Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:09:45.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegel’s Pragmatic Critique and Reconstruction of Kant’s System of Principles in the Logic and Encyclopaedia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2015

KENNETH R. WESTPHAL
KENNETH R. WESTPHAL*
Affiliation:
Boğaziçi Üniversitesi (İstanbul)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the Science of Logic and Philosophical Encyclopaedia, Hegel reconstructs Kant’s Critical philosophy by developing: a transcendental logic in the Science of Logic and Philosophy of Nature (§2), a pragmatic account of the a priori (§3), and a crucial use of the verb “realisieren” in connection with concepts and principles (§4). These three points are central to Hegel’s specifically cognitive semantics, which Hegel developed from Kant’s Thesis of Singular Cognitive Reference into a systematic, pragmatic realism. Hegel’s re-analysis of Kant’s Critical philosophy is thus the first and still one of the most adequate forms of pragmatic realism.

Dans la Science de la logique et dans l’Encyclopédie des sciences philosophiques, Hegel reconstruit la philosophie critique de Kant en développant i) une logique transcendantale dans la Science de la logique et dans la Philosophie de la nature (§2); ii) une conception pragmatique de l’a priori (§3); et iii) une caractéristique-clé de l’usage du verbe «réaliser» (realisieren) en relation avec les concepts et les principes (§4). Chacun de ces trois éléments constitue un aspect central de la sémantique spécifiquement cognitive de Hegel, que celui-ci développe, en partant de la thèse kantienne de la référence cognitive singulière, en un réalisme pragmatique systématique.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 333 - 369
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, William P. 1986 “Epistemic Circularity.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47.1:1–30; rpt. in idem., Epistemic Justification: Essays in Epistemology (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989), 319–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckermann, Ansgar, Flohr, Hans and Kim, Jagwon, eds. 1992 Emergence or Reduction? Essays on the Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick 1993 “Hegel’s Historicism.” In: idem., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Hegel (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), 270–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick 1995 “Hegel, A Non-Metaphysician? A Polemic.” Review of Englehardt, H. T. and Pinkard, T., eds., Hegel Reconsidered: Beyond Metaphysics and the Authoritarian State. Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 34:1–13.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick 1996 “Response to Pinkard.” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 34:21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick 2002 German Idealism: The Struggle against Subjectivism, 1781–1801. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick 2005 Hegel. New York, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, Robert 2000 Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, Robert 2001 “Modality, Normativity, and Intentionality.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63.3:587–609.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert 2008 Between Saying and Doing: Towards an Analytic Pragmatism. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, Robert 2014 “A Spirit of Trust: A Semantic Reading of Hegel's Phenomenology” (draft: 2014), http://www.pitt.edu/∼brandom/spirit_of_trust_2014.html; ms. accessed: 23 May 2014.Google Scholar
Burbidge, John 1996 Real Process: How Logic and Chemistry Combine in Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Burbidge, John 2007 Hegel’s Systematic Contingency. Baisingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burbidge, John 2011 “Conceiving.” In: Houlgate, S. and Baur, M., eds., The Blackwell Companion to Hegel (Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell), 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caird, Edward 1889 The Critical Philosophy of Immanuel Kant, 2 vols. Glasgow, Maclehose.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf 1950 Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Caruthers, Peter 1987 “Conceptual Pragmatism.” Synthese 73:205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, Konrad 1976 “Bemerkungen zu Hegels Begriff vom Bewußtsein in der Einleitung zur Phänomenologie des Geistes.” In: Guzzione, U., Rank, B. & Siep, L., eds., Der Idealismus und seine Gegenwart. Festschrift für Werner Marx (Hamburg, Meiner), 75–100; rpt. in: R.-P. Horstmann, ed., Seminar: Dialektik in der Philosophie Hegels (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1978), 360–393.Google Scholar
Cramer, Konrad 1985 Nicht-reine synthetische Urteile a priori. Ein Problem der Transzendentalphilosophie Immanuel Kants. Heidelberg, C. Winter.Google Scholar
de Laurentiis, Allegra 2009 “Absolute Knowing.” In: Westphal, K. R., ed., The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit (Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell), 246–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Willem 1987 Hegel’s Theory of Mental Activity. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
de Vries, Willem 1991 “The Dialectic of Teleology.” Philosophical Topics 19.2:51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John 1920 Reconstruction in Philosophy. New York, Holt & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John 1930 Individualism Old and New. New York, Minton, Balch & Co.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1964–1976 Adam, C. and Tannery, P., eds., Oevres de Descartes. Rev. ed., Paris, Vrin/ C.N.R.S.Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1970 Descartes: Philosophical Letters. Kenny, A., tr. and ed. Oxford, The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
di Giovanni, George, and Harris, H. S., eds. and trs. 2000 Between Kant and Hegel: Texts in the Development of Post-Kantian Idealism, 2nd ed. Cambridge, Mass., Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Dohrn, Daniel 2009 “Robert Brandom über singuläre Termini.” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 63.3:453–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, Frederick I. 1981 Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, Mass., MIT/Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Dretske, Frederick I. 1986 “Misrepresentation.” In: Bogdan, R., ed., Belief: Form, Content, and Function (Oxford, Oxford University Press), 17–36.Google Scholar
Dretske, Frederick I. 1990 “The Epistemology of Belief.” In: Roth, M. D. & Ross, G., eds., Doubting (Dordrecht, Kluwer), 183–194; rpt. in: idem. (2000a), 64–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, Frederick I. 1994 “If You Can’t Make One, You Don’t Know how it Works.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 19:468–482; rpt. in: idem. (2000a), 208–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, Frederick I. 2000a Perception, Knowledge, and Belief: Selected Essays. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, Frederick I. 2000b “Norms, History, and the Constitution of the Mental.” In: idem. (2000a), 242–258.Google Scholar
Düsing, Klaus 1987 “Vernunfteinheit und unvordenkliches Daß-sein. Konzeptionen der Überwindung negativer Theologie bei Schelling und Hegel.” In: Gloy, K. and Schmidt, D., eds., Einheitskonzepte in der idealistischen und in der gegenwärtigen Philosophie (Bern, Lang), 109–136.Google Scholar
Eason, Robb, guest ed. 2007 Philosophy and Social Criticism 33.1 (special issue on Brandom’s treatment of Hegel).Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert 2000 Calaprice, A., ed., The Expanded Quotable Einstein. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Falkenburg, Brigitte 1987 Die Form der Materie. Zur Metaphysik der Natur bei Kant und Hegel. Frankfurt am Main, Athenaeum.Google Scholar
Ferrini, Cinzia 1988 “On the Relation Between ‘Mode’ and ‘Measure’ in Hegel’s Science of Logic: Some Introductory Remarks.” The Owl of Minerva 20.1:21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrini, Cinzia 1991–92 “Logica e filosofia della natura nella Dottrina dell'essere hegeliana,” Parts 1, 2. Rivista di storia della filosofia, new series, Part 1: 46.4 (1991):701–735, Part 2: 47.1 (1992):103–124.Google Scholar
Ferrini, Cinzia 2004 “Heavenly Bodies, Crystals and Organisms. The Key-Role of Chemical Affinity in Kant’s Critical Cosmogony.” In: idem., ed., Eredità kantiane (1804–2004). Questioni aperte e problemi irrisolti (Napoli, Bibliopolis), 277–317.Google Scholar
Ferrini, Cinzia 2009a “Reason Observing Nature.” In: Westphal, K. R., ed., The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit (London, Blackwell), 92–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrini, Cinzia 2009b “From Geological to Animal Nature in Hegel’s Idea of Life.” Hegel-Studien 44:45–93.Google Scholar
Ferrini, Cinzia 2010 “From the Physical World to the Habitat: Biocentrism in Hegel’s Interrelation of Animal Subjectivity with its Environment.” In: Breidbach, O. and Neuser, W., eds., Hegels Naturphilosophie in der Dritten Moderne. Bestimmungen, Probleme und Perspektiven (Ernst-Haeckel-Haus-Studien. Monographien zur Geschichte der Biowissenschaften und Medizin 13; Berlin, Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung), 119–135.Google Scholar
