Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:16:22.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conventional Norms of Reasoning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2011

Adam Morton
Adam Morton*
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

ABSTRACT: There are conventional norms of reasoning. That is, we have conventions about which patterns of reasoning we encourage or disapprove of.

RÉSUMÉ: Il existe des normes conventionnelles du raisonnement. C’est-à-dire que nous avons des conventions quant aux modèles de raisonnement que nous encourageons et désapprouvons.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 50 , Issue 2: Special Issue / Numéro spécial: Normativity: Epistemic, Mental and Moral Aspects / La Normativite : aspects epistemiques, mentaux et moraux , June 2011 , pp. 247 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, R. A. 2008 Design of Comparative Experiments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherniak, Christopher 1986 Minimal Rationality. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Cuneo, Terence 2007 The Normative Web. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demeter, Tamas 2010 “Mental Fictionalism.” Ph.D. diss., Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Elio, R., ed.2002 Common Sense, Reasoning, and Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbard, Allan 1990 Wise Choices, Apt Feelings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Gilbert 1999 Reasoning, Meaning, and Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David 1969 Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, Ruth 1984 Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papineau, David 1999 “Normativity and Judgement.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 73: 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, John 2006 Thinking about Acting: Logical Foundations for Rational Decision. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radder, Hans 2003 The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rips, Lance 2002 “Reasoning Imperialism.” In Common Sense, Reasoning, and Rationality, ed. Elio, Renée. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 215–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael 1994 The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Staley, K. W. 2004 “Robust Evidence and Secure Evidence Claims.” Philosophy of Science 71 (4): 467–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, David 2000 The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weirich, Paul 2004 Realistic Decision Theory: Rules for Nonideal Agents in Nonideal Circumstances. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar