No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
page 89 note 1 Euripides and the Attic Orators, p. 38.
page 89 note 2 Μοίρας δολώσας, Alcestis 12.
page 89 note 3 
Alcestis 33.
page 89 note 4 Medca 410–413.
page 90 note 1 Dr. Verrall's treatment of the Alcestis in his Euripides the Rationalist is sufficient proof of this.
page 90 note 2 Euripide et l'Esprit de son Théâtre, p. 25 ff.
page 91 note 1 For the moment I exclude the Bacchae.
page 91 note 2 
. Fr. 294.
page 91 note 3 Iph. T. 387.
page 91 note 4 Her. F. 1341–6.
page 91 note 5 
, Fr. 1007.
page 91 note 6 Hel. 998.
page 91 note 7 Ion. 384.
page 91 note 8 Ibid. 449.
page 91 note 9 Troad 885.
page 91 note 10 Her. Fur. 62.
page 91 note 11 Ion 1117–18.
page 91 note 12 Fr. 941.
page 91 note 13 Suppl. 504.7
page 91 note 14 Hel. 903.
page 92 note 1 Hipp. 1103.
page 92 note 2 Cf. the rejection by thinking undergraduates of some Christian dogmas which a maturer judgment and riper reflection leads theologians of equal intellectual sincerity to retain.
page 92 note 3 Bacchae 417.
page 92 note 4 Bacchae 890.
page 92 note 5 Euripides and the Attic Orators, p. 36.
page 92 note 6 Jones, W. H. S., The Moral Standpoint of Euripides, p. 31.Google Scholar