Ferrini, Cinzia 2011 “The Transition to Organics: Hegel’s Idea of Life.” In: Houlgate, S. and Baur, M., eds., The Blackwell Companion to Hegel (Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell), 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galilei, Galileo 1890–1910 Favaro, A., ed., Le Opere di Galileo Galilei, 20 vols. Fierenze, Edizione Nazionale, designated ‘Opere’.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo 1974 Two New Sciences, Drake, S., tr., Madison, University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Gersh, S, and Moran, Dermot, eds. 2006 Eriugena, Berkeley, and the Idealist Tradition. Notre Dame, Ind., University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Harris, H. S. 1997 Hegel’s Ladder, 2 vols. Cambridge, Mass., Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Klaus 1966 “On Taking the Transcendental Turn.” Review of Metaphysics 20.2: 223–249; rpt. in:idem. (1988), 192–219.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Klaus 1971 “Hegel: A Non-Metaphysical View.” In: MacIntyre, A., ed., Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays (Garden City, NJ, Doubleday), 101–124.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Klaus 1976 Die ontologische Option. Berlin, deGruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Klaus 1988 Studies in Foundational Philosophy. Amsterdam, Rodopoi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1802 “Verhältnis des Skeptizismus zur Philosophie. Darstellung seiner verschiedenen Modifikationen und Vergleichung des neuesten mit dem alten. Kritisches Journal der Philosophie, 1.2:1–74; rpt. in GW 4:197–238; tr. H. S. Harris in: di Giovanni and Harris (2000), 311–362.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1986–2009 Gesammelte Werke, 21 vols. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, with the Hegel-Kommission der Rheinisch-Westfälischen Akademie der Wissenschaften and the Hegel-Archiv der Ruhr-Universität Bochum. Hamburg, Meiner; cited as ‘GW’ by volume:page.line numbers. Individual works are indicated by their German initials.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 2010 The Science of Logic, tr. by Di Giovanni, G.. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. (Provides pagination of GW.)Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. forthcoming The Phenomenology of Spirit, tr. by Pinkard, T.. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. (Cited by consecutive paragraph numbers (¶) correctly provided by the translator.)Google Scholar
Hookway, Christopher 2002 Truth, Rationality, and Pragmatism: Themes from Peirce. Oxford, The Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hookway, Christopher 2003 “How to be a Virtue Epistemologist.” In: DePaul, M. and Zagzebski, L., eds., Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology (Oxford, The Clarendon Press), 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, William 1975 Bowers, F. & Skrupskelis, I., eds., Pragmatism: A new Name for some Old Ways of Thinking. Popular Lectures on Philosophy, with an Introduction by Thayer, H. S.. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press; first published: London & New York: Longmans, Green, 1907.Google Scholar
Kaag, John 2011 “Hegel, Peirce, and Royce on the Concept of Essence.” Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie 50:557–575; doi: 10.1017/S0012217311000540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1902– Kants Gesammelte Schriften. Königlich Preußische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin, G. Reimer (now De Gruyter); cited as ‘GS’ by volume:page numbers. Individual works are cited by their German initials.Google Scholar
Kaplan, David 1971 “Homage to Carnap.” In: Buck, R. and Cohen, R., eds., PSA 1970 (Dordrecht, Reidel), xlv–xlvii.Google Scholar
Lau, Chong Fuk 2004 Hegels Urteilskritik. Systematische Untersuchungen zum Grundproblem der spekulativen Logik. München, Fink.Google Scholar
Léonard, André 1974 Commentaire Littéral de la Logique de Hegel. Paris, Vrin; Louvain, Éditions de L’Insittut Supérieur de Philosophie.Google Scholar
Lewis, Clarence Irving 1929 Mind and the World Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge. New York, Charles Scribners; rev. ed.: New York: Dover, 1956.Google Scholar
McTaggart, John 1910 A Commentary on Hegel’s Logic. New York, Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
McTaggart, John 1912 Studies in the Hegelian Dialectic, 2nd ed. New York, Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert 1934 Morris, C., ed., Mind, Self and Society. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert 1964 Reck, A. J., ed., George Herbert Mead: Selected Writings. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretto, Antonio 2004 Filosofia della Matematica e della Meccanica del sistema Hegeliano, 2nd rev. ed. Padova, Il Poligrafo.Google Scholar
