Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-956mj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T17:54:17.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Title of Fortuna?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

H. J. Rose
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 42 , Issue 5 , November 1928 , pp. 171
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

5 On Aen. II. 514. See Wissowa, , Relig. u. Kult. d. Römer 2, p. 163.Google Scholar

6 See Carter, J. B., De deorum Romanorum cognominibus, p. 41.Google Scholar

7 Festus, p. 298, Lindsay. The reading in eodem penate, which some of the older dictionaries quote from Livy XXVIII. 18, 2, is nothing but a very bad conjecture of Sigonius, and false Latin.