We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Dunn, J. M., and JrBelnap, N. D.. 1968 “The Substitutional Interpretation of the Quantifiers.” Nous, 2: 177–85.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob1967 “The Thought: A Logical Inquiry.” In Philosophical Logic. Edited by Strawson, P. F.. London: Oxford University Press, pp. 17–38.Google Scholar
Geach, Peter Thomas1980Reference and Generality. 3rd ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul1976 “Is There a Problem about Substitutional Quantification?” In Truth and Meaning. Edited by Evans, G. and McDowell, J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 325–419.Google Scholar
Leblanc, Hughes1976Truth- Value Semantics. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Paul, Lorenzen1971Differential and Integral. Translated by Bacon, John. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O.1967 “Reply to Marcus.” In Contemporary Readings in Logical Theory. Edited by Copi, I. M. and Gould, J. A.. London: Macmillan, pp. 293–99.Google Scholar
Tarski, Alfred1956 “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages.” In Logic, Semantics and Metamathematics. Translated by Woodger, J. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 152–278.Google Scholar