Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:59:45.053Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developmental interplay between children's biobehavioral risk and the parenting environment from toddler to early school age: Prediction of socialization outcomes in preadolescence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2014

Grazyna Kochanska ,
Lea J. Boldt ,
Sanghag Kim ,
Jeung Eun Yoon  and
Robert A. Philibert
Grazyna Kochanska*
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Lea J. Boldt
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Sanghag Kim
Affiliation:
Hanyang University
Jeung Eun Yoon
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Robert A. Philibert
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Grazyna Kochanska, Department of Psychology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242-1407; E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We followed 100 community families from toddler age to preadolescence. Each mother– and father–child dyad was observed at 25, 38, 52, 67, and 80 months (10 hr/child) to assess positive and power-assertive parenting. At age 10 (N = 82), we obtained parent- and child-reported outcome measures of children's acceptance of parental socialization: cooperation with parental monitoring, negative attitude toward substance use, internalization of adult values, and callous–unemotional tendencies. Children who carried a short serotonin transporter linked polymorphic region gene (5-HTTLPR) allele and were highly anger prone, based on anger observed in laboratory from 25 to 80 months, were classified as high in biobehavioral risk. The remaining children were classified as low in biobehavioral risk. Biobehavioral risk moderated links between parenting history and outcomes. For low-risk children, parenting measures were unrelated to outcomes. For children high in biobehavioral risk, variations in positive parenting predicted cooperation with monitoring and negative attitude toward substance use, and variations in power-assertive parenting predicted internalization of adult values and callous–unemotional tendencies. Suboptimal parenting combined with high biobehavioral risk resulted in the poorest outcomes. The effect for attitude toward substance use supported differential susceptibility: children high in biobehavioral risk who received optimal parenting had a more adaptive outcome than their low-risk peers. The remaining effects were consistent with diathesis–stress.

Type
Regular Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , August 2015 , pp. 775 - 790
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Allen, J. P., Chango, J., Szwedo, D., Schad, M., & Marston, E. (2012). Predictors of susceptibility to peer influence regarding substance use in adolescence. Child Development, 83, 337–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, J. P., Weissberg, R. P., & Hawkins, J. A. (1989). The relation between values and social competence in early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 25, 458–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, J. G., Faroy, M., Ebstein, R., Kahana, M., & Levine, J. (2001). The association of the dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4) and the serotonin transporter promotor gene (5-HTTLPR) with temperament in 12-month-old infants. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 6, 777–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, C. S., Newman, T. K., Lindell, S., Shannon, C., Champoux, M., Lesch, K. P., et al. (2004). Interaction between serotonin transporter gene variation and rearing condition in alcohol preference and consumption in female primates. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 1146–1152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, J. E, Pettit, G. S, Dodge, K.A., & Ridge, B. (1998). Interaction of temperamental resistance to control and restrictive parenting in the development of externalizing behavior. Developmental Psychology, 34, 982–995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, J. E., Schermerhorn, A. C., & Petersen, I. T. (2012). Temperament and parenting in developmental perspective. In Zentner, M. & Shiner, R. (Eds.), Handbook of temperament (pp. 425–441). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Belsky, J. (1997). Variation in susceptibility to rearing influences: An evolutionary argument. Psychological Inquiry, 8, 182–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). For better and for worse: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 300–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009a). Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 885–908.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009b). The nature (and nurture?) of plasticity in early human development. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 345–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2013). Genetic moderation of early child-care effects on social functioning across childhood: A developmental analysis. Child Development, 84, 1209–1225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bender, H. L., Allen, J. P., Boykin Mcelhaney, K., Antonishak, J., Moore, C. M., O'Beirne Kelly, H., et al. (2007). Use of harsh physical discipline and developmental outcomes in adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 227–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyce, W. T., & Ellis, B. J. (2005). Biological sensitivity to context: I. An evolutionary–developmental theory of the origins and functions of stress reactivity. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 271–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyer, T. W. (2006). The development of risk-taking: A multi-perspective review. Developmental Review, 26, 291–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2008). Infant temperament, parenting, and externalizing behavior in first grade: A test of the differential susceptibility hypothesis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 124–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, G. H., Beach, S. R. H., Philibert, R. A., Chen, Y., Lei, M. K., Murry, V. M., et al. (2009). Parenting moderates a genetic vulnerability factor in longitudinal increases in youths' substance use. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brody, G. H., Murry, V. M., Kogan, S. M., Gerrard, M., Gibbons, F. X., Molgaard, V., et al. (2006). The Strong African American Families Program: A cluster-randomized prevention trial of long-term effects and a mediational model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 356–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canli, T., & Lesch, K. (2009). Long story short: The serotonin transporter in emotion regulation and social cognition. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1103–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champoux, M., Bennett, A., Shannon, C., Higley, J. D., Lesch, K. P., & Suomi, S. J. (2002). Serotonin transporter gene polymorphism, differential early rearing, and behavior in rhesus monkey neonates. Molecular Psychiatry, 7, 1058–1063.