Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:07:37.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kinship and Contract: Property Transmission and Family Relations in Northwestern Portugal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Caroline B. Brettell
Affiliation:
Southern Methodist University

Extract

In 1886 Emile Zola published La Terre (The Earth), a novel about peasant life in nineteenth-century France. In that novel, the peasant-proprietor Fduan, aware that he has reached an age at which he can no longer farm his own property, decides to divide it among his three children. Monsieur Baillehache, the notary before whom they all appear to legalize the transaction, feels that it is his duty to “make the usual comments.”

Type
Acts of Kinship
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, Peter. 1979. “Internal Migrations and the Changing Dowry in Modern Greece.” The Indiana Social Studies Quarterly, 32, 142–56.Google Scholar
Augustins, Georges. 1987. “La position des femmes dans trois types d'organisation sociale: La lignée, la parentèle et la maison, in Femmes et Patrimoine dans les Sociétés Rurales de I'Europe Mediterranéenne, Ravis-Giordani, G., ed., 2537. Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Augustins, Georges. 1989. Comment Se Perpétuer? Devenir des Lignées et Destins des Patrimoines dans les Paysanneries Européenes. Nanterre: Societe d'Ethnologie.Google Scholar
Barthelemy, Tiphaine. 1988. “Les modes de transmission du patrimoine: Synthese des travaux effectues depuis quinze ans par les ethnologues de la France.” Etudes Rurales, nos. 110, 111, 112, pp. 195212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Rainer Lutz. 1987. “Inheritance and Inequality in a Spanish Galician Community.” Ethnohistory, 34:2, 171–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behar, Ruth. 1986. Santa Maria del Monte: The Presence of the Past in a Spanish Village. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berkner, Lutz K.; and Mendels, Franklin F.. 1978. “Inheritance Systems, Family Structure, and Demographic Patterns in Western Europe, 1700–1900, in Historical Studies of Changing Fertility, Charles, Tilly, ed., 209–24. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bossen, Laurel. 1988. “Toward a Theory of Marriage: The Economic Anthropology of Marriage Transactions.” Ethnology, 27:2, 127–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1962. “Célibat et condition paysanne.” Études Rurales, nos. 5/6, 33135.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1976. “Marriage Strategies as Strategies of Social Reproduction,” in Family and Society, Robert, Forster and Ranum, Orest, eds., 117–44. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Brandāo, Fátima. 1985. “A morte e a sobrevivencia da casa rural num concelho do noroeste,” in A Morte no Portugal Contemporãneo, Feijó, Rui G., Herminio, Martins, and Cabral, Joao de Pina, eds, 147–61. Lisbon: Editorial Quenjo.Google Scholar
Brandao, Fatima; and Robert, Rowland. 1980. “Historia da propriedade e comunidade rural: questōes de método.” Andlise Social, no. 16, 173207.Google Scholar
Brettell, Caroline B. 1986. Men Who Migrate, Women Who Wait: Population and History in a Portuguese Parish. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brettell, Caroline B.. 1988. “Emigration and Household Structure in a Portuguese Parish, 1850–1920.” Journal of Family History, 13:1, 3358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Hugh. 1973. Inishkillane. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Burguière, A. 1986. “Pour une typologie des formes d'organisation domestique de I'Europe modeme.” Annales, 41:3, 639–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casselberry, Samuel E.; and Nancy, Valavanes. 1976. “Matrilocal Greek Peasants and a Reconsideration of Residence Terminology. American Ethnologist, 3:2, 215–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaytor, Miranda. 1980. “Household and Kinship: Ryton in the Late Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth Centuries.” History Workshop Journal, 10:1, 2560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheal, David. 1988. The Gift Economy. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Collomp, Alain. 1984. “Family Tension in Early Modern Haute-Provence,” interest and Emotion: Essays on the Study of Family and Kinship, Hans, Medick and David, Sabean, eds., 145–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Comaroff, John. 1980. The Meaning of Marriage Payments. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Connell, K.H. 1968. Catholicism and Marriage in the Century after the Famine. Irish Peasant Society: Four Historical Essays. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Davis, John. 1973. Land and Family in Pisticci. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Davis, John. 1977. People of the Mediterranean: An Essay in Comparative Sociology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Delphy, C. 1974. “La transmission du status à Chardonneret.” Ethnologie Française, nos. 1/2, 4766.Google Scholar
