Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:05:58.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Greek Evidence for the Origin of the Imperial Appeal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

A. H. Greenidge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , April 1894 , pp. 142 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1894

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 143 note 1 Even in this case it may not be an appeal because the emperor still continued to exercise this jurisdiction personally (Vit. Hadriani 22).

page 143 note 2 Plin. (ad Trai. 81) says that he was ‘appellatum’: and yet this was admittedly a case of first instance, arising from the request of the prosecutor ‘ut cognoscerem pro tribunali.’

page 144 note 1 If we do not follow Dio's apparent statement that had ‘maius imperium’ over these (liii. 32).