Murphey, Murray G. 2012 The Development of Quine’s Philosophy. Berlin, Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, Steven, ed. 2002 A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac 1999 The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Cohen, I. Bernard and Whitman, Anne, trs., with assistance from Budenz, Julia. Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 1989 Constructions of Reason. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 1992 “Vindicating Reason.” In: Guyer, P., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Kant (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), 280–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles Saunders 1877 “The Fixation of Belief.” Popular Science Monthly 12:1–15; rpt. in: CP 5:358–387; Writings 3:248–257.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Saunders 1931–35, 1958 Hartshorn, C., Weiss, P. and Burks, A. W., eds., Collected Papers of Charles Saunders Peirce. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press; designated ‘CP’, cited by volume:¶.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Saunders 1982–2000 Fisch, M., Kloesel, C. and Hauser, N., et al, eds., Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition (Bloomington: Indiana University Press), 7 vols. (to date); designated ‘Writings’.Google Scholar
Ploucquet, Gottfried [Godofredo] 1751 Dissertatio de Materialismo, cum supplementis et confutatione libelli: L’homme machine: inscripti. Tübingen, Erhardt.Google Scholar
Ploucquet, Gottfried 1753 Principia de Substantiis et Phaenomenis, 1st ed. Frankfurt am Main and Leipzig, Berger.Google Scholar
Ploucquet, Gottfried 1772 Institutiones Philosophiae Theoreticae sive de arte cogitandi, notionibus rerum fundamentalibus, Deo, Universo, et speciatim De Homine. Tübingen (n.p.).Google Scholar
Ploucquet, Gottfried 1778 Elementa Philosophiae Contemplativae sive De scientia ratiocinandi, notionibus disciplinarum fundamentalibus, Deo, Universo et speciatim De Homine. Stuttgart, Mezler.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1951a “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” Philosophical Review 60.1:20–43; rev. ed. in: idem. (1961), 20–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1951b “Ontology and Ideology.” Philosophical Studies 2.1:11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1961 From a Logical Point of View, 2nd rev. ed. New York, Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1990 “Three Indeterminacies.” In: Barrett, R. B. and Gibson, R. F., eds., Perspectives on Quine (Oxford, Blackwell), 1–16; rpt. in: idem. (2008), 368–386.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 2008 Føllesdal, D. and Quine, D., eds., Confessions of a Confirmed Extensionalist and Other Essays. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, Paul 2014 “The Role of ‘Logic Commonly So-Called’ in Hegel’s Science of Logic.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22.2:281–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, Paul 2015 “An Hegelian Solution to a Tangle of Problems Facing Brandom’s Analytic Pragmatism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy; doi: 10.1080/09608788.2014.984284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, Klaus 2001 Baum, M., Rameil, U., Reisinger, K. and Scholz, G., eds., Gesammelte Schriften. Hamburg, Meiner.Google Scholar
Richards, Robert 2002 The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1972 “The World Well Lost.” The Journal of Philosophy 69,19:649–665; rpt in: idem. (1982), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard 2009 Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, Princeton University Press; 1st ed. 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1982 Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rosenkranz, Sven 2001 “Farewell to Objectivity: A Critique of Brandom.” The Philosophical Quarterly 51.203:232–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sans, Georg 2004 Die Realisierung des Begriffs. Eine Untersuchung zu Hegels Schlusslehre. Berlin, Akademie Verlag (de Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. von 1805 “Aphorismen zur Einleitung in die Naturphilosophie.” Jahrbücher für Medizin als Wissenschaft 1:2–88.Google Scholar
Schulze, G. E. (Anon.) 1803 “Aphorismen über das Absolute.” In: Bouterwek, F., ed., Neues Museum der Philosophie und Literatur; Leipzig, 1.2:107–148; GoogleBooks (search): editions:RNHW360NkK8C.Google Scholar
Southgate, Henry 2014 “Hegel and the Identity of Indiscernibles. “ Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 96.1:71–103; doi: 10.1515/agph-2014-0004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stace, W. T. 1924 The Philosophy of Hegel: A Systematic Exposition. London, Macmillan; rpt.: New York: Dover, 1955.Google Scholar
Stekeler, Pirmin 2014 Hegels Phänomenologie des Geistes. Ein dialogischer Kommentar, 2 vols. Hamburg, Meiner.Google Scholar
