (including curfew) on the movement of people, closure of public places, and mass prophylaxis, and to identify legal preparedness areas most in need of further improvement at the system level. Fisher exact test and paired t test were performed to compare pre- and postexercise results.

Results: Our analysis shows that a combination of didactic teaching and experiential learning through a tabletop exercise regarding legal preparedness for infectious disease emergencies can be effective in both imparting perceived knowledge to participants and gathering information about sufficiency of authorities and existence of gaps.

Conclusions: The exercise provided a valuable forum to judge the adequacy of legal authorities, policies, and procedures for dealing with pandemic influenza at the state and local levels in Massachusetts. In general, participants were more confident about the availability and sufficiency of legal authorities than they were about policies and procedures for implementing them. Participants were also more likely to report the need for improvement in authorities, policies, and procedures in the private sector and at the local level than at the state level. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2009;3:104–110)

Keywords

legal preparednessemergency preparednesspublic health system
Type
Original Research and Critical Analysis
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 104 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Moulton, AD, Gottfried, RN, Goodman, RA, et alWhat is public health legal preparedness? J Law Med Ethics. 2003;31:672–683.Google Scholar
2.Hodge, JG, Gebbie, KM, Hoke, C, et alAssessing competencies for public health emergency legal preparedness. J Law Med Ethics. 2008;36 (Suppl 1)28–35.Google Scholar
3.O’Brien, D Jr, Rees, CM, Abbott, E, et alImproving information and best practices for public health emergency legal preparedness. J Law Med Ethics. 2008;36 (Suppl 1)64–67.Google Scholar
4.Bullard, CH, Hogan, RD, Penn, MS, et alImproving cross-sectoral and cross-jurisdictional coordination for public health emergency legal preparedness. J Law Med Ethics. 2008;36 (Suppl 1)57–63.Google Scholar
5.Gebbie, KM, Hodge, JG Jr, Meier, BM, et alImproving competencies for public health emergency legal preparedness. J Law Med Ethics. 2008;36 (Suppl 1)52–56.Google Scholar
6.Pestronk, RM, Kamoie, B, FidlerD, , et alImproving laws and legal authorities for public health emergency legal preparedness. J Law Med Ethics. 2008;36 (Suppl 1)47–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. World Health Organization Writing Group. Non-pharmaceutical Interventions for Pandemic Influenza, International Measures. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol12no01/05-1370.htm. Accessed January 25, 2008.Google Scholar
8.Bootsma, MC, Ferguson, NM.The effect of public health measures on the 1918 influenza pandemic in US cities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:7588–7593.Google Scholar
9.Hatchett, RJ, Mecher, CE, Lipstich, M.Public health interventions and epidemic intensity during the 1918 influenza pandemic. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:7582–7587.Google Scholar
10.Aledort, JE, Lurie, N, Wasserman, J, et alNon-pharmaceutical public health interventions for pandemic influenza: an evaluation of the evidence base. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:208.Google Scholar
11.Duerr, HP, Brockmann, SO, Piechotowski, I, et alInfluenza pandemic intervention planning using InfluSim: pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical interventions. BMC Infect Dis. 2007;7:76.Google Scholar
12.Bell, DM, World Health Organization Working Group. Non-pharmaceutical interventions for pandemic influenza, national and community measures. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:88–94.Google Scholar
13.Weiss, RI, McKie, KL, Goodman, RA.The law and emergencies: surveillance for public health-related legal issues during Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Am J Public Health. 2007;97 (Suppl 1)73–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Hodge, JG.Legal issues concerning volunteer health professionals and the hurricane-related emergencies in the Gulf Coast region. Public Health Rep. 2006;121:205–207.Google Scholar
15.Kamoie, B.The National Response Plan and legal issues in public health emergency preparedness. Public Health Rep. 2005;120:571–573.Google Scholar
16.Jackson, JZ, McBride, AF, Robertson, JA.Legal issues involving preparedness in New Jersey. An initial discourse. NJ Med. 2004;101 (Suppl 9)9–16.Google Scholar
17. American Civil Liberty Union Report: Government Must Abandon Misguided Approach to Pandemic Preparedness. http://www.aclu.org/privacy/gen/33649prs20080114.html. Accessed April 12, 2009.Google Scholar
18.Benjamin, GC, Moulton, AD.Public health legal preparedness: a framework for action. J Law Med Ethics. 2008;36 (Suppl 1)13–17.Google Scholar
19. Legal workshop didactic material. Harvard School of Public Health Web site. http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hcphp/products-and-training/exercises-and-drills/index.html. Accessed April 12, 2009.Google Scholar
20.Biddinger, PD, Cadigan, RO, Auerbach, BS, et alUsing exercises to identify systems-level preparedness challenges. Public Health Rep. 2008;123:96–101.Google Scholar
21.Dausey, DJ, Buehler, JW, Lurie, N.Designing and conducting tabletop exercises to assess public health preparedness for manmade and naturally occurring biological threats. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:92.Google Scholar
22.Agwunobi, JO, Feigenholtz, S, Levin, DE, et alAre you ready for the next outbreak? An exercise in legal preparedness. J Law Med Ethics. 2004;32 (Suppl 4)77–78.Google Scholar
23.Heaton, JA, Murphy, AM, Allan, S, et alLegal preparedness for public health emergencies: TOPOFF 2 and other lessons. J Law Med Ethics. 2003;31 (Suppl 4)43–44.Google Scholar
24.Matthews, GW, Murphy, AM, Lopez, W, et alWorkshop on smallpox legal preparedness: what have we learned from smallpox legal preparedness? J Law Med Ethics. 2003;31 (Suppl 4)39–40.Google Scholar