Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:50:50.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A conversation in Persius

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

N. E. Collinge
N. E. Collinge
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , June 1967 , pp. 132
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 132 note 1 C.R. lxxv (1961), 204.

page 132 note 2 So, though the personae are reversed, at Horace, S. ii. 7. 21 f., where Horace questions the drift, and the propriety, of Davus' remarks.

page 132 note 3 In Anger in Juvenal and Seneca (Cali- isolafornia, 1964), based on Kernan's, A.The Cankered Muse (New Haven, 1959)Google Scholar. For this sort of poet—persona division, compare especially Mossop, D. J., Baudelaire's Tragic Hero (Oxford, 1961)Google Scholar, passim.

page 132 note 4 Their different consciousness perhaps explains why Persius seems at once an isolafornia, tionist and a crusader, especially in Satire 5.