Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:39:18.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From Interculturalism to Historicism: Reflections on Classical Indian Dance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Extract

At the MTV awards show in September 1998, Madonna performed a spiritual song in a transparent white T-shirt with three Indian Odissi dancers in their classical regalia. Within two days of this event a representative of a Hindu religious sect, the Vaisnavs, condemned Madonna for debasing Hinduism and Indian women. A significant intercultural event, which had been generating pride for some sections of the Indian-American community, had once again exposed the lack of context and historicity in interculturalism. Odissi is not merely an aesthetically pleasing dance form from eastern India; its history is embedded in various ancient fertility cults tied to ritualistic Hindu temple worship by women dancers known as “mahari(s).” The dance was also performed by young male dancers known as “gotipua(s),” who performed outside the temple. Frederique Marglin traces Odissi to the powerful cult of Chaitanya (a Vaisnavite saint reformer) in the sixteenth century (1985). She explains that, like many indigenous dance forms, it was simply called nacha before its revival in the 1950s by dance scholars and male teachers. Thus, the dance is a product of a complex mix of Hindu nationalism, regional chauvinism, and national revivalism and is embedded in patriarchal views of the role and function of women in society. Madonna's commercial interculturalism failed to take note of this: By trying to glamorize an exotic tradition she, unsurprisingly, offended the self-appointed bearers of that tradition.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Ahmad, Aijaz. 1992. In Theory: Classes, Nation, Literature. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Allen, M.H. 1997. “Rewriting the Script for South Indian Dance.” The Drama Review 41: 63100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bagchi, Jasodhara. 1990. “Representing Nationalism: Ideology of Motherhood in Colonial Bengal.” Economic and Political Weekly 25: WS6571.Google Scholar
Bharucha, Rustom. 1990. Theatre and the World: Essays on Performance and Politics of Culture. Columbia, MO: South Asia Publications.Google Scholar
Bharucha, Rustom. 1997. Chandralekha. New Delhi: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Chaki-Sirkar, Manjushree. 1993. “New Directions in Indian Dance.” In The Statesman: Festival. Edited by Irani, J.Calcutta: The Statesman.Google Scholar
Chaki-Sirkar, Manjushree. 1994. “The Emergence of Dance Culture in Bengal.” In Images and Perspectives. Edited by Roy, S. and Ghosal, S.Calcutta: Nariseva Sangha and Engage Publishers.Google Scholar
Chakravorty, Pallabi. 1998. “Dance Hegemony and Nation: The Construction of Classical Indian Dance.” South Asia 21: 107120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakravorty, Pallabi. 2000. “Choreographing Modernity: Kathak Dance, Public Culture, and Women's Identity in India.” Ph.D. dissertation, Temple University.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha. 1986. Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World. The United Nations University. London: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha. 1989. “Colonialism, Nationalism and Colonized Woman: The Context in India.” American Ethnologist 16: 622–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha. 1997. The Nation and its Fragments. Calcutta: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, Indira. 1998. The Frail Hero and Virile History. Calcutta: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coomaraswamy, Ananda K. 1957. The Dance of Shiva. Rev. ed. New York: The Noonday Press.Google Scholar
Coorlawala, Uttara A. 1992. “Ruth St. Denis and India's Dance Renaissance.” Dance Chronicle 15: 123148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coorlawala, Uttara A. 1994. “Classical and Contemporary Indian Dance: Overview, Criteria and Choreographic Analysis.” Ph. D. dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
Coorlawala, Uttara A. 1996. “The Birth of Bharatanatyam and the Sanskritized Body.” CORD Conference Proceedings.Google Scholar
Erdman, Joan. 1996. “Dance Discourses: Rethinking the History of the ‘Oriental Dance.’” In Moving Words: Re-writing Dance. Edited by Morris, Gay. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Giurchesu, Anca. 1990. “The Use of Traditional Symbols for Recasting the Present: A Case Study of Tourism in Rumania.” Dance Studies 14: 4764.Google Scholar
Giurchesu, Anca, and Torp, Lisbet. 1991. “Theory and Method in Dance Research: A European Approach to the Holistic Study of Dance.” In Year Book for Traditional Music 23: 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grau, Andrée. 1992. “Intercultural Research in the Performing Arts.” In Dance Research 10: 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyer, Alessandra. 1997. “South Asian Dance: The Traditional/Classical Idioms.” In Choreography and Dance: South Asian Dance. Edited by Iyer, A.Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Jeyasingh, Shobana. 1995. “Imaginary Homelands: Creating a New Dance Language.” In Border Tensions: Dance Discourse. Proceedings of the Fifth Study of Dance Conference. Guildford: University of Surrey.Google Scholar
Jeyasingh, Shobana. 1997. “Text Context Dance.” In Choreography and Dance: South Asian Dance. Edited by Iyer, A.Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publisher.Google Scholar
Jowitt, Deborah. 1988. Time and the Dancing Image. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Kaviraj, Sudipta. 1994. “On Construction of Colonial Power: Structure, Discourse, Hegemony.” In Contesting Colonial Hegemony. Edited by Engles, Dagmar and Marks, Shula. London: British Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kersenboom-Story, Saskia. 1987. Nityasumangali: Devadasi Tradition in South India. New Delhi: Motilal Banarasidass.Google Scholar
Khokar, Mohan. 1997a. “Devadasi-s in Tights and Ballet Slippers, What?” In Sruti 154 (July): 2126.Google Scholar
Khokar, Mohan. 1997b. “Male Dance in America: The Original Catalyst.” In Sruti 150 (March): 1925.Google Scholar
Lakhia, Kumudini. 1995. Nritya Parva. Ahmedabad: Abhigam.Google Scholar
Marglin, Frederique A. 1985. Wives of the God-King. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marranca, Bonnie, Robinson, Marc, and Chaudhuri, Una. 1991. “Criticism, Culture, and Performance: An Interview with Edward Said.” In Interculturalism and Performance. Edited by Marranca, Bonnie and Dasgupta, Gautam. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meduri, Avanthi. 1996. “Nation, Woman Representation: The Sutured History of the Devadasi and Her Dance.” Ph.D. dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
O'shea, Janet. 1998. “Traditional Indian Dance and the Making of Interpretive Communities.” Asian Theatre Journal 15, no. 1 (spring): 4563.Google Scholar
Ransom, Josephine. 1938. A Short History of the Theosophical Society. Madras.Google Scholar
Said, Edward. 1987. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Sirkar, Ranjabati. 1997. “Contemporary Indian Dance.” In Rasa. Edited by Mukherjee, Bimal and Kothari, Sunil. Calcutta: Anamika Kalasangam.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, Amrit. 1984. “Temple Prostitution and Reform: An Examination of the Ethnographic, Historical and Textual Content of the Devadasis of Tamilnadu, South India.” Ph.D. dissertation, Wolfson College.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, Amrit. 1985. “Reform and Revival: The Devadasi and Her Dance.” Economic and Political Weekly 20, no. 44 (November): 1869–76.Google Scholar
Tharu, Susie, and Lalita, K., eds. 1991. Women Writing In India, 600 B.C. to the Present. New York: The Feminist Press at the City University of New York.Google Scholar
Turner, Jane. 1995. “Control of the Passes, De-scribing the Fictions of Bali.” In Border Tensions: Dance Discourse. Proceedings of the Fifth Study of Dance Conference. Guildford: University of Surrey.Google Scholar
Vatsyayan, Kapila. 1982. Dance in Indian Painting. New Delhi: Abhinav Publications.Google Scholar
Vatsyayan, Kapila. 1989. “Dance Scholarship: The Complex Indian Situation.” In Beyond Performance: Dance Scholarship Today. Edited by Au, S. and Peter, F.Berlin: Centre of the International Theatre Institute.Google Scholar
Vatsyayan, Kapila. 1995. “The Future of Dance Scholarship in India.” Dance Chronicle 18: 485–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkataraman, Lila. 1990. “Lets Get Physical.” The Telegraph (Calcutta). August.Google Scholar