Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:20:08.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to “Commentaire sur le texte de Sr Prudence Allen par Jocelyne St-Arnaud”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Prudence Allen
Prudence Allen
Affiliation:
Concordia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I appreciate very much the thoroughness with which Jocelyne St-Arnaud has analyzed the text of my paper. As she points out, the major source of difference between our approach to the authors under consideration derives from a preference for an ethical and political perspective on her side and a preference for a metaphysical perspective on mine. However, there are a few key points in interpretation that need to be addressed which go beyond this central difference in orientation.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , Summer 1987 , pp. 277 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Allen, Prudence, R.S.M., The Concept of Woman: The Aristotelian Revolution (Montreal and London: Eden Press, 1985)Google Scholar.