Dias, Jorge. 1981. Vilharinho da Furna, 2nd ed.Lisbon: Imprensa Nacional.Google Scholar
Freeman, Susan. 1987. “Egalitarian Structures in Iberian Social Systems: The Contexts of Turn-Taking in Town and Country. American Ethnologist, 14:3, 470–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaulin, Steven J.C; and Boster, James S.. 1990. “Dowry as Female Competition.” American Anthropologist, 92:4, 9941005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaunt, David. 1987. “Rural Household Organization and Inheritance in Northern Europe.” Journal of Family History, 12:1–3, 121141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goody, Jack. 1973. “Bridewealth and Dowry in Africa and Eurasia,” in Bridewealth and Dowry, Goody, J., and Tambiah, S.J., eds., 158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack. 1976. Production and Reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack. 1983. The Development of the Western Family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack; Joan, Thirsk; and Thompson, E.P.. 1976. Family and Inheritance: Rural Society in Western Europe 1200–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, Susan. 1988. “Intergenerational Contracts: Familial Roots of Sexual Stratification in Taiwan,” in A Home Divided: Women and Income in the Third World, Daisy, Dwyer and Judith, Bruce, eds., 3970. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, C.A. 1982. Gifts and Commodities. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gross, Joseph J.; and Carl, Kendall. 1983. “The Analysis of Domestic Organization in Mesoamerica: The Case of Postmarital Residence in Santiago Atitlan, Guatemala,” in Heritage of Conquest: Thirty Years Later, Carl, Kendall, John, Hawkins, and Laurel, Bossen, eds., 201–27. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Habakkuk, John. 1955. “Family Structure and Economic Change in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Journal of Economic History, 15:1, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajnal, John. 1965. “European Marriage Patterns in Perspective,” in Population in History, Glass, D.V. and Eversley, D.E.C., eds., 101–43. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hajnal, John. 1983. “Two Kinds of Pre-industrial Household Formation Systems,” in Family Forms in Historic Europe, Richard, Wall, Jean, Robin and Laslett, Peter, eds., 65104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halpern, Joel. 1967. A Serbian Village. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Harrell, Stevan; and Dickey, Sara A.. 1985. “Dowry Systems in Complex Societies.” Ethnology, 24:2, 105–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzfeld, Michael. 1980. “Social Tension and Inheritance by Lot in Three Greek Villages.” Anthropological Quarterly, 53:2, 91100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschon, Renée. 1983. “Under One Roof: Marriage, Dowry and Family Relations in Piraeus,” in Urban Life in Mediterranean Europe: Anthropological Perspectives, Michael, Kenny and Kertzer, David I., eds., 299323. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hirschon, Renée 1984. “Introduction: Property, Power and Gender Relations,” in Women And Property-Women As Property, Renée, Hirschon, ed., 122. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, Diane Owen. 1978. “From Brideprice to Dowry in Mediterranean Europe.” Journal of Family History, 3:3, 262–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, G.B.; and Romney, A.K.. 1973. “Historical Inference from Cross-Cultural Data: The Case of Dowry.” Ethos, 1:4, 517–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kertzer, David I.; and Brettell, Caroline B.. 1987. Advances in Italian and Iberian Family History.” Journal of Family History, 12:1–3, 85120.Google Scholar
Khera, Sigrid. 1981. “Illegitimacy and Mode of Land Inheritance among Austrian Peasants.” Ethnology, 20:4, 307323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klapisch-Zuber, Christiane. 1985. Women, Family, and Ritual in Renaissance Italy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lamaison, Pierre. 1988. “La diversité des modes de transmission: une géographie tenace.” Etudes Rurales, nos. 110, 111, 112, pp. 119–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laslett, Peter. 1983. “Family and Household as Work Group and Kin Group: Areas of Traditional Europe Compared,” in Family Forms in Historic Europe, Richard, Wall, Jean, Robin and Peter, Laslett, eds., 513–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lison-Tolosana, Carmelo. 1976. “The Ethics of Inheritance,” in Mediterranean Family Structures, Peristiany, J.G., ed., 305–15. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loizos, Peter. 1975. “Changes in Property Transfer among Greek Cypriot Villagers.” Man, 10:4, 503–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariottini, Jean-Marc. 1987. “II corredo e la legittima,” in Femmes et patrimoine dans les Sociétés Rurales de l'Europe Méditerranéenne, Ravis-Giordani, G., ed., 163–88. Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Martin, John F. 1984. “The Relationship of Inheritance Systems to Genealogical Structures and Male Longevity.” Journal of Family History, 9:3, 291307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCreery, J.L. 1976. “Women's Property Rights and Dowry in China.” Ethnology, 15:2, 163–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, Alida. 1990. “Women and Means: Women and Family Property in Colonial Brazil.” Journal of Social History, 24:2, 277–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netting, Robert McC. 1981. Balancing on an Alp: Ecological Change and Continuity in a Swiss Mountain Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Osswald, Helena. 1990. “Dowry, Norms and Household Formation: A Case Study from North Portugal. Journal of Family History, 15:2, 201–24.Google Scholar
Pina-Cabral, Joao de. 1986. Sons of Adam, Daughters of Eve: The Peasant World View of the Alto Minho. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Donald S. 1960. “Marital Property Considerations among Peasants: An Italian Example.” Anthropological Quarterly, 33:1, 3339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plakans, Andrejs. 1989. “Stepping Down in Former Times; A Comparative Assessment of “Retirement” in Traditional Europe,” in Age Structuring in Comparative Perspective, Kertzer, David I. and Warner Schaie, K., eds., 175–95. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rheubottom, D.B. 1980. “Dowry and Wedding Celebrations in Macedonia. The Meaning of Marriage Payments,” in The Meaning of Marriage Payments, Comaroff, J.L., ed., 221–49. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Riegelhaupt, Joyce F. 1967. “Saloio Women: An Analysis of Informal Formal political Economic Roles of Portuguese Peasant Women.” Anthropological Quarterly, 40:3, 109–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabean, David. 1984. “Brothers-in-law in a South German Village Around 1800,” in Interest and Emotion: Essays on the Study of Family and Kinship, Hans, Medick and David, Sabean, eds., 171–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Salitot-Dion, M. 1977. “Stratégies de reproduction et accumulation des patrimoines fonciers.” Études Rurales, 65 (0103), 3148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sant Cassia, Paul. 1982. “Property in Greek Cypriot Marriage Strategies, 1920–1980.” Man, 17:4, 643–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, . Jane 1980.Google Scholar
“Trousseau as Treasure: Some Contradictions of Late Nineteenth Century Change in Sicily,” in Beyond the Myths of Culture: Essays in Cultural Materialism, Ross, Eric B., ed., 323–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Segalen, Martine. 1984. “Avoir sa part: Sibling Relations in Partible Inheritance Brittany,” in Interest and Emotion: Essays on the Study of Family and Kinship, Hans, Medick and David, Sabean, eds., 129–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Segalen, Martine. 1985. Quinze Générations de Bas-Bretons. Paris: Presses Universitaires. Sharma, Ursula. 1984. “Dowry in North India: Its Consequences for Women,” in Women and Property-Women as Property, Renée, Hirschon, ed., 6274. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Srinivas, M.N. 1984. Some Reflections on Dowry. New Delhi: The Centre for Women's Development Studies.Google Scholar
Tambiah, Stanley J. 1989. “Bridewealth and Dowry Revisited: The Position of Women in Sub-Saharan Africa and North India.” Current Anthropology, 30:4, 413–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tentori, Tullio. 1976. “Social Classes and Family in a Southern Italian Town: Matera,” in Mediterranean Family Structures, Peristiany, J.G., ed., 273285. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Louise; and Joan, Scott. 1978. Women, Work and Family. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Todd, Emmanuel. 1985. The Explanation of Ideology: Family Structures and Social Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolf, Eric R. 1970. “The Inheritance of Land among Bavarian and Tyrolese Peasants.” Anthropologica, 12:1, 99114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrigley, E. Anthony. 1982. “The Prospects for Population History,” in The New History: The 1980s and Beyond, Theodore, K. Rabb and Rotberg, Robert I., eds., 207–26. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zola, Emile. 1980. The Earth. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar