Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:30:56.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts Volume 1: Logic and the Philosophy of LanguageNorman Kretzmann et Eleonore Stump, directeurs de la publication Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988, x, 531 p.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

Claude Lafleur
Claude Lafleur
Affiliation:
Université Laval
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews/Comptes rendus
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 31 , Issue 3: Philosophy in the Fourteenth Century , Summer 1992 , pp. 526 - 529
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note

1 Kretzmann, Norman, Kenny, Anthony et Pinborg, Jan, directeurs de la publication, The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy: From the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism, 1100–1600, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1982, xiv, 1035 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Pour renvoyer à cet ouvrage, j'utiliserai par la suite le sigle CHLMP. Pour un compte rendu qui met bien en évidence le caractère novateur de cette récente histoire de la philosophie – qu'on a qualifiée de «manifeste du médiévisme anglosaxon» (de Libera, Alain, Penser au Moyen Âge, Paris, Seuil, 1991, p. 362, n. 2Google Scholar) –, voir celui de Panaccio, C., The Philosophical Review, vol. 93, no 1 (1984), p. 155–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar