Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:14:47.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economics of decriminalizing mental illness: when doing the right thing costs less

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2020

Darci Delgado Open the ORCID record for Darci Delgado [Opens in a new window] ,
Ashley Breth ,
Shelley Hill ,
Katherine Warburton Open the ORCID record for Katherine Warburton [Opens in a new window]  and
Stephen M. Stahl
Darci Delgado*
Affiliation:
California Department of State Hospitals, Sacramento, California, USA
Ashley Breth
Affiliation:
California Department of State Hospitals, Sacramento, California, USA
Shelley Hill
Affiliation:
California Department of State Hospitals, Sacramento, California, USA University of California, Davis, California, USA
Katherine Warburton
Affiliation:
California Department of State Hospitals, Sacramento, California, USA University of California, Davis, California, USA
Stephen M. Stahl
Affiliation:
California Department of State Hospitals, Sacramento, California, USA University of California, San Diego, California, USA
*
*Author for correspondence: Darci Delgado (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The United States’ criminal justice system has seen exponential growth in costs related to the incarceration of persons with mental illness. Jails, prisons, and state hospitals’ resources are insufficient to adequately treat the sheer number of individuals cycling through their system. Reversing the cycle of criminalization of mental illness is a complicated process, but mental health diversion programs across the nation are uniquely positioned to do just that. Not only are these programs providing humane treatment to individuals within the community and breaking the cycle of recidivism, the potential fiscal savings are over 1 billion dollars.

Keywords

economicsdiversionmental healthforensictreatment.
Type
Perspectives
Information
CNS Spectrums , Volume 25 , Issue 5 , October 2020 , pp. 566 - 570
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The findings and conclusions in “Economics of decriminalizing mental illness: when doing the right thing costs less” are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of the California Department of State Hospitals or the California Health and Human Services Agency.

References

References:

Martin, AB, Hartman, M, Washington, B, Catlin, A, Team NHEA. National Health Care Spending in 2017: growth slows to post-great recession rates; share of GDP stabilizes. Health Affairs. 2019;38(1):05085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White House Council of Economic Advisors. Economic Perspectives on Incarceration and the Criminal Justice System. Washington DC: Penny Hill Press; 2016.Google Scholar
Giliberti, M. NAMI Website. https://www.nami.org/Blogs/From-the-Executive-Director/May-2015/Treatment,-Not-Jail-It’s-Time-to-Step-Up. 2015.Google Scholar
Salas, N. NYC Jail’s Population: Who’s There and Why. New York City Independent Budget Office, Department of Correction, New York, NY. 2012.Google Scholar
Lutterman, T, Shaw, R, Fisher, W, Manderscheid, R. Trend in Psychiatric Inpatient Capacity, United States and Each State, 1970 to 2014. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors; 2017.Google Scholar
Munetz, MR, Griffin, PA. Use of the Sequential Intercept Model as an approach to decriminalization of people with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Serv. 2006;57(4):544–549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowell, AJ, Hinde, JM, Broner, N, Aldridge, AP. The impact on taxpayer costs of a jail diversion program for people with serious mental illness. Eval Progr Plan. 2013;41:31–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broner, N, Mayrl, DW, Landsberg, G. Outcomes of mandated and nonmandated New York City jail diversion for offenders with alcohol, drug, and mental disorders. Prison J. 2005;85(1):18–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of State Hospitals. DSH Diversion Funding Program. Sacramento, Ca; 2018.Google Scholar
Ochoa, K, Kim, E, Appel, O, Stephens, D. An Estimate of Persons in the Jail Mental Health Population Likely to be Appropriate for Safe Release into Community Services. Los Angeles County, CA: Health Services; 2019.Google Scholar
Miller, JE. Too Significant to Fail: The Importance of State Behavioral Health Agencies in the Daily Lives of Americans with Mental Illness, for their Families, and for their Communities: National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors; 2012.Google Scholar
Hoff, RA, Baranosky, MV, Buchanan, J, Zonana, H, Rosenheck, RA. The effects of a jail diversion program on incarceration: a retrospective cohort study. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law Online. 1999;27(3):377–386.Google ScholarPubMed
Tyuse, SW. The effectiveness of a jail diversion program in linking participants to federal entitlements and stable housing. Calif J Health Promot. 2005;3:84–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steadman, HJ, Naples, M. Assessing the effectiveness of jail diversion programs for persons with serious mental illness and co‐occurring substance use disorders. Behav Sci Law. 2005;23(2):163–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrichson, C, Joshua, R, Delaney, R. The Price of Jails: Measuring the Taxpayer Cost of Local Incarceration. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice; 2015.Google Scholar