Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:57:46.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lamotrigine compared to placebo and other agents with antidepressant activity in patients with unipolar and bipolar depression: a comprehensive meta-analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes in short-term trials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2016

Marco Solmi Open the ORCID record for Marco Solmi [Opens in a new window] ,
Nicola Veronese Open the ORCID record for Nicola Veronese [Opens in a new window] ,
Leonardo Zaninotto ,
Marc L. M. van der Loos ,
Keming Gao ,
Ayal Schaffer ,
Catherine Reis ,
Claus Normann ,
Ion-George Anghelescu  and
Christoph U. Correll
Marco Solmi*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy Institute for Clinical Research and Education in Medicine, I.R.E.M., Padua, Italy
Nicola Veronese
Affiliation:
Institute for Clinical Research and Education in Medicine, I.R.E.M., Padua, Italy Department of Medicine—DIMED, Geriatrics Section, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
Leonardo Zaninotto
Affiliation:
Institute for Clinical Research and Education in Medicine, I.R.E.M., Padua, Italy Department of Biomedical and Neuro-Motor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Marc L. M. van der Loos
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Isala Klinieken, Location Sophia, Zwolle, the Netherlands
Keming Gao
Affiliation:
Mood & Anxiety Clinic, Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine/University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Ayal Schaffer
Affiliation:
Mood & Anxiety Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Catherine Reis
Affiliation:
Mood & Anxiety Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Claus Normann
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
Ion-George Anghelescu
Affiliation:
Dr. Kurt Fontheim’s Hospital for Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Liebenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany
Christoph U. Correll
Affiliation:
Institute for Clinical Research and Education in Medicine, I.R.E.M., Padua, Italy The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, North Shore—Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, New York, USA Hofstra North Shore LIJ School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Molecular medicine, Hempstead, New York, USA The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, New York, USA Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Bronx, New York, USA
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr. Marco Solmi, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani, 2, 35128 Padova, Italy. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives

To meta-analytically summarize lamotrigine’s effectiveness and safety in unipolar and bipolar depression.

Methods

We conducted systematic PubMed and SCOPUS reviews (last search =10/01/2015) of randomized controlled trials comparing lamotrigine to placebo or other agents with antidepressant activity in unipolar or bipolar depression. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of depression ratings, response, remission, and adverse effects calculating standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) ±95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Eighteen studies (n=2152, duration=9.83 weeks) in patients with unipolar depression (studies=4, n=187; monotherapy vs lithium=1, augmentation of antidepressants vs placebo=3) or bipolar depression (studies=14, n=1965; monotherapy vs placebo=5, monotherapy vs lithium or olanzapine+fluoxetine=2, augmentation of antidepressants vs placebo=1, augmentation of mood stabilizers vs placebo=3, augmentation of mood stabilizers vs trancylpromine, citalopram, or inositol=3) were meta-analyzed. Lamotrigine’s efficacy for depressive symptoms did not differ significantly in monotherapy vs augmentation studies (vs. placebo: p=0.98, I2=0%; vs active agents: p=0.48, I2=0%) or in unipolar vs bipolar patients (vs placebo: p=0.60, I2=0%), allowing pooling of each placebo-controlled and active-controlled trials. Lamotrigine outperformed placebo regarding depressive symptoms (studies=11, n=713 vs n=696; SMD=–0.15, 95% CI=–0.27, –0.02, p=0.02, heterogeneity: p=0.24) and response (after removing one extreme outlier; RR=1.42, 95% CI=1.13–1.78; p=0.003, heterogeneity: p=0.08). Conversely, lamotrigine did not differ regarding efficacy on depressive symptoms, response, or remission from lithium, olanzapine+fluoxetine, citalopram, or inositol (studies=6, n=306 vs n=318, p-values=0.85–0.92). Adverse effects and all-cause/specific-cause discontinuation were similar across all comparisons.

Conclusions

Lamotrigine was superior to placebo in improving unipolar and bipolar depressive symptoms, without causing more frequent adverse effects/discontinuations. Lamotrigine did not differ from lithium, olanzapine+fluoxetine, citalopram, or inositol.

Keywords

Bipolar depressionbipolar disorderlamotriginemajor depressive disordertrialsunipolar depression
Type
Original Research
Information
CNS Spectrums , Volume 21 , Issue 5 , October 2016 , pp. 403 - 418
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Calabrese, JR, Hirschfeld, RM, Frye, MA, Reed, ML. Impact of depressive symptoms compared with manic symptoms in bipolar disorder: results of a U.S. community-based sample. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004; 65(11): 1499–1504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Judd, LL, Akiskal, HS, Schettler, PJ, et al. The long-term natural history of the weekly symptomatic status of bipolar I disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002; 59(6): 530–537.Google Scholar
3. Judd, LL, Akiskal, HS, Schettler, PJ, et al. A prospective investigation of the natural history of the long-term weekly symptomatic status of bipolar II disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003; 60(3): 261–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Ekman, M, Granstrom, O, Omerov, S, Jacob, J, Landen, M. The societal cost of bipolar disorder in Sweden. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013; 48(10): 1601–1610.Google Scholar
5. Miller, S, Dell’Osso, B, Ketter, TA. The prevalence and burden of bipolar depression. J Affect Disord. 2014; 169(Suppl 1): S3–S11.Google Scholar
6. Parker, G, McCraw, S, Hadzi-Pavlovic, D, Fletcher, K. Costs of the principal mood disorders: a study of comparative direct and indirect costs incurred by those with bipolar I, bipolar II and unipolar disorders. J Affect Disord. 2013; 149(1–3): 46–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Lam, RW, Kennedy, SH, Grigoriadis, S, et al. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) clinical guidelines for the management of major depressive disorder in adults. III. Pharmacotherapy. J Affect Disord. 2009; 117(Suppl 1): S26–S43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (UK). Updated ed. Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society; 2010.Google Scholar
9. Pacchiarotti, I, Bond, DJ, Baldessarini, RJ, et al. The International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) task force report on antidepressant use in bipolar disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2013; 170(11): 1249–1262.Google Scholar
10. Yatham, LN, Kennedy, SH, Parikh, SV, et al. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) collaborative update of CANMAT guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder: update 2013. Bipolar Disord. 2013; 15(1): 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Liu, CC, Liang, KY, Liao, SC. Antidepressant-associated mania: soon after switch from fluoxetine to mirtazapine in an elderly woman with mixed depressive features. J Psychopharmacol. 2009; 23(2): 220–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Post, RM, Altshuler, LL, Leverich, GS, et al. Mood switch in bipolar depression: comparison of adjunctive venlafaxine, bupropion and sertraline. Br J Psychiatry. 2006; 189(2): 124–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Viktorin, A, Lichtenstein, P, Thase, ME, et al. The risk of switch to mania in patients with bipolar disorder during treatment with an antidepressant alone and in combination with a mood stabilizer. Am J Psychiatry. 2014; 171(10): 1067–1073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Kim, SJ, Lee, YJ, Lee, YJ, Cho, SJ. Effect of quetiapine XR on depressive symptoms and sleep quality compared with lithium in patients with bipolar depression. J Affect Disord. 2014; 157: 33–40.Google Scholar
15. Vieta, E, Valenti, M. Pharmacological management of bipolar depression: acute treatment, maintenance, and prophylaxis. CNS Drugs. 2013; 27(7): 515–529.Google Scholar
16. Baldessarini, RJ, Vieta, E, Calabrese, JR, Tohen, M, Bowden, CL. Bipolar depression: overview and commentary. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2010; 18(3): 143–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Bennabi, D, Aouizerate, B, El-Hage, W, et al. Risk factors for treatment resistance in unipolar depression: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2015; 171: 137–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Cardoso de Almeida, JR, Phillips, ML. Distinguishing between unipolar depression and bipolar depression: current and future clinical and neuroimaging perspectives. Biol Psychiatry. 2013; 73(2): 111–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Parker, G, McCraw, S, Hadzi-Pavlovic, D, Hong, M, Barrett, M. Bipolar depression: prototypically melancholic in its clinical features. J Affect Disord. 2013; 147(1–3): 331–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Rastelli, CP, Cheng, Y, Weingarden, J, Frank, E, Swartz, HA. Differences between unipolar depression and bipolar II depression in women. J Affect Disord. 2013; 150(3): 1120–1124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Reid, JG, Gitlin, MJ, Altshuler, LL. Lamotrigine in psychiatric disorders. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013; 74(7): 675–684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Desarkar, P, Sinha, VK. Lamotrigine-induced severe manic switch. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006; 40(8): 718.Google Scholar
23. Leverich, GS, Altshuler, LL, Frye, MA, et al. Risk of switch in mood polarity to hypomania or mania in patients with bipolar depression during acute and continuation trials of venlafaxine, sertraline, and bupropion as adjuncts to mood stabilizers. Am J Psychiatry. 2006; 163(2): 232–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Ketter, TA, Miller, S, Dell’Osso, B, Calabrese, JR, Frye, MA, Citrome, L. Balancing benefits and harms of treatments for acute bipolar depression. J Affect Disord. 2014; 169(Suppl 1): S24–S33.Google Scholar
25. Taylor, DM, Cornelius, V, Smith, L, Young, AH. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of drug treatments for bipolar depression: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2014; 130(6): 452–469.Google Scholar
26. Tundo, A, de Filippis, R, Proietti, L. Pharmacologic approaches to treatment resistant depression: evidences and personal experience. World J Psychiatry. 2015; 5(3): 330–341.Google Scholar
27. Geddes, JR, Calabrese, JR, Goodwin, GM. Lamotrigine for treatment of bipolar depression: independent meta-analysis and meta-regression of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Br J Psychiatry. 2009; 194(1): 4–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Selle, V, Schalkwijk, S, Vazquez, GH, Baldessarini, RJ. Treatments for acute bipolar depression: meta-analyses of placebo-controlled, monotherapy trials of anticonvulsants, lithium and antipsychotics. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2014; 47(2): 43–52.Google Scholar
29. Vieta, E, Locklear, J, Günther, O, et al. Treatment options for bipolar depression: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010; 30(5): 579–590.Google Scholar
30. Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, Altman, DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151(4): 264–269.Google Scholar
31. Montgomery, SA, Asberg, M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979; 134(4): 382–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Hamilton, M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 1960; 23: 56–62.Google Scholar
33. Hamilton, M. Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1967; 6(4): 278–296.Google Scholar
34. Higgins, J, Altman, DG, Gøtzsche, PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011; 343: d5928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35. DerSimonian, R, Laird, N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7(3): 177–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Higgins, JPT, Thompson, SG, Deeks, JJ, Altman, DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003; 327(7414): 557–560.Google Scholar
37. Egger, M, Davey Smith, G, Schneider, M, Minder, C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997; 315(7109): 629–634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38. Begg, CB, Mazumdar, M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994; 50(4): 1088–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. Normann, C, Hummel, B, Scharer, LO, Horn, M, Grunze, H, Walden, J. Lamotrigine as adjunct to paroxetine in acute depression: a placebo-controlled, double-blind study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002; 63(4): 337–344.Google Scholar
40. Lieb, K, Walden, J, Grunze, H, Fiebich, BL, Berger, M, Normann, C. Serum levels of substance P and response to antidepressant pharmacotherapy. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2004; 37(5): 238–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41. Brown, EB, McElroy, SL, Keck, PE Jr, et al. A 7-week, randomized, double-blind trial of olanzapine/fluoxetine combination versus lamotrigine in the treatment of bipolar I depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006; 67(7): 1025–1033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42. Brown, E, Dunner, DL, McElroy, SL, et al. Olanzapine/fluoxetine combination vs. lamotrigine in the 6-month treatment of bipolar I depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009; 12(6): 773–782.Google Scholar
43. Calabrese, JR, Bowden, CL, Sachs, GS, Ascher, JA, Monaghan, E, Rudd, GD. A double-blind placebo-controlled study of lamotrigine monotherapy in outpatients with bipolar I depression. Lamictal 602 Study Group. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999; 60(2): 79–88.Google Scholar
44. Calabrese, JR, Huffman, RF, White, RL, et al. Lamotrigine in the acute treatment of bipolar depression: results of five double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Bipolar Disord. 2008; 10(2): 323–333.Google Scholar
45. Brown, ES, Sunderajan, P, Hu, LT, Sowell, SM, Carmody, TJ. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, trial of lamotrigine therapy in bipolar disorder, depressed or mixed phase and cocaine dependence. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012; 37(11): 2347–2354.Google Scholar
46. Schindler, F, Anghelescu, IG. Lithium versus lamotrigine augmentation in treatment resistant unipolar depression: a randomized, open-label study. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007; 22(3): 179–182.Google Scholar
47. Suppes, T, Marangell, LB, Bernstein, IH, et al. A single blind comparison of lithium and lamotrigine for the treatment of bipolar II depression. J Affect Disord. 2008; 111(2–3): 334–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48. Nierenberg, AA, Ostacher, MJ, Calabrese, JR, et al. Treatment-resistant bipolar depression: a STEP-BD equipoise randomized effectiveness trial of antidepressant augmentation with lamotrigine, inositol, or risperidone. Am J Psychiatry. 2006; 163(2): 210–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49. Nolen, WA, Kupka, RW, Hellemann, G, et al. Tranylcypromine vs. lamotrigine in the treatment of refractory bipolar depression: a failed but clinically useful study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007; 115(5): 360–365.Google Scholar
50. Barbee, JG, Thompson, TR, Jamhour, NJ, et al. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of lamotrigine as an antidepressant augmentation agent in treatment-refractory unipolar depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011; 72(10): 1405–1412.Google Scholar
51. Barbosa, L, Berk, M, Vorster, M. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of augmentation with lamotrigine or placebo in patients concomitantly treated with fluoxetine for resistant major depressive episodes. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003; 64(4): 403–407.Google Scholar
52. Santos, MA, Rocha, FL, Hara, C. Efficacy and safety of antidepressant augmentation with lamotrigine in patients with treatment-resistant depression: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2008; 10(3): 187–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
53. Schaffer, A, Zuker, P, Levitt, A. Randomized, double-blind pilot trial comparing lamotrigine versus citalopram for the treatment of bipolar depression. J Affect Disord. 2006; 96(1–2): 95–99.Google Scholar
54. Kemp, DE, Gao, K, Fein, EB, Chan, , et al. Lamotrigine as add-on treatment to lithium and divalproex: lessons learned from a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in rapid-cycling bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord . 2012; 14(7): 780–789.Google Scholar
55. van der Loos, ML, Mulder, PG, Hartong, EG, et al. Efficacy and safety of lamotrigine as add-on treatment to lithium in bipolar depression: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009; 70(2): 223–231.Google Scholar
56. Wang, Z, Gao, K, Kemp, DE, et al. Lamotrigine adjunctive therapy to lithium and divalproex in depressed patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder and a recent substance use disorder: a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2010; 43(4): 5–21.Google Scholar
57. Sachs, GS, Guille, C, McMurrich, SL. A clinical monitoring form for mood disorders. Bipolar Disord. 2002; 4(5): 323–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58. Gao, K, Yuan, C, Wu, R, et al. Important clinical features of atypical antipsychotics in acute bipolar depression that inform routine clinical care: a review of pivotal studies with number needed to treat. Neurosci Bull. 2015; 31(5): 572–588.Google Scholar
59. Carvalho, AF, Quevedo, J, McIntyre, RS, et al. Treatment implications of predominant polarity and the polarity index: a comprehensive review. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014; 18(2): pyu079.Google Scholar
60. Gitlin, M, Frye, MA. Maintenance therapies in bipolar disorders. Bipolar Disord. 2012; 14(Suppl 2): 51–65.Google Scholar
61. Lin, CY, Tsai, GE, Wang, HS, et al. Effectiveness of aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone augmentation treatment for major depressive disorder: a nationwide population-based study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014; 75(9): e924–e931.Google Scholar
62. Parker, G, McCraw, S. The ‘disconnect’ between initial judgments of lamotrigine vs. its real-world effectiveness in managing bipolar disorder. A tale with wider ramifications. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015; 132(5): 345–354.Google Scholar
63. Bowden, CL, Singh, V. Lamotrigine (Lamictal IR) for the treatment of bipolar disorder. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012; 13(17): 2565–2571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
64. Rosa, AR, Fountoulakis, K, Siamouli, M, Gonda, X, Vieta, E. Is anticonvulsant treatment of mania a class effect? Data from randomized clinical trials. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2011; 17(3): 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
65. Rihmer, Z, Gonda, X, Kalman, J. [Treatment of bipolar disorder with lamotrigine—relapse rate and suicidal behaviour during 6 month follow-up]. Neuropsychopharmacol Hung. 2015; 17(1): 7–13.Google ScholarPubMed
66. Bhowmik, D, Aparasu, RR, Rajan, SS, Sherer, JT, Ochoa-Perez, M, Chen, H. Risk of manic switch associated with antidepressant therapy in pediatric bipolar depression. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2014; 24(10): 551–561.Google Scholar
67. Park, KJ, Shon, S, Lee, JH, Joo, Y, Youngstrom, EA, Kim, HW. Antidepressant-emergent mood switch in Korean adolescents with mood disorder. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2014; 37(6): 177–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
68. Maayan, L, Correll, CU. Weight gain and metabolic risks associated with antipsychotic medications in children and adolescents. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2011; 21(6): 517–535.Google Scholar
69. Zhang, JP, Gallego, JA, Robinson, DG, Malhotra, AQ, Kane, JM, Correll, CU. Efficacy and safety of individual second-generation vs. first-generation antipsychotics in first-episode psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013; 16(6): 1205–1218.Google Scholar
70. Musil, R, Obermeier, M, Russ, P, Hamerle, M. Weight gain and antipsychotics: a drug safety review. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015; 14(1): 73–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
71. Blaszczyk, B, Lason, W, Czuczwar, SJ. Antiepileptic drugs and adverse skin reactions: an update. Pharmacol Rep. 2015; 67(3): 426–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
72. Calabrese, JR, Sullivan, JR, Bowden, CL, et al. Rash in multicenter trials of lamotrigine in mood disorders: clinical relevance and management. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002; 63(11): 1012–1019.Google Scholar
73. Johannessen Landmark, C, Patsalos, PN. Drug interactions involving the new second- and third-generation antiepileptic drugs. Expert Rev Neurother. 2010; 10(1): 119–140.Google Scholar
74. Patsalos, PN, Perucca, E. Clinically important drug interactions in epilepsy: general features and interactions between antiepileptic drugs. Lancet Neurol. 2003; 2: 347–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Solmi supplementary material

Appendix 1-2

Download Solmi supplementary material(File)
File 29.5 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Solmi supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Solmi supplementary material(Image)
Image 1.7 MB