The Aristotelian Enthymeme

R. C. Seaton

doi:10.1017/S0009840X00007162

The Aristotelian Enthymeme

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009

R. C. Seaton

Show author details

R. C. Seaton: Affiliation:
Reigate

Article contents

Abstract
References

Get access

Rights & Permissions

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Original Contributions
Information: The Classical Review , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , June 1914 , pp. 113 - 119

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X00007162 [Opens in a new window]
Copyright: Copyright © The Classical Association 1914

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

^{page 113 note 1} Blackwood's Magazine, December, 1828.

^{page 113 note 2} I say ‘almost’ because the enthymeme of later times was not limited to a syllogism ‘from likelihoods or signs,’ as Cope would of course have limited Aristotle's.

^{page 113 note 3} Ancient Classics for English Readers: Aristotle, p. 81.

^{page 114 note 1} Laws of Thought, pp. 247, 248.

^{page 114 note 2} Rhet., 1. 2. 14.

^{page 114 note 3} V. 10., §§ 1, 2.

^{page 114 note 4} E.g., Whately, Thomson, Jevons, Joseph.

^{page 114 note 5} Or, instead of one premiss, the conclusion may be suppressed.

^{page 114 note 6} Introduction to Aristotle's Rhetoric, p. 103 and note.

^{page 115 note 1} Logic, by R. F. Clarke, p. 357.

^{page 115 note 2} Rhet. i. 2. 18.

^{page 116 note 1} Classical Review, i., p. 98 f.

^{page 116 note 2} Anal. Post., i. 10. 7.

^{page 117 note 1} Cope, loc. cit., pp. 164, 165 ; Ar. Rhet. i. 2. 18.

^{page 117 note 2} Rhet. ad Alex., c. 10.

^{page 117 note 3} Topica, § 55. See Reid on pro Sulla, § 32.

^{page 118 note 1} V. 10. 1.

^{page 118 note 2} Ed. Vatic, i., p. 141.

^{page 118 note 3} Vol. ii., p. 289.

^{page 118 note 4} Mansel's Aldrich, Appendix F.

Article contents

The Aristotelian Enthymeme

Abstract

Access options

References

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests