Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:32:16.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geach on Generalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Charles Sayward
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Lincon

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dunn, J. M., and JrBelnap, N. D.. 1968The Substitutional Interpretation of the Quantifiers.” Nous, 2: 177–85.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob 1967 “The Thought: A Logical Inquiry.” In Philosophical Logic. Edited by Strawson, P. F.. London: Oxford University Press, pp. 1738.Google Scholar
Geach, Peter Thomas 1980 Reference and Generality. 3rd ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul 1976 “Is There a Problem about Substitutional Quantification?” In Truth and Meaning. Edited by Evans, G. and McDowell, J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 325419.Google Scholar
Leblanc, Hughes 1976 Truth- Value Semantics. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Paul, Lorenzen 1971 Differential and Integral. Translated by Bacon, John. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1967 “Reply to Marcus.” In Contemporary Readings in Logical Theory. Edited by Copi, I. M. and Gould, J. A.. London: Macmillan, pp. 293–99.Google Scholar
Tarski, Alfred 1956 “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages.” In Logic, Semantics and Metamathematics. Translated by Woodger, J. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 152278.Google Scholar