Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:59:38.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-ray diffraction and infrared characterization of Oxisols from central and southeastern Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

R. P. Nitzsche ,
J. B. Percival ,
J. K. Torrance ,
J. A. R. Stirling  and
J. T. Bowen
R. P. Nitzsche*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Carleton University, Loeb Building, Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6
J. B. Percival
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0E8
J. K. Torrance
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Carleton University, Loeb Building, Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6
J. A. R. Stirling
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0E8
J. T. Bowen
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Carleton University, Loeb Building, Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Eleven Oxisols with high clay contents, 2.6–59.7 wt.% Fe2O3, and containing hematite, goethite, magnetite and maghemite, from São Paulo, Minas Gerais and Goiás, Brazil, were studied for the purpose of microwave remote sensing applications in the 0.3 to 300 GHz range. Of special interest are: the pseudosand effect caused by Fe-oxide cementation of clusters of soil particles; the mineralogy; and whether the soil magnetic susceptibility affected by ferromagnetic magnetite and maghemite interferes with microwave propagation. Quantitative mineralogical analyses were conducted using X-ray diffraction with Rietveld refinement. Visible, near infrared and short wave infrared spectroscopic analyses were used to characterize the samples qualitatively for comparison with published spectral radiometry results. Quartz (3–88%), hematite (2–36%) and gibbsite (1–40%) occurred in all soils, whereas kaolinite (2–70%) and anatase (2–13%) occurred in nine samples. Ilmenite (1–8%) was found in eight soils and goethite (2–39%) in seven. Of the ferromagnetic minerals, maghemite occurred in seven soils (1–13%) and three contained magnetite (<2%). These results will be applied to the interpretation of the effect of Fe oxides, particularly the ferromagnetic oxides, on microwave interaction with high-Fe soils, with ultimate application to the monitoring of soil water content by microwave remote sensing.

Keywords

XRDIROxisolsBrazilhematitegoethitemagnetitemaghemite
Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 549 - 560
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, B. & Hayek, B.F. (1989) Mineral occurrence in soil environments. Pp 199-278 in: Minerals in Soil Environments. (Dixon, J.B. & Weed, S.B., editors). Soil Science Society of America Book Series No. 5, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, V. & Torrent, J. (2002) Evidence for a simple pathway to maghemite in Earth and Mars soils. Geochimica et Coscmochimica Ada, 66, 2801–2806.Google Scholar
Baumgardner, M.F., Silva, L.R.F., Biehl, L.L. & Stoner, E.R. (1985) Reflectance properties of soils. Advances in Agronomy, 38, 1–44.Google Scholar
Bowers, S.A. & Hanks, R.J. (1965) Reflection of radiant energy from soils. Soil Science, 100, 130–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, S.A. & Smith, S.J. (1972) Spectrophotometric determination of soil water content. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 36, 978–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruker, A.X.S. (2003) TOPAS V2.1: General profile and structure analysis software for powder diffraction data — User's Manual, Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany.Google Scholar
Cornell, R.M. & Schwertmann, U. (2003) The Iron Oxides: Structure, Properties, Reactions, Occurrences and Uses. 2 nd edition. Wiley-VHC Verlag GmbH & Co. Weinheim, Germany.Google Scholar
Curi, N. & Franzmeier, D.P. (1984) Toposequence of Oxisols from the Central Plateau of Brazil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 48, 341–346.Google Scholar
Curi, N. & Franzmeier, D.P. (1987) Effect of parent material on chemical and mineralogical properties of some Oxisols in Brazil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 51, 153–158.Google Scholar
El-Swaify, S.A. (1980) Physical and mechanical properties of Oxisols. Pp. 303–323 in: Soils with Variable Charge (Theng, B.K.G., editor). New Zealand Society of Soil Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand.Google Scholar
EMBRAPA (1984) Guia de excursdo de estudos de solos nos estaãos de Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo e Parana. Ill Reunião de Classiftcação, Correlação de Solos e Interpretação de Aptidão Agrícola. Servico Nacional de Levantamento e Conservacao de Solos (SNLCS) e Sociedade Brasileira de Ciencia do Solo (SBCS), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.Google Scholar
Engman, E.T. (1991) Applications of microwave remote sensing of soil moisture for water resources and agriculture. Remote Sensing of Environment, 35, 213–226.Google Scholar
Escadafal, R., Girard, M.C. & Courrault, D. (1989) Munsell soil color and soil reflectance in the visible spectra bands of Landsat MSS and TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 27, 37–46.Google Scholar
Fabris, D., Coey, J.M.D. & Mussel, W.D.N. (1998) Magnetic soils from mafic lithodomains in Brazil. Hyperfine Interactions, 113, 249–258.Google Scholar
Hunt, G.R. & Salisbury, J.W. (1970) Visible and nearinfrared spectra of minerals and rocks I: Silicate minerals. Modern Geology, 1, 283–300.Google Scholar
Hunt, G.R. & Salisbury, J.W. (1971) Visible and near-infrared spectra of minerals and rocks II: Carbonates. Modern Geology, 2, 23–30.Google Scholar
Ketterings, Q.M., Bingham, J.M. & Laperche, V. (2000) Changes in mineralogy and texture caused by slash-and burn fires in Sumatra, Indonesia. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64, 1108–1116.Google Scholar
Le Borgne, E. (1955) Abnormal magnetic susceptibility of the top soil. Annals of Geophysics, 11, 399–419.Google Scholar
Legger, D. (1991) Mineral soils conditioned by a wet (sub) tropical climate. Pp. 145–185 in: The Major Soils of the World (Driessen, P.M. & Dudal, R., editors). Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, Agricultural University Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Leone, A.P. & Escadafal, R. (2001) Statistical analysis of soil color for spectroradiometric data for hyperspectral remote sensing of soil properties (example of southern Italy Mediterranean ecosystem). International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22, 2311–2328.Google Scholar
Mullins, C.C. (1977) Magnetic susceptibility of the soil and its significance in soil science — a review. Journal of Soil Science, 28, 223–146.Google Scholar
Oliveira, J.B. & Menk, J.R.F. (1984) Latossolos Roxos do Estado de São Paulo. Boletim Tecnico No. 82, 132 pp. Institute Agronomico, Campinas, S.P. Brasil.Google Scholar
Oliveira, J.B. & Prado, H. (1984) Levantamento Pedologico Semidetalhado do Estado de São Paulo: Quadricula de São Carlos II Memorial Descritivo. Boletim Tecnico No. 98, 188 pp. Institute Agronomico, Campinas, S.P. Brasil.Google Scholar
Oliveira, J.B. & Prado, H. (1987) Levantamento Pedológico Semidetalhado do Estado de São Paulo: Quadrícula de Ribeirao Preto II Memorial Descritivo. Boletim Cientifico No. 7, 132 pp. Institute Agronomico, Campinas, S.P. Brasil.Google Scholar
Percival, J.B., Wasyliuk, K., Reif, T., Bernier, S., Drever, G. & Perkins, C.T. (2002) Mineralogical aspects of three drill cores along the McArthur River transect using a portable infrared spectrometer. In: Summary of Investigations 2002, Vol. 2, Saskatchewan Geological Survey, Saskatchewan Industry and Resources, Miscellaneous Report, 2002-4.1.Google Scholar
Robinson, D.A., Bell, J.P. & Batchelor, C.H. (1994) Influence of iron minerals on the determination of soil water content using dielectrics techniques. Journal of Hydrology, 161, 169–180.Google Scholar
Sanchez, P.A. (1976) Properties and Management of Soils in the Tropics. Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Santos, M.C.D., Mermutt, A.R. & Ribeiro, M.R. (1989) Submicroscopy of clay microaggregates in an Oxisol from Pernambuco, Brazil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 53, 1895–1901.Google Scholar
Schwertmann, U. & Taylor, R.M. (1979) Iron Oxides. Pp. 145–181 in: Minerals in Soil Environments (Dinaur, R.C., editor). Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
Stanjek, H. (1987) The formation of maghemite and hematite from lepidocrocite and goethite in a Cambisol in Corsica, France. Zeitscrift Pflanzenernahrung und Bodenkunde 150, 314–318.Google Scholar
Stoner, E.R. & Baumgardner, M.F. (1981) Characteristic variations in reflectance of surface soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 45, 1161–1165.Google Scholar
Sunmer, M.E. (1961) The influence of precipitated iron oxides on surface properties of clays and soils. DPhil. thesis, University of Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Taylor, R.M. & Schwertmann, U. (1974) Maghemite in soils and its origins I. Properties and observations on soil maghemites. Clay Minerals, 10, 289–298.Google Scholar
Ulaby, F.T., Moore, R.K. & Fung, A. (1986) Microwave Remote Sensing, Active and Passive Vol III: From Theory to Applications. Artech House, Norwood, Massachusetts, USA, pp. 2087–2104.Google Scholar
Ulaby, F.T., Sarabandi, K., McDonald, K., Whitt, M. & Dobson, C. (1990) Michigan microwave canopy scattering model. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 11, 1223–1253.Google Scholar