Stewart, Jon, ed. 1996 The Hegel Myths and Legends. Evanston, Ill., Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Stovall, Preston forthcoming “Syllogistic Reasoning as the Ground of the Content of Judgment: A Line of Thought from Kant through Hegel to Peirce.” European Journal of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Surber, Jere Paul 2013 “Hegel’s Linguistic Thought in the Philosophy of Subjective Spirit: Between Kant and the ‘Metacritics’.” In: Stern, D., ed., Essays on Hegel’s Philososphy of Subjective Spirit (Albany, NY, SUNY Press), 181–200.Google Scholar
Theunissen, Michael 1975 “Begriff und Realität: Hegels Aufhebung des metaphysischen Wahrheitsbegriffs.” In: Schwan, A., ed., Denken im Schatten des Nihilismus. Festschrift für Wilhelm Weischedel (Darmstadt, Wissenschaflichte Buchgesellschaft); rpt. in: R.-P. Horstmann, ed., Seminar: Dialektik in der Philosophie Hegels (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1978), 324–359.Google Scholar
Theunissen, Michael 1978 Sein und Schein. Die kritische Funktion der Hegelschen Logik. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Trendelenburg, Adolf 1840 Logische Untersuchungen, vol. 1. Berlin, Bethge.Google Scholar
Trendelenburg, Adolf 1843 Die logische Frage in Hegel’s System. Zwei Streitschriften. Leipzig, Brockhaus.Google Scholar
Trendelenburg, Adolf 1846 Historische Beiträge zur Philosophie, vol. 1. Berlin, Bethge.Google Scholar
Turnbull, Robert G. 1959 “Empirical and A Priori Elements in Broad’s Theory of Knowledge.” In: Schilpp, P. A., ed., The Philosophy of C. D. Broad (New York, Tudor), 197–231.Google Scholar
Vihalemm, Rein 2011 “A Monistic or a Pluralistic View of Science: Why Bother?” Abhandlungen der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig—Philologisch-historische Klasse 82.1:79–93.Google Scholar
Vihalemm, Rein 2012 “Practical Realism: Against Standard Scientific Realism and Anti-Realism.” Studia Philosophica Estonica 5.2:7–22.Google Scholar
Vihalemm, Rein 2013 “Interpreting Kant’s Conception of Proper Science in Practical Realism.” Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum 1.2:5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, John 1881 Kant and his English Critics. A Comparison of Critical and Empirical Philosophy. Glasgow, Maclehose; New York, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Watson, John 1908 The Philosophy of Kant Explained. Glasgow, Maclehose.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 1989 Hegel’s Epistemological Realism: A Study of the Aim and Method of Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Dordrecht & Boston, Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 1996 “Kant, Hegel, and the Transcendental Material Conditions of Possible Experience.” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 33:23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 1998a Hegel, Hume und die Identität wahrnehmbarer Dinge. Historisch-kritische Analyse zum Kapitel „Wahrnehmung“ in der Phänomenologie von 1807. Frankfurt am Main, Klostermann.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 1998b “On Hegel’s Early Critique of Kant’s Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science.” In: Houlgate, S., ed., Hegel and the Philosophy of Nature (Albany, SUNY Press), 137–166.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 1998c “Hegel’s Solution to the Dilemma of the Criterion.” In: Stewart, J., ed., The Phenomenology of Spirit Reader: A Collection of Critical and Interpretive Essays (Albany, SUNY Press), 76–91.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 1998d “Buchdahl’s ‘Phenomenological’ View of Kant: A Critique.” Kant-Studien 89:335–352.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 1999 “‘Hegel’s’ Epistemology? Reflections on Some Recent Expositions.” Clio 28.3:303–323.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2000b “Kant, Hegel, and the Fate of ‘the’ Intuitive Intellect.” In: Sedgwick, S., ed., The Reception of Kant’s Critical Philosophy: Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel (New York, Cambridge University Press), 238–305.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2003a Hegel’s Epistemology: An Introduction to the Phenomenology of Spirit. Cambridge, Mass., Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2003b “Can Pragmatic Realists Argue Transcendentally?” In: Shook, J., ed., Pragmatic Naturalism and Realism (Buffalo, NY, Prometheus), 151–175.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2004 Kant’s Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2006 “Science and the Philosophers.” In: Koskinen, H., Pihlström, S., and Vilkko, R., eds., Science: A Challenge to Philosophy? (Frankfurt am Main, Lang), 125–52.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2007 “Consciousness and its Transcendental Conditions: Kant’s Anti-Cartesian Revolt.” In: Heinämaa, S., Lähteenmäki, V., & Remes, P., eds., Consciousness: From Perception to Reflection in the History of Philosophy (Dordrecht, Springer), 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2007–08 “Intelligenz and the Interpretation of Hegel’s Idealism: Some Hermeneutic Pointers.” The Owl of Minerva 39.1–2:95–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2008a “Philosophizing about Nature: Hegel’s Philosophical Project.” In: Beiser, F. C., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth Century Philosophy (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), 281–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2008b “Contemporary Epistemology: Kant, Hegel, McDowell.” In: Lindgaard, J., ed., John McDowell: Experience, Norm and Nature (Oxford, Blackwell), 124–151; doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0378.2006.00226.x/full.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2009a “Hegel’s Phenomenological Method and Analysis of Consciousness.” In: idem., ed., The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit (Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2009b “Consciousness, Scepticism and the Critique of Categorial Concepts in Hegel’s 1807 Phenomenology of Spirit.” In: Bykova, M. and Solopova, M., eds., Сущность и Слово. Сборник научных статей к юбилею профессора Н. В. Мотрошиловой (Moscow, Phenomenology & Hermeneutics Press), 357–376. (Volume title: Essence and Word. Festschrift for Professor N. V. Motroshilova.)Google ScholarPubMed
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2009c “Mutual Recognition and Rational Justification in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit.” Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie 48.4:1–47; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0012217309990412.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R., ed. 2009d The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2010a “Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason and Analytic Philosophy.” In: Guyer, P., ed., Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), 401–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2010b “Practical Reason: Categorical Imperative, Maxims, Laws.” In: Dudley, W. and Engelhard, K., eds., Kant: Key Concepts (London, Acumen), 103–119.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2010–11 “Analytic Philosophy and the Long Tail of Scientia: Hegel and the Historicity of Philosophy.” The Owl of Minerva 42.1–2:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2013a “Rational Justification and Mutual Recognition in Substantive Domains.” Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie 52:1–40; doi: 10.1017/S0012217313000796.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2013b “Objective Spirit: Right, Morality, Ethical Life, World History.” In: de Laurentiis, A. and Edwards, J., eds., The Bloomsbury Companion to Hegel (London, Bloomsbury), 157–178.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2013c “Hume, Empiricism and the Generality of Thought.” Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie 52.2:233–270; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0012217313000279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2014a “Hegel’s Semantics of Singular Cognitive Reference, Newton’s Methodological Rule Four and Scientific Realism Today.” Philosophical Inquiries 2.1:9–65; http://philinq.it/index.php/philinq/article/view/86/44Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2014b “Autonomy, Freedom and Embodiment: Hegel’s Critique of Contemporary Biologism.” The Hegel Bulletin (Cambridge University Press) 35.1:56–83; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/hgl.2014.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2015a “Hegel’s Pragmatic Critique and Reconstruction of Kant’s System of Principles in the 1807 Phenomenology of Spirit.” Hegel Bulletin (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2015b “Causal Realism and the Limits of Empiricism: Some Unexpected Insights from Hegel.” HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5.2 (Oct. 2015).Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2015c “Conventionalism and the Impoverishment of the Space of Reasons: Carnap, Quine and Sellars.” Journal for the History of Analytic Philosophy 3.8.Google Scholar
Wieland, Wolfgang 1966 “Hegel’s Dialektik der sinnlichen Gewißheit.” In: Gerhardt, D., ed., Orbis scriptus. Dmitrij Tschižewkij zum siebzigsten Geburtstag (München, Fink), 933–941; rpt. in: H. F. Fulda and D. Henrich, eds., Materialien zu Hegels Phänomenologie des Geistes (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1973), 67–82.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William 1995 “The Ontology of Complex Systems.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20:207–274.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William 2000 “Emergence as Non-Aggregativity and the Biases of Reductionisms.” Foundations of Science 5.3:269–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar