Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T12:07:58.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bodily Knowledge: Epistemological Reflections on Dance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Jaana Parviainen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article is concerned with epistemological questions of dance, specifically, the nature of dance knowledge. The aim is to address the role of our bodily activity and the tactile-kinaesthetic sense in epistemology and to clarify the concept “bodily knowledge”—knowing in and through the body. I start with reflection on the standpoints of traditional epistemology and a feminist critique of it, then, extending the concern with epistemological inquiry of dance knowledge, explore Sondra Fraleigh's and Maxine Sheets-Johnstone's notions of cognitive capacities of the moving body. Finally, setting out from the groundwork of Edmund Husserl's, Edith Stein's, and Maurice Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology of the body, I use some key concepts from Michael Polanyi's epistemology to describe the nature of bodily knowledge. The argument is that there is a distinction and a connection between “skill” and “knowledge” in respect to the body's movement. Gilbert Ryle's “know how” implies abilities ranging from bodily skills to abstract contemplative cases, but it cannot explain “know how” in the absence of skill. Thus, the rationale underlying this discussion can be put more clearly by asking why dance teachers are able to teach dance students movements they can no longer execute themselves.

Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , Summer 2002 , pp. 11 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Balzer, Carmen. 1991. “Empathy Problem in Edith Stein.” Analecta Husserliana, 35: 271–278.Google Scholar
Barbiero, D. 1999. Dictionary of Philosophy of Mind—Tacit Knowledge. http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~philos/MindDict/tacitknowlede.html.Google Scholar
Bell, David. 1990. Husserl. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans, by Nice, Richard. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Casey, Edward S. 1996. “The Ghost of Embodiment: Is the Body a Natural or a Cultural Entity?” In The Corporated Self. Edited by O'Donovan-Anderson, Michael, 23–43. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Crowley, Helen and Himmelweit, Susan, eds. 1992. Knowing Woman: Feminism and Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan. 1985. An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dastur, Françoise. 1984. “Consciousness and Body in the Phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty.” Analecta Husserliana, 17: 117–125.Google Scholar
Duran, Jane. 1994. Knowledge in Context: Naturalized Epistemology and Sociolinguistics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Flax, Jane. 1983. “Political Philosophy and Patriarchal Unconscious: A Psychoanalytic Perspective on Epistemology and Metaphysics.” In Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Edited by Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merrill B., 245–282. Dordecht (Holland) and Boston: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Foster, Susan. 1997. “Dancing Bodies.” In Meaning in Motion. Edited by Desmond, Jane C., 235–257. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Fraleigh, Sondra. 1987. Dance and the Lived Body. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Fraleigh, Sondra. 1993. “Good Intentions and Dancing Moments: Agency, Freedom, and Self-knowledge in Dance.” In The Perceived Self. Edited by Neisser, Ulric, 102–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fraleigh, Sondra. 1999. “Family Resemblance.” In Researching Dance. Edited by Fraleigh, Sondra and Hanstein, Penelope, 3–21. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Martha. 1993. Blood Memory. London: Sceptre.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1960. Cartesian Meditation: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Trans. Cairns, Dorion. The Hague: Martinus Nijoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology (Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie: Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie, 1954). Trans, by Carr, David. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Krogh, Georg von and Roos, Johan. 1995. Organizational Epistemology. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Lazreg, Marnia. 1991. “Women's Experience and Feminist Epistemology: A Critical Neo-Rationalist Approach.” In Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Epistemology. Edited by Lennon, Kathleen and Whitford, Margaret, 45–94. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lennon, Kathleen and Whitford, Margaret, eds. 1991. Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Epistemology. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanual. 1969. Totality and Infinity. Trans, by Lingis, A.. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Biddy. 1992. “Feminism, Criticism and Foucault.” In Knowing Woman: Feminism and Knowledge. Edited by Crowley, Helen and Himmelweit, Susan, 275–286. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Randy. 1998. Critical Moves: Dance Studies in Theory and Politics. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. The Phenomenology of Perception (Phénoménologie de la perception, 1945). Trans, by Smith, Colin. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1968. The Visible and the Invisible (Le visible et l'invisible, 1964). Edited by Lefort, Claude. Trans. Lingis, Alphonso. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Moser, Paul K., ed. 1986. Empirical Knowledge: Readings in Contemporary Epistemology. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
Neisser, Ulric. 1988. “Five Kinds of Self-knowledge.” Philosophical Psychology 1: 35–59.Google Scholar
O'Donovan-Anderson, Michael. 1997. Content and Comportment: On Embodiment and the Epistemic Availability of the World. Lanham (MD), Boulder (CO), New York, London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Parviainen, Jaana. 1998. Bodies Moving and Moved: A Phenomenological Analysis of the Dancing Subject and the Cognitive and Ethical Values of Dance Art. Tampere, Finland: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. New York: Doubleday & Company.Google Scholar
Pollock, John L. 1986. Contemporary Theories of Knowledge. Totowa, NJ: Rowan & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Puddefoot, John C. 1996. Language and Education; Mind and Body. http://www.users.dircon.co.uk/~pudepied/Pol2.htm.Google Scholar
Reimer, Bennett. 1992. “What Knowledge Is of Most Worth in the Arts?” In The Arts, Education, and Aesthetic Knowing. Edited by Reimer, Bennett and Smith, Ralph A., 20–50. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. 1984 (1949). The Concept of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, Andy F. 1988. Michael Polanyi's Post-Critical Epistemology: A Reconstruction of Some Aspects of ‘Tacit Knowing’. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Sartori, Diana. 1991. “Women's Authority in Science.” Knowing the Difference: Feminist Perspectives in Epistemology, 110–121. Edited by Lennon, Kathleen and Whitford, Margaret. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Richard. 1970. “On Knowing One's Own Body.” Analecta Husserliana, 1: 152–169.Google Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine. 1999. The Primacy of Movement. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Stein, Edith. 1989. On the Problem of Empathy (Zum Problem der Einfühlung, 1917). Trans, by Stein, Waltraut. Washington, DC: ICS Publication.Google Scholar
Sveiby, Karl E. 1997. Tacit Knowledge, http://203.32.10.69/polanyi.html.Google Scholar
Tiemersma, Douwe. 1989. Body Schema and Body Image: An Interdisciplinary and Philosophical Study. Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Turner, Stephen. 1994. The Social Theory of Practices: Tradition, Tacit Knowledge and Presuppositions. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, Gail. 1999. Body Images: Embodiment as Intercorporeality. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar