No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0009840X00166934/resource/name/firstPage-S0009840X00166934a.jpg)
- Type
- Review Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1891
References
page 197 note 1 I can find no instance of , though I think it is sufficiently defended by some of the instances of the article with numerals. If we read
(with or without
), we may suppose that τὸ, miswritten after παρὸν as well as before it, was wrongly read as the contracted sign for των.
page 198 note 1 Though of course such a phrase as would be impossible with the participle as present, since it would then be no longer attributive but adverbial, and therefore must express time in relation to