Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:11:32.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Theory of How Rumours Arise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Gérald Bronner
Gérald Bronner*
Affiliation:
University of Paris-Sorbonne
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As it happens, we are quite well aware of the origin of a group belief. For instance, the history of baseball in the USA is a kind of contemporary myth whose origin, however, is not mysterious. In the US there is a place called the Hall of Fame dedicated to the great figures in baseball history. The spot can be found in Cooperstown, a small American town in the middle of New York state, that is otherwise totally unremarkable. Why was a building put up there to celebrate the sport that is so emblematic of the United States? Simply because the famous baseball is supposed to have been invented there by one Abner Doubleday in 1839. The date is precise but the myth of origins associated with it is no less so. In the early 19th century Doubleday is alleged to have interrupted some children playing marbles behind the shop belonging to the town's tailor. Then he is supposed to have started to teach them the rules of a new, more exciting game which he had just invented (if we adhere to this myth of origins) and which he proposed to call ‘baseball’. So he marked out a small-scale field on the ground: the first game of this typically American sport could now begin.

Type
Articles
Information
Diogenes , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , February 2007 , pp. 83 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2007

References

Abric, J. C. (1989) ‘L’étude expérimentale des représentations sociales’, in Les représentations sociales (Editions Jodelet). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Argote, L., Seabright, M. A. and Dyer, L. (1986) ‘Individual versus Group Use of Base-Rate and Individuating Information’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 38: 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J. L. (1996) ‘Exploring the Natural Foundations of Religion’, Trends in Cognitive Science 4(1): 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthelot, J. M. (1996) Les vertus de l’incertitude. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Bronner, G. (2003) L’empire des croyances. Paris: PUF.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronner, G. (2006) Vies et morts des croyances collectives. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Campion-Vincent, V. and Renard, J. B. (2002) Légendes urbaines - rumeurs d’aujourd’hui. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Changeux, J. P. (2002) L’homme de vérité. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Doise, W. (1985) ‘Les représentations sociales: définition d’un concept’, Connexions 45: 245–253.Google Scholar
Fischhoff, B. (1984) ‘For Those Condemned to Study the Past: Heuristics and Biases in Hindsight’, in Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. and Slovic, P. (eds), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kapferer, J-N. (1995) Rumeurs. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Moliner, P. (ed.) (2001) La dynamique des représentations sociales. Grenoble: PUG.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. E. and Ross, L. (1980) Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. and Lichtenstein, S. (1984) ‘Facts Versus Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk’, in Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. and Slovic, P. (eds) Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vergès, P. (1992) ‘L’évocation de l’argent: une méthode pour la définition du noyau central d’une représentation’, Bulletin de Psychologie XLV(405): 203–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vergès, P. (1994) ‘Approche du noyau central: propriétés quantitatives et structurales’, in Guimelli, C. (ed.), Structure et transformations des représentations sociales. Neuchâtel/Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar