Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:45:37.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Passages from the Metamorphosis of Ovid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1920

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 96 note 1 This device is more frequent in the Horatian than in the Ovidian Hexameter. Cf. Hor. S. i. 2. 62 ; 9. 51; ii. 3. 117 and 179; Ep. ii. 2. 93 and 188 ; A.P. 290 and 424. Here it seems to me to help most effectively the ascending scale : ‘cives—finitimi—orbis !’ The ‘overflow’ is in every sense of the word momentous. It is akin to the fine ‘hypermeters’ in Horace, C. 2. 3. 27; 3. 29. 35 f., and Vergil, Aen. 4. 625. With the authority of the best MS. behind it, is not to be gainsaid.

page 96 note 2 Elisions of the type ‘finitimi exemplum’ are rare in the Met..—1 in 1000 lines about—a minor point in a difficult problem, but nevertheless worth weighing.

page 96 note 3 Cf. Prop. 2. 3. 42, ‘Hie dominam exemplo ponat in arte meam.’

page 96 note 4 Notae Latinae (Cambridge, 1915), p. 426.

page 97 note 1 Compare with the corrupt line (317a) in M ‘venit Athalantis cenei pulcherrima virgo’ the words of Apollodorus loc. cit. , from which one might conceivably conjecture that the line should run Schoenëis | Atalanta venit, etc. ; cf. Am. 1. 7. 13.

page 97 note 2 See Book XI.

page 97 note 3 o = c. So the scribe of Harley MS. 2610 gives Ovid's name on his first page as P. C. Naso.

page 98 note 1 Cf. 29 adflabitur ; 104 efflant. At 8, 289 Planudes renders ‘adflatu’ by the same word, ἄσθματι.

page 98 note 2 Nero 37. The letters e and f are repeatedly confused in the Met.

page 98 note 3 Cf Housman on Juvenal 8. 7, and for a similar interpolation in Sophocles, Ajax 771, where the expression δίας Ἀθάνας repeated from 757 would seem to have ousted the true text.