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darling, N., Cumsille, P., & Martinez, M. L. (2008). Individual differences in adolescents' beliefs about the legitimacy of parental authority and their own obligation to obey: A longitudinal investigation. Child Development, 79, 1103–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. C., & Lynam, D. (2006). Aggression and antisocial behavior in youth. In Damon, W. & Lerner, R. M. (Series Eds.) & Eisenberg, N. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 719–788). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Duncan, L. E., & Keller, M. C. (2011). A critical review of the first 10 years of candidate gene-by-environment interaction research in psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 1041–1049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, B. J., Boyce, W. T., Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. J. (2011). Differential susceptibility to the environment: An evolutionary–neurodevelopmental theory. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frick, P. J. (2003). The Inventory of Callous–Unemotional Traits. Unpublished manuscript, University of New Orleans.Google Scholar
Frick, P. J., & Morris, A. S. (2004). Temperament and developmental pathways to conduct problems. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frick, P. J., & Viding, E. (2009). Antisocial behavior from a developmental psychopathology perspective. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 1111–1131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frick, P. J., & White, S. F. (2008). Research review: The importance of callous–unemotional traits for developmental models of aggressive and antisocial behavior. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 359–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gershoff, E. T. (2002). Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 539–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilliom, M., & Shaw, D.S. (2004). Codevelopment of externalizing and internalizing problems in early childhood Development and Psychopathology, 16, 313–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldsmith, H. H., Reilly, J., Lemery, K. S., Longley, S., & Prescott, A. (1993). Preliminary manual for the Preschool Laboratory Temperament Assessment Battery (version 1.0). Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, H.H., & Rothbart, M.K. (1999). Laboratory Temperament Assessment Battery, Prelocomotor version 3.1. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Grusec, J.E., & Goodnow, J.J. (1994). Impact of parental discipline methods on the child's internalization of values: A reconceptualization of the current points of view. Developmental Psychology, 30, 4–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hariri, A.R., Drabant, E.M., Munoz, K.E., Kolachana, B.S., Mattay, V.S., Egan, M.F., et al. (2005). A susceptibility gene for affective disorders and the response of the human amygdala. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 146–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harter, S. (1982). The Perceived Competence Scale for Children. Child Development, 53, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 924–936.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofer, M. A. (1994). Hidden regulators in attachment, separation, and loss. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2–3, Serial No. 240), 192–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, M. L. (1983). Affective and cognitive processes in moral internalization. In Higgins, E. T., Ruble, D., & Hartup, W. (Eds.), Social cognition and social development: A sociocultural perspective (pp. 236–274). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, C., Lahey, B. B., & Matthys, W. (2013). Editorial policy for candidate gene studies. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 511–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joosen, K. J., Mesman, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2012). Maternal sensitivity to infants in various settings predicts harsh discipline in toddlerhood. Attachment and Human Development, 14, 101–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, J., Yang, B. Z., Douglas-Palumberi, H., Crouse-Artus, M., Lipschitz, D., Krystal, J. H., et al. (2007). Genetic and environmental predictors of early alcohol use. Biological Psychiatry, 61, 1228–1234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerns, K. A., Aspelmeier, J. E., Gentzler, A. L., & Grabill, C. M. (2001). Parent–child attachment and monitoring in middle childhood. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerns, K. A., & Seibert, A. C. (in press). Finding your way through the thicket: Promising approaches to assessing attachment in middle childhood. In Waters, E., Vaughn, B., & Waters, H. (Eds.), Measuring attachment. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kiff, C. J., Lengua, L. J., & Zalewski, M. (2011). Nature and nurturing: Parenting in the context of child temperament. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 14, 251–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, S., & Kochanska, G. (2012). Child temperament moderates effects of parent–child mutuality on self-regulation: A relationship-based path for emotionally negative infants. Child Development, 83, 1275–1289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochanska, G., Aksan, N., & Nichols, K. E. (2003). Maternal power assertion in discipline and moral discourse contexts: Commonalities, differences, and implications for children's moral conduct and cognition. Developmental Psychology, 39, 949–963.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochanska, G., Aksan, N., Prisco, T. R., & Adams, E. E. (2008). Mother–child and father–child mutually responsive orientation in the first 2 years and children's outcomes at preschool age: Mechanisms of influence. Child Development, 79, 30–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochanska, G., & Kim, S. (2012). Toward a new understanding of legacy of early attachments for future antisocial trajectories: Evidence from two longitudinal studies. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 783–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochanska, G., & Kim, S. (2013). Difficult temperament moderates links between maternal responsiveness and children's compliance and behavior problems in low-income families. