Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:59:04.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Neglected MS. of Plato

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

John Burnet
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , March 1902 , pp. 98 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1902

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 100 note 1 In his Index, Schneider had already pointed this out. He says of Vind. If ‘Veterem vulgatam repraesentat et fere cum Stobaeo, Eusebio, etc. consentit.’ Being in the Index, this observation has been left unnoticed. I did not know of it myself till I had already worked out the problem. It shows that the theory of an ‘ancient vulgate’ is not so modern as is sometimes supposed.