.
I take to be a gloss on φυτευμάτων above.—While Nauck is in the reader's hands I would suggest the following corrections: Aesch. fr. 124 
as 
for the meaningless ἰσχναίνων Soph. fr. 219 
or κλεῦμεν: or κλύμενα would do. 224 
, restoring sense and metre, 
. the preposition omitted more Sophocleo: so in 365 
, as perhaps O.C. 1566 
, unless ἱκνουμένων means 
. Eur. fr. 815 κτίσαι for κτεῖναι as in Cho.440. Aesch. fr. 134 
. 182 dele 
.
the usual corruption of a compound epithet. The schol. on Hom. Π 170 says Πίνδαρος (fr. 259) 
: a copyist being unfamiliar with the word, writes 
, ‘fifty beans.’
according to Coraes, ἐρέχθει or ἐρέχθεον according to Nauck.
‘mushrooms,’ and still quoted by the Dictionaries under μύκης, as though a plain could roar with mushrooms; those good little children of the earth are usually seen and not heard. It has long been evident that Athenaeus was mistaken, and that μύκαισι should be μυκαῖσι mugitibus. Another unrecognised dative has made trouble in Pers. 587 
, like ἄπιστα κλύουσι in Parrhasios' epigram: and πλάθουσι may well be a dative in Cho. 587, e.g. 
.
(si vera lectio) Ag. 598, στυγητός P. V. 617, ἰαλτός Cho. 22, as κλυτός in Homer, δυνατός in Pind. N. ii. 14 where I see no reason to suppose with Prof. Bury a suggestion of masculinity.
, the metaphor arising out of the usual sense of σίνος ‘physical iujury.’ But I must argue this another time.
, and the like.
. It is suitable to wind, since Hesych. explains θεμερή by εὐσταθής.
in Cho. 390. It alludes to the phrases technically used of wind; στάσις, properly its setting in a certain quarter, 
in Cho. 817 is an allusion to the 
.—Apoll. Rhod. 4. 820 has 
, but I do not think ἔῐκες or ἀïκά has anything to do with Theocr. 30. 32 
: I should complete Bergk's conjectures by reading 
as 
Hom. λ 61, Quint. 6. 416. In Theocr. 21. 65 I should read 
and in the 
. 13—17 
for 
.
which is unquestionably in accordance with the Aeschylean use of figure. σείειν is a synonym of 
, ‘shock’ or ‘agitate,’ quassare; and, like δονεῖν, may be said of wind or spirit equally: Eur. H.F. 895 
. Ar. Ach. 12 
, Liban. IV. 590. 4 
. 174. 28 
. Hdt. vi. 109 
(like a sudden squall) 
. Plat. Tim. 43 D, Polyb. xviii. 28. 2, Bekk. An. 242. 9.
, Frag. fr. (Clem. Al. p. 486) 
.
never mean ‘to eddy’; they always mean to circle round’, and can only be applied to water which encircles, as the Wear encircles Durham, as the Adige surrounds Verona, the Tmolus Sardes, or the Ocean-stream the Earth. Troy was not encircled by the Xanthus or Scamander, therefore 
in Tryphiod. 325 is nonsense. When I restored κυκοώμενον (the regular description of this river, Horn. Φ 235, 240, 324, and a synonym of its other epithet δινῆεν), I knew no reading but κυκλύμενρν, which Mr. Weinberger (1896) has not known how to correct; but the variants he now records are typical: 
.
.
. Aeschylus I suspect was thinking of that remarkable passage—Hesiodic or Orphic in character rather than Ionic—about 
and the Λιταί: Hom. I 505 
, with βλαφθεὶς in 512. In Ag. 406, when 
has her way, 
.
.
as in 1658 I would write 
and in 921 
In 924 correct 
to 
.
in Theb. 759, if not in Pind. fr. 75: cf. P. xi. 47, Hom. β 50 and the oracle in Hdt. v. 78.—ὑπερβαρτον in Aesch. fr. 99. 21 may be for ὑπέρφατον or ὑπέρβατον.
. ‘By what word or act can I waft you hither? Light is the counterpart of darkness, and accordingly (in the underworld where all things are reversed), belauding lamentation is called a gratification to the dead’, who are in this case ‘the former Atreidae of the house’. Cf. Soph. El. 1066. I don't see why προσθοδόμοις should not admit this sense as well as ‘before the house’.—In Theb. 195, by the way, I would suggest πρόδομος for πρόδομος, a common error.—Or, with the same punctuation, a slightly different application is suggested by Pind. O. viii. 77 seqq., ‘Both Light and Darkness have their corresponding claims’.—In Cho. 329 μαγεύει for μαγεύει is a tempting change, ‘acts like an ἐπῳδή on the dead’.
as a phrase, ὅρος was a limit, boundary, dividing line, or stone to mark it; to cross this limit was ὑπερβαίνειν, which might be heightened to άπερπηδνᾶ or άπερθορεῖν: but 
‘to range over the surface of a limit’ no Greek ever said, nor ever will until a line shall be a space. But with some minds the wish to believe in manuscript tradition 
.
. Schol. Ar. Av. 822 
.
Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Roberts, Deborah H.
2023.
A Companion to Aeschylus.
p.
437.