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 323–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochanska, G., & Kim, S. (2014). A complex interplay among the parent–child relationship, effortful control, and internalized, rule-compatible conduct in young children: Evidence from two studies. Developmental Psychology, 50, 8–21. doi:10.1037/a0032330CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochanska, G., Kim, S., Barry, R. A., & Philibert, R. A. (2011). Children's genotypes interact with maternal responsive care in predicting children's competence: Diathesis–stress or differential susceptibility? Development and Psychopathology, 23, 605–616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochanska, G., Kim, S., & Boldt, L. J. (2013). Origins of children's externalizing behavior problems in low-income families: Toddlers' willing stance toward their mothers as the missing link. Development and Psychopathology, 25, 891–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochanska, G., Koenig, J. L., Barry, R. A., Kim, S., & Yoon, J. E. (2010). Children's conscience during toddler and preschool years, moral self, and a competent, adaptive developmental trajectory. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1320–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, J. V., Nitz, K., Talwar, R., & Lerner, R. M. (1989). On the functional significance of temperamental individuality: A developmental contextual view of the concept of goodness of fit. In Kohnstamm, G. A., Bates, J. E., & Rothbart, M. K. (Eds.), Temperament in childhood (pp. 509–522). West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lesch, K. P. (2007). Linking emotion to the social brain: The role of the serotonin transporter in human social behaviour. Embo Reports, 8, S24–S29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesch, K.P., Bengel, D., Heils, A., Sabol, S. Z., Greenberg, B. D., Petri, S., et al. (1996). Association of anxiety-related traits with a polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region. Science, 274, 1527–1531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lipscomb, S. T., Leve, L. D., Harold, G. T., Neiderhiser, J. M., Shaw, D. S., Ge, X., et al. (2011). Trajectories of parenting and child negative emotionality during infancy and toddlerhood: A longitudinal analysis. Child Development, 82, 1661–1675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucki, I. (1998). The spectrum of behaviors influenced by serotonin. Biological Psychiatry, 44, 151–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manuck, S. B., & McCaffery, J. M. (2014). Gene–environment interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 41–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCord, J. (1997). On discipline. Psychological Inquiry, 8, 215–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesman, J., Stoel, R., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Juffer, F., Koot, H. M., et al. (2009). Predicting growth curves of early childhood externalizing problems: Differential susceptibility of children with difficult temperament. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 625–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nigg, J. T. (2006). Temperament and developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 395–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pardini, D. A. (2008). Novel insights into longstanding theories of bidirectional parent–child influences: Introduction to the special section. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 627–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pluess, M., & Belsky, J. (2010). Differential susceptibility to parenting and quality child care. Developmental Psychology, 46, 379–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pluess, M., & Belsky, J. (2013). Vantage sensitivity: Individual differences in response to positive experiences. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 901–916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Propper, C., & Moore, G. A. (2006). The influence of parenting on infant emotionality: A multilevel psychobiological perspective. Developmental Review, 26, 427–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roisman, G. I., Newman, D. A., Fraley, R. C., Haltigan, J. D., Groh, A. M., & Haydon, K. C. (2012). Distinguishing differential susceptibility from diathesis–stress: Recommendations for evaluating interaction effects. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 389–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothbart, M. K., & Bates, J. E. (2006). Temperament. In Damon, W. & Lerner, R. M. (Series Ed.) & Eisenberg, N. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 99–166). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Schore, A. N. (2001). Effects of a secure attachment relationship on right brain development, affect regulation, and infant mental health. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22, 7–66.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sourbrie, P. (1986). Reconciling the role of central serotonin neurons in human and animal behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinrad, T. L., & Stifter, C. A. (2006). Toddlers' empathy-related responding to distress: Predictions from negative emotionality and maternal behavior in infancy. Infancy, 10, 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sroufe, A. (1996). Emotional development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sroufe, L. A., Egeland, B., Carlson, E. A., & Collins, W. A. (2005). The development of the person: The Minnesota Study of Risk and Adaptation from Birth to Adulthood. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2000). Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Development, 71, 1072–1085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stright, A. D., Gallagher, K. C., & Kelley, K (2008). Infant temperament moderates relations between maternal parenting in early childhood and children's adjustment in first grade. Child Development, 79, 186–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suomi, S. J. (2006). Risk, resilience, and Gene × Environment interactions in rhesus monkeys. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1094, 52–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, A., & Chess, S. (1977). Temperament and development. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. A. (2006). The development of the person: Social understanding, relationships, conscience, self. In Damon, W. & Lerner, R. M. (Series Ed.) & Eisenberg, N. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 24–98). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. A. (in press). Conscience development in early childhood. In Killen, M. & Smetana, J. (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
van Goozen, S. H. M., Fairchild, G., Snoek, H., & Harold, G. T. (2007). The evidence for a neurobiological model of childhood antisocial behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 149–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Zeijl, J., Mesman, J., Stolk, M. N., Alink, R. A. L., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., et al. (2007). Differential susceptibility to discipline: The moderating effect of child temperament on the association between maternal discipline and early childhood externalizing problems. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 626–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed