Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T22:35:21.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Evolution of Social Darwinism in China, 1895–1930

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2022

Xiaoxing Jin
Xiaoxing Jin*
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates the development of social Darwinism in China from the mid-1890s to 1930 vis-à-vis its ties with social Darwinism in the West, employing a comparative analysis of Spencer, Huxley, and Yan Fu. A form of evolutionism that envisioned a cosmological order based upon strength was transformed into a component of power politics in Republican China, despite unsuccessful political endeavors that illustrated both the triumphs and social malfunctions of evolutionary ideas. From the late 1910s, a new variety of social Darwinism arose alongside the scientific one, reflecting the influence of Kropotkin and de Vries, as Chinese thinkers incorporated non-Anglophone texts. The theories that emerged made sense of the changing Chinese adaptations of evolutionary thinking by contextualizing and modifying them within the intellectual and political dynamics inside China and also in China’s evolving relationship with capitalism and imperialism.

Keywords

social DarwinismChinaSpencerHuxleyYan FuDarwinevolutionPyotr KropotkinHugo de Vries
Type
Spiritual Wares, Retro Kitsch, and Theoretical Things
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , July 2022 , pp. 690 - 721
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Acknowledgments: For their invaluable feedback and support, I thank Janet Browne, Phillip Sloan, Felipe Fernández-Armesto, Bernard Lightman, Thomas Stapleford, Daqing Zhang, Haiyan Yang, Guosheng Wu, Geneviève Zubrzycki, Paul Christopher Johnson, and David Akin. CSSH’s anonymous referees were particularly helpful. For securing copies of the old, rare materials, I thank the librarians at Harvard University, the University of Notre Dame, the University of Chicago, the Australian National University, and the Peking University Library.

References

1 Hawkins, Mike, Social Darwinism in European and American Thought, 1860–1945: Nature as Model and Nature as Threat (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Richards, Robert J., Was Hitler a Darwinian? Disputed Questions in the History of Evolutionary Theory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schröder, Wiebke, Meanings of Social Darwinism (Munich: Grin Publishing, 2013)Google Scholar; Moore, James, “Socializing Darwinism: Historiography and the Fortunes of a Phrase,” Radical Science 20 (1986): 38–80 Google Scholar; Ruse, Michael, “Social Darwinism: The Two Sources,” Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies 12, 1 (1980): 23–36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bellomy, Donald, “‘Social Darwinism’ Revisited,” Perspectives in American History 1 (1984): 1–129 Google Scholar. Researchers are also deliberately pushing beyond these horizons to look at social Darwinism in Northern and Southern Europe, Latin America, the Arab world, Russia, Japan, and Korea. See Glick, Thomas F., Puig-Samper, Miguel Angel, and Ruiz, Rosaura, eds., The Reception of Darwinism in the Iberian World: Spain, Spanish America and Brazil (Berlin: Springer, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Elshakry, Marwa, Reading Darwin in Arabic, 1860–1950 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Glick, Thomas F. and Shaffer, Elinor, eds., The Literary and Cultural Reception of Charles Darwin in Europe (New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014)Google Scholar; Zarimis, Maria, Darwin’s Footprint: Cultural Perspectives on Evolution in Greece (1880–1930s) (Budapest: Central European University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tikhonov, Vladimir, Social Darwinism and Nationalism in Korea: The Beginnings, 1880s–1910s: Survival as an Ideology of Korean Modernity (Leiden: Brill, 2010)Google Scholar; Godart, Clinton, Darwin, Dharma, and the Divine: Evolutionary Theory and Religion in Modern Japan (Honolulu: University of Hawai`i Press, 2018)Google Scholar; Lightman, Bernard, ed., Global Spencerism: The Communication and Appropriation of a British Evolutionist (Leiden: Brill, 2015)Google Scholar.

2 Schwartz, Benjamin, In Search of Wealth and Power: Yen Fu and the West (Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Pusey, James Reeve, China and Charles Darwin (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983)Google Scholar.

4 Huang, Max Ko-Wu, The Meaning of Freedom: Yan Fu and the Origins of Chinese Liberalism (Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, 2008)Google Scholar.

5 Xu, Jilin, “Social Darwinism in Modern China,” Journal of Modern Chinese History 6, 2 (2012): 182–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Ibid., 182.

7 Moore, “Socializing Darwinism,” 38.

8 Hofstadter, Richard, Social Darwinism in American Thought (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1944), 19 Google Scholar.

9 Spencer, Herbert, Social Statics (London: John Chapman, 1851), 80, 84 Google Scholar; Sharma, Rajendra Kumar, Social Change and Social Control (New Deli: Atlantic, 1997), 34 Google Scholar.

10 Herbert Spencer, Seven Essays, Selected from the Works of H. Spencer (London: Watts & Co., 1907), 7.

11 Spencer, Social Statics, 323.

12 Herbert Spencer letter to Edward Lott, 10 Feb. 1860, in David Duncan, ed., Life and Letters of Herbert Spencer (London: Methuen & Co. 1908), 98.

13 Spencer, Herbert, The Principles of Biology (New York: Appleton, 1904[1864]), 530 Google Scholar.

14 Spencer, Herbert, The Study of Sociology (New York: Appleton, 1875), 353 Google Scholar.

15 Barton, Ruth, The X Club: Power and Authority in Victorian Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018), 1–35 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Francis, Mark, Herbert Spencer and the Invention of Modern Life (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2007), 146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Himmelfarb, Gertrude, “Evolution and Ethics, Revisited,” New Atlantis 42 (2014), 81–87, 83Google Scholar; Thomas Huxley, More Criticisms on Darwin, and Administrative Nihilism (New York: Appleton, 1872), 79.

17 Richards, Robert, Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989), 314 Google Scholar.

18 Lightman, Bernard, “Huxley and Scientific Agnosticism,” in Bernard Lightman, Evolutionary Naturalism in Victorian Britain: The ‘Darwinians’ and Their Critics (Farnham: Ashgate, 2009), 287 Google Scholar.

19 Himmelfarb, “Evolution and Ethics,” 83.

20 Huxley, Thomas, Evolution and Ethics and Other Essays (London: Macmillan, 1894), 70–145 Google Scholar; Himmelfarb, “Evolution and Ethics,” 83–85.

21 Sun Yingxiang, Yan Fu Nianpu [The chronology of Yan Fu] (Fuzhou: Fujian People’s Publishing House, 2003), 26–29; Elman, Benjamin A., On Their Own Terms: Science in China, 1550–1900 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005), 372–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Huxley, Evolution and Ethics, 4.

23 Fu, Yan, Tianyan Lun (Mianyang: Shenshiji Zhai Press, 1898), vol. 1, 2–3 Google Scholar.

24 Letter from T. H. Huxley to W. Platt Ball, 27 Oct. 1890, in Leonard Huxley, ed., Life and Letters of Thomas Huxley (London: Macmillan, 1900), vol. 2, 268.

25 Yan Fu, Tianyan Lun, vol. 2, 50.

26 Ibid. vol. 1, 39.

27 Ibid., 40–41.

28 Ibid.

29 Ibid., 36.

30 Wang Shi ed., Yan Fu Ji [Collected essays of Yan Fu] (Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 1986), 1082.

31 Desmond, Adrian, Huxley: From Devil’s Disciple to Evolution’s High Priest (New York: Basic Books, 1997), 597–98Google Scholar.

32 Huxley, Evolution and Ethics, 81–82.

33 Yan Fu, Tianyan Lun, vol. 2, 51–53.

34 Ibid., 53–54.

35 Schwartz, In Search of Wealth and Power, 111.

36 Yan Fu, Tianyan Lun, vol. 1, 34–35.

37 Yang Shen, “Social Darwinism or National Darwinism,” Philosophical Researches 1 (2014): 70–75 Google Scholar.

38 Schwartz, In Search of Wealth and Power, 98–101.

39 A very few nations, including China’s neighbors Japan and Korea, introduced social Darwinism through the translation of Huxley’s anti-social Darwinist essay. In Korea, Spencer and Darwin were introduced during the 1880s. Huxley was also introduced, with attention being paid to his physiological works, such as: Huxley, Thomas H. and Youmans, William J., The Elements of Physiology and Hygiene: A Textbook for Educational Institutions (New York: D. Appleton & Co., 1884)Google Scholar. See Tikhonov, Social Darwinism, 25. Social Darwinism was introduced to Japan through a translation of Spencer’s works during the Meiji period. See Godart, Darwin, Dharma, and the Divine, 243.

40 Cao Juren, Zhong guo xueshu sixiang suibi [Essays on the Chinese history of academic thinking] (Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2003), 112.

41 Rebecca E. Karl and Peter Zarrow, eds., Rethinking the 1898 Reform Period: Political and Cultural Change in Late Qing China (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002), 115–20; To, Lee Lai and Guan, Lee Hock, eds., , Sun Yat-Sen, Nanyang, , and the 1911 Revolution (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2011), 165–204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Yunzhi, Geng, An Introductory Study on China’s Cultural Transformation in Recent Times (Berlin: Springer, 2015), 303–6Google Scholar.

42 Zuoyue Wang, “Saving China through Science: The Science Society of China, Scientific Nationalism, and Civil Society in Republican China,” Osiris 2d series, 17 (2002): 291–332; Buck, Peter, American Science and Modern China, 1876–1936 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), ch. 4Google Scholar; Xiaoxing Jin, “The Evolution of Evolutionism in China, 1870–1930,” Isis 111, 1 (2020): 46–66, 55–56.

43 Yan Fu, Tianyan Lun, vol. 1, 3.

44 Jin, Xiaoxing, “Translation and Transmutation: The Origin of Species in China,” British Journal for the History of Science 52, 1 (2019): 117–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

45 Ospovat, Dov, The Development of Darwin’s Theory: Natural History, Natural Theology, and Natural Selection, 1838–1859 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 218–28Google Scholar.

46 Darwin, Charles, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (London: John Murray, 1872), 99 Google Scholar.

47 Junwu, Ma, Daerwen wuzhong youlai (Shanghai: Wenming Shuju and Guangyi Shuju, 1906), 145 Google Scholar.

48 Karl, Rebecca E. and Zarrow, Peter, eds., Rethinking the 1898 Reform Period: Political and Cultural Change in Late Qing China (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 Kang Youwei, Datong Shu (Shanghai: Zhonghua Book Company, 1935); Wang Fanseng, Gushi bian yundong de xingqi [The rise of the anti-ancient worship movement] (Taipei: Wangda Shuwei Press), ch. 2; Pusey, China and Charles Darwin, ch. 1.

50 Grasso, June, Corrin, Jay P., and Kort, Michael, Modernization and Revolution in China (Armonk: Sharpe, 2015), 54 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Youwei, Kang, Wuzhi jiuguo lun (Shanghai: Cheung Hing Book Co., 1919[1905]), 2–3 Google Scholar.

52 Ibid.

53 Chang, Hao, Liang Chi-chao and Intellectual Transition in China, 1890–1907 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971)Google Scholar.

54 Liang Qichao, Yu Youling xiansheng shu (Letter to Mr. Yan Fu), quoted in Shen Yongbao and Cai Xingshui, eds., Jinhualun de yingxiangli—Daerwen zai zhongguo [The influence of evolution—Darwin in China] (Nanchang: Jiangxi Universities and Colleges Publishing House, 2009), 143–45.

55 Hsu, Cho-yun, China: A New Cultural History, Michael Duke and Timothy Baker, trans. (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012), 547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jin, “Translation and Transmutation,” 126.

56 Qichao, Liang, “Jinhualun geminzhe jiede zhi xueshuo [Theories developed by evolutionist Benjamin Kidd],” Sein Min Choong Bou 18 (16 October 1902): 3 Google Scholar.

57 Qichao, Liang, “Lun Jinbu [On progress],” Sein Min Choong Bou 10 (20 June 1902): 2–3 Google Scholar.

58 Pusey, China and Charles Darwin, 154.

59 Michael D. K. Ing, The Vulnerability of Integrity in Early Confucian Thought (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), “Conclusion”; Qingsong Shen and Kwong-loi Sun, eds., Confucian Ethics in Retrospect and Prospect (Washington, D.C.: Council for Research in Values & Philosophy, 2007), chs. 1, 4, 5, and 7; Liu, Xiusheng, Mencius, Hume and the Foundation of Ethics (Abingdon: Routledge, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 47; James Sellmann, “Confucian Ethics,” in Qiang Zha, ed., Education in China: Educational History, Models, and Initiatives (Great Barrington: Berkshire, 2013), 12–14.

60 Kam-por Yu, Julia Tao, and Philip J. Ivanhoe, eds., Taking Confucian Ethics Seriously: Contemporary Theory and Applications (Albany: SUNY Press, 2010), 64; Xu, “Social Darwinism,” 183–87.

61 Liang Qichao, “Lun Qiangquan,” Qing Yi Bao 31 (1899): 4.

62 Hu Shi, “Wenxue Jinhua guannian yu xijugailiang [The concept of literature evolution and the improvement of drama],” La Jeunesse 5, 4 (15 Oct. 1918): 320; Xu, “Social Darwinism in Modern China,” 190.

63 Zhang Taiyan, Gegu Dingxin de Zheli: Zhang Taiyan Wenxuan, Jiang Bin, ed. (Shanghai: Far East Press,· 1996), 145.

64 Taiyan, Zhang, “Zu Zhi (Clans’ Policy),” The Essays of Zhang Taiyan (Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Press, 1984), vol. 3, 46–48 Google Scholar.

65 Quoted from Julia Schneider, Zhang Taiyan: The Republic of China as an Image (Leiden: Brill, 2017), 144 Google Scholar.

66 Julia Schneider, Nation and Ethnicity (Leiden: Brill, 2017), 198–99Google Scholar.

67 Zhongmao, Wang and Zhanjun, Hu, “On ‘Anti-Manchu’ in Late Qing,” Journal of Zhengzhou University 4 (1994): 23–28, 25Google Scholar.

68 Yang Du, “Jin Tie zhuyi shuo,” Yang Du Ji (Changsha: Hunan People’s Press, 1986), 213–397; Xu, “Social Darwinism,” 185. On utilitarianism in Chinese philosophy, see Zhang, Qianfan, Human Dignity in Classical Chinese Philosophy (Berlin: Springer, 2016), 147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

69 Chen, Yuan-tsung, Return to the Middle Kingdom: One Family, Three Revolutionaries, and the Birth of Modern China (New York: Union Square Press, 2008), 51–52 Google Scholar; Spence, Jonathan D., The Search for Modern China (New York: Norton, 2013), 271–72Google Scholar.

70 Rulun, Zhang, Sixiang de Zongji (Jinan, China: Shandong Friendship Press, 2006), 17–26 Google Scholar; Dahua, Zheng and Xiaozhan, Zou, eds., Xifang Sixiang zai Jindai Zhongguo (Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2005), 144–193 Google Scholar.

71 Dahua, Zheng, Minguo Sixiangshi Lun (Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2005), 115–62Google Scholar.

72 Quoted in Pusey, China and Charles Darwin, 439.

73 Ibid.; Pi Houfeng, Yan Fu Pingzhuan [Yan’s biography and reviews] (Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 2006), 139.

74 Du Yaquan, “Jingshen jiuguo lun,” Du Yaquan Wencun (Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press, 2003), 3.

75 Sloan, Phillip R., “Darwin, Vital Matter, and the Transformation of Species,” Journal of the History of Biology 16 (1986): 369–445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. In the Descent he certainly speaks favorably of known “materialists,” such as Vogt, Buchner. In one passage in Notebook C Darwin does call himself a materialist, but he generally did not. See Barrett, Paul H. et al., eds., Charles Darwin’s Notebooks, 1836–1844: Geology, Transmutation of Species, Metaphysical Enquiries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), 291 Google Scholar.

76 Offer, John, ed., Herbert Spencer: Critical Assessments, vol. 1 (London: Routledge, 2000), 70 Google Scholar.

77 Du, “Jingshen,” 54.

78 Du Yaquan, “Jingshen jiuguo lun,” 35.

79 Tianyan, Zhang, “Yuan Bian [In search of transformation],” Qiu Shu (Beijing: Blossom Press, 2017), 104 Google Scholar.

80 Hongming, Gu, “Zhongguo niujing yundong gushi,” Gu Hongming wenji (Haikou: Hainan Press, 1996), 321 Google Scholar.

81 Yat-sen, Sun, “ Minbao fakanci [The opening statement of People’s Journal ]),” Minbao 1 (20 Oct. 1905): 1–2 Google Scholar.

82 Yat-sen, Sun, “The Principles of Building Our Country,” in Yongbao, Shen and Xingshui, Cai, eds., [The influence of evolution—Darwin in China] (Nanchang: Jiangxi Universities and Colleges Publishing House, 2009), 105 Google Scholar.

83 Jin, “Evolution of Evolutionism in China, 1870–1930,” 55–66.

84 Kropotkin, Pyotr, Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution (New York: McClure, Phillips & Company, 1902), 293 Google Scholar.

85 Paul, Diane, “Darwin, Social Darwinism and Eugenics,” in Hodge, Jonathan and Radick, Gregory, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Darwin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 223–25Google Scholar.

86 Langbo, Wu, “The Spread of Mutual Aid at the End of Qing Dynasty,” Academic Journal of Zhongzhou 146, 2 (2005): 154–57, 155Google Scholar.

87 Pyotr Kropotkin, “Huzhu (Mutual Aid),” Li Shizeng, trans., Xin Shiji (La Nova Tempo) 31 (25 Jan. 1908) and 32 (1 Feb. 1908). La Novaj Tempoj was Chinese weekly published in Paris.

88 Pyotr Kropotkin, “Huzhu Lun [The theory of mutual aid],” Li Shizeng, trans., Eastern Miscellany 16, 5–10 (1919).

89 Shizeng, Li, “Huzhu Lun,” Eastern Miscellany 16: 5 (1919): 87–94, 88.Google Scholar

90 Cai Yuanpei, “To Chen Duxiu,” La jeunesse 3, 1 (1917): n.p.

91 See Bonavia, David, China’s Warlords (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

92 Qingsong, Bi, “On the Spread and Impact of Mutual Aid in Modern China,” Border Economy and Culture 157, 1 (2017): 41–43, 41Google Scholar.

93 Yoshihiro Ishikawa, The Formation of the Chinese Communist Party (New York: Columbia University Press, 2013), 384–99; Lawrence R. Sullivan, Leadership and Authority in China¸1895–1976 (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2012), chs. 2 and 3; Luk, Michael Y. L., The Origins of Chinese Bolshevism: An Idea in the Making, 1920–1928 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar.

94 Daiying, Yun, “The First Year of the Mutual Aid League,” in Yunhou, Zhang et al., eds., Wushi Shiqi de Shetuan (Beijing: Joint Publishing, 1979)Google Scholar.

95 Yuanpei, Cai, “Chinese Philosophy in the Past Fifty Years,” in Selected Essays of Cai Yuanpei (Bejing: Zhonghua Book Company, 1959)Google Scholar. Other anarchist organizations included Jinhua She ([Kropotkinian] Evolution League), and Gongdu Huzhu Tuan [Labor-study, mutual group]. See Bi Qingsong, “On the Spread,” 42.

96 van de Ven, Hans J., From Friend to Comrade: The Founding of the Chinese Communist Party, 1920–1927 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992), 26–30 Google Scholar.

97 Li Dazhao, “Wo de Makesi Zhuyi Guan [My Marxist View],” La jeunesse 6, 5 (1919): 521–37, esp. 531–32, 536.

98 Herbert Spencer, Social Statics (New York: Appleton, 1899), 65–68; Lightman, Bernard, “Spencer’s British Disciplines,” in Francis, Mark and Taylor, Michael W., eds., Herbert Spencer: Legacies (Abingdon: Routledge, 2014), 222–43Google Scholar.

99 Dixon, Thomas, The Invention of Altruism: Making Moral Meanings in Victorian Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), 243, 371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

100 Li, “My Marxist View,” 536.

101 Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, Wangdao, Chen, trans. xuanyan, Gongchandang [The Communist Manifesto] (Shanghai: Shanghai shehuizhuyi yanjiushe [Shanghai Socialism Studies Society], 1920), 2 Google Scholar.

102 The Chinese translator of The Origin of Species, Ma Junwu, published a series of articles on socialism in 1903. One of them, “The Comparison between Socialism and Evolutionism,” introduced a series of socialist philosophers. See Junwu, Ma, “Shehui zhuyi yu jinhualun zhi bijiao [The comparison between socialism and evolutionism],” Yishu huibian [The compilation of translated works] 2, 11 (1903), 87 Google Scholar.

103 Barnouin, Barbara and Changgen, Yu, Zhou Enlai (Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong Press, 2006), 14 Google Scholar.

104 Qu Qiubai, “Duiyu jiejidouzheng de taolun [The discussion on class struggles]—Another Response to Mr. Mingzhi,” Weekly Journal 146 (3 Feb. 1926): 1355–58, 1356.

105 Levenson, Joseph, Confucian China and Its Modern Fate: A Trilogy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968), 134–40Google Scholar; Joseph Levenson, Revolution and Cosmopolitanism: The Western Stage and the Chinese Stages (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2018[1971]), 48.

106 Bowler, Peter, The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades around 1900 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992), ch. 8Google Scholar. The concept of “mutation” was clearly incorporated into the new synthesis, but at a micro, “gene level” as the source of evolutionary novelty.

107 Chongshu, Qian, “Tianyan xinyi,” Kexue 1, 7 (1915): 781–82Google Scholar.

108 De Vries’s mutation theory included seven fundamental assumptions: new elementary species arise suddenly, without transitional forms (Hugo de Vries, Mutation Theory: Volume 1 [Chicago: Open Court Publishing, 1909], 248). New elementary species are, as a rule, absolutely constant from the moment that they arise (ibid., 249). Most of the new forms that have appeared are elementary species, and not varieties in the strict sense of the term (ibid., 251). New elementary species appear in large numbers at the same time or at any rate during the same period (ibid., 253). The new characteristics have nothing to do with individual variability (ibid., 254). The mutations, to which the origin of new elementary species is due, appear to be indefinite; that is to say, the changes may affect all organs and seem to take place in almost every conceivable direction (ibid., 255), and mutability appears periodically (ibid., 258).

109 Bowler, Eclipse of Darwinism, 183.

110 Jin, “Evolution of Evolutionism in China,” 55–59.

111 Engels, F., Socialism: Utopian and Scientific (Chicago: S. Sonnenschein, 1892[1880]), 18–19 Google Scholar.

112 Chen Duxiu, “Zichanjieji de gemin yu gemin de zichanjieji [The bourgeoisie revolution and the revolutionary bourgeoisie),” Xiangdao [Weekly review] 22 (25 Apr. 1923): 162–64, 162.

113 Shen Ji, Chen Duxiu Research, vol. 2 (Hefei: Anhui University Press, 2003), 81.

114 Jianshu, Ren et al. eds., Chen Duxiu Zhuzuo Xuan (Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Press, 1993), 497 Google Scholar.

115 Linke, Uli, “Folklore and the Government of Social Life,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 32, 1 (1990): 117–48. 143CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

116 O’Shaughnessy, Nicholas, Selling Hitler: Propaganda and the Nazi Brand (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 161 Google Scholar; Daniel J. Kevles, In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995).

117 Otsubo, Sumiko and Bartholomew, James, “Eugenics in Japan: Some Ironies of Modernity, 1883–1945,” Science in Context 11, 3–4 (1998): 545–65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

118 Hofstadter, Social Darwinism in American Thought; Hawkins, Social Darwinism in European and American Thought; A. P. Thakur, The Legacy of Social Darwinism (Delhi: Global Vision Publishing House, 2005).

119 Hawkins, Social Darwinism, 35.