Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:32:51.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Historical Significance of the Odes of Horace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

E. R. Garnsey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , July 1929 , pp. 104 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 106 note 1 Cf. Odes I. 1.; and Ausonius, Id. XX. 7, ‘Signat cuncta manu loquitur Polyhymnia gestu’; also Inscr. Herculan., Πογὑμνια μὑθους; and Ciris, 55, ‘amat P. verum.’

page 107 note 1 The references of the ancient historians, etc., to the plight of Maecenas were collected for an address to the Oxford Philological Society in 1908, and have been published in the Sewanee (U.S.A.) Review for April-June, 1924, vol. xxxii., No. 2, under the title The Fall of Maecenas.

page 107 note 2 Proculeius committed suicide by taking poison; the date is unknown. See Pliny, N.H. 35. 59. His fatherly love was ill requited, according to Quintilian—see Inst. 9. 3. 68—but apparently, so far as he knew, by a son.

page 107 note 3 See the present writer's Translation and Exposition of the Odes, Introd., § 96 ff.

page 111 note 1 Cf. the writer's Student's Edition of the Odes, pp. 275, 280.

page 111 note 2 Cf. Persius, Sat. I. 116, discussed in the writer's Translation and Exposition of the Odes, p. 228.