Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:51:23.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ΦΙΛΟΔΙΚΕΙΝ ΔΟΚΟΥΜΕΝ (Thuc. i. 77)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

E. G. Turner
E. G. Turner
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , April 1946 , pp. 5 - 7
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 5 note 1 And none at all subsequently, though I do not claim an exhaustive search for the later period. For help in the hunt and the benefit of discussion I am grateful to Professor A. Cameron.

page 6 note 1 P. 237, ‘The charge of litigiousness can only follow the establishment of courts in Athens’. I would, indeed, quarrel with most of this paragraph, especially with 1. II, ‘We might have used force; instead we establish law-courts’; the argument is no more than ‘instead we go to law (δικζεσθαι)’.

page 6 note 2 Carried to extremes by Bonner, R. J., C.P. xiv (1919), p. 286Google Scholar, who translates φιλοδικεῖν as if it were φιληλιαστα εἷναι.

page 6 note 1 Not, as Gomme, op. cit., p. 243, answering a particular charge.