Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:13:06.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring Marriage by Estate and Class: A Debate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Patricia Seed ,
Philip F. Rust ,
Robert Mccaa  and
Stuart B. Schwartz
Patricia Seed
Affiliation:
Rice University and Medical University of South Carolina
Philip F. Rust
Affiliation:
Rice University and Medical University of South Carolina
Robert Mccaa
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Stuart B. Schwartz
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The debate over estate and class continues to be one of the more enduring in colonial Latin American history. At its core lies an argument, much older than the terms estate and class, about the degree of rigidity of the colonial social structure. Evidence of this older concern can be found in the writings of Sergio Bagú (1952) and Gonzalo Aguirre Beltrán (1946) among others. The formulation of the debate into more precise sociological terms originated with the publication of an article in 1963 by Lyle McAlister in the Hispanic American Historical Review entitled “Social Structure and Social Change in Colonial New Spain.” In that article McAlister characterized the social structure of Latin America on the eve of independence as shifting from inequality based on estates to a new system founded upon economic class. What McAlister sought to underline was the transition from a social structure with static, defined statuses to a more open system based upon property and wealth. Since then the terms class and estate have been utilized to signify relatively open or closed social structures. Magnus Mörner (1967), for example, argued that the emerging system of economic classes could be found in the rural areas, whereas the urban areas retained more of a static, closed quality. The dichotomy of estate and class has since been widely utilized to characterize Latin American social structure.

Type
CSSH Discussion
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , October 1983 , pp. 703 - 724
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aguirre Beltrán, Gonzalo. 1946. La población negra de México: estudio etnohistórico. Mexico City.Google Scholar
Bagú, Sergio. 1952. Estructura social de la colonia. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Bishop, Yvonne; Feinberg, Stephen E.; and Holland, Paul W. 1975. Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Chance, John. 1981. “The Ecology of Race and Class in Late Colonial Oaxaca,” in Studies of Spanish American Population History, Robinson, David J., ed. Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Chance, John K., AND Taylor, William B. 1977. “Estate and Class in a Colonial City: Oaxaca in 1792.” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 19:4 (10), 454–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chance, John K., AND Taylor, William B. 1979. “Estate and Class: A Reply.” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 21:3 (07), 434–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grizzle, James E.; Starmer, C. Frank; and Koch, Gary G. 1969. “Analysis of Categorical Data by Linear Models.” Biometrics, 25:2, 489–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koch, Gary; Landis, J. Richard; Freeman, Jean L.; Freeman, Daniel H. Jr,; and Lehnen, Robert. 1977. “A General Method for the Analysis of Experiments with Repeated Measurement of Categorical Data.” Biometrics, 33:1, 133–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landis, J. Richard, AND Koch, Gary G. 1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics, 33:1, 159–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCaa, Robert; Schwartz, Stuart B.; and Grubessich, Arturo. 1979. “Race and Class in Colonial Latin America: A Critique.” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 21:3 (07), 421–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mörner, Magnus. 1967. Race Mixture in the History of Latin America. Boston.Google Scholar
Rust, Philip, AND Seed, Patricia. 1983. “Equality of Endogamy: Statistical Approaches.” Social Science Research, preprint.Google Scholar
Seed, Patricia. 1982. “Social Dimensions of Race: Mexico City, 1753.” Hispanic American Historical Review, 62:4, 569–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, David J. 1977. “Measuring Endogamy.” Social Science Research, 6